Motivated by applications to property testing in the online-erasure model of Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), we define and analyze semi-sample-based testers for Reed-Muller codes. The task in Reed-Muller testing is to determine whether an input function f: 𝔽ⁿ → 𝔽 belongs to the Reed-Muller code or is far from it, using as few point queries to f as possible. Reed-Muller testing is a well-studied task with its roots in both the Property Testing and Probabilistically Checkable Proofs literature. The online-erasure model introduces a twist: after each query made, an adversary may erase up to t points of the input function, potentially thwarting any test in which the queries follow a predictable pattern. Semi-sample-based testers are a hybrid between sample-based testers - which can only make uniformly random queries to the input function - and standard testers, which can choose their queries freely. They are designed with the online-erasure model in mind and operate by first choosing some subset S of the domain and then making their queries uniformly at random inside of S. We describe semi-sample-based testers for the Reed-Muller code and give an optimal analysis of their soundness. Consequently, we show that semi-sample-based testers are indeed effective in the presence of online erasures, and thereby achieve optimal query complexity for testing the Reed-Muller code in the online-erasure model. This result improves upon prior work of Minzer and Zheng (SODA 2024). As an added bonus, we show that semi-sample-based testers also exist for the lifted affine-invariant codes of Guo, Kopparty, and Sudan (ITCS 2013), thereby providing the first known testers for these codes in the online-erasure model.

We study property testing with incomplete or noisy inputs. The models we consider allow for adversarial manipulation of the input, but differ in whether the manipulation can be done only offline, i.e., before the execution of the algorithm, or online, i.e., as the algorithm runs. The manipulations by an adversary can come in the form of erasures or corruptions. We compare the query complexity and the randomness complexity of property testing in the offline and online models. Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, and Varma (Theory Comput `23) provide properties that can be tested with a small number of queries with offline erasures, but cannot be tested at all with online erasures. We demonstrate that the two models are incomparable in terms of query complexity: we construct properties that can be tested with a constant number of queries in the online corruption model, but require querying a significant fraction of the input in the offline erasure model. We also construct properties that exhibit a strong separation between the randomness complexity of testing in the presence of offline and online adversaries: testing these properties in the online model requires exponentially more random bits than in the offline model, even when they are tested with nearly the same number of queries in both models. Our randomness separation relies on a novel reduction from randomness-efficient testers in the adversarial online model to query-efficient testers in the standard model.

We study the problem of robust multivariate polynomial regression: let $p\colon\mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ be an unknown $n$-variate polynomial of degree at most $d$ in each variable. We are given as input a set of random samples $(\mathbf{x}_i,y_i) \in [-1,1]^n \times \mathbb{R}$ that are noisy versions of $(\mathbf{x}_i,p(\mathbf{x}_i))$. More precisely, each $\mathbf{x}_i$ is sampled independently from some distribution $χ$ on $[-1,1]^n$, and for each $i$ independently, $y_i$ is arbitrary (i.e., an outlier) with probability at most $ρ< 1/2$, and otherwise satisfies $|y_i-p(\mathbf{x}_i)|\leqσ$. The goal is to output a polynomial $\hat{p}$, of degree at most $d$ in each variable, within an $\ell_\infty$-distance of at most $O(σ)$ from $p$. Kane, Karmalkar, and Price [FOCS'17] solved this problem for $n=1$. We generalize their results to the $n$-variate setting, showing an algorithm that achieves a sample complexity of $O_n(d^n\log d)$, where the hidden constant depends on $n$, if $χ$ is the $n$-dimensional Chebyshev distribution. The sample complexity is $O_n(d^{2n}\log d)$, if the samples are drawn from the uniform distribution instead. The approximation error is guaranteed to be at most $O(σ)$, and the run-time depends on $\log(1/σ)$. In the setting where each $\mathbf{x}_i$ and $y_i$ are known up to $N$ bits of precision, the run-time's dependence on $N$ is linear. We also show that our sample complexities are optimal in terms of $d^n$. Furthermore, we show that it is possible to have the run-time be independent of $1/σ$, at the cost of a higher sample complexity.

In a recent breakthrough, Kelley and Meka (FOCS 2023) obtained a strong upper bound on the density of sets of integers without non-trivial three-term arithmetic progressions. In this work, we extend their result, establishing similar bounds for all linear patterns defined by binary systems of linear forms, where “binary” indicates that every linear form depends on exactly two variables. Prior to our work, no strong bounds were known for such systems even in the finite field model setting. A key ingredient in our proof is a graph counting lemma. The classical graph counting lemma, developed by Thomason (Random Graphs 1985) and Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 1989), is a fundamental tool in combinatorics. For a fixed graph$H$, it states that the number of copies of$H$in a pseudorandom graph$G$is similar to the number of copies of$H$in a purely random graph with the same edge density as$G$. However, this lemma is only non-trivial when$G$is a dense graph. In this work, we prove a graph counting lemma that is also effective when$G$is sparse. Moreover, our lemma is well-suited for density increment arguments in additive number theory. As an immediate application, we obtain a strong bound for the Turán problem in abelian Cayley sum graphs: let$\Gamma$be a finite abelian group with odd order. If a Cayley sum graph on$\Gamma$does not contain any r-elique as a sub graph, it must have at most$2^{-\Omega_r\left(\log ^{1 / 16}\vert \Gamma\vert \right)} \cdot\vert \Gamma\vert ^2$edges. These results hinge on the technology developed by Kelley and Meka and the follow-up work by Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024).

The online manipulation-resilient testing model, proposed by Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova and Varma (ITCS 2022 and Theory of Computing 2023), studies property testing in situations where access to the input degrades continuously and adversarially. Specifically, after each query made by the tester is answered, the adversary can intervene and either erase or corrupt $t$ data points. In this work, we investigate a more nuanced version of the online model in order to overcome old and new impossibility results for the original model. We start by presenting an optimal tester for linearity and a lower bound for low-degree testing of Boolean functions in the original model. We overcome the lower bound by allowing batch queries, where the tester gets a group of queries answered between manipulations of the data. Our batch size is small enough so that function values for a single batch on their own give no information about whether the function is of low degree. Finally, to overcome the impossibility results of Kalemaj et al. for sortedness and the Lipschitz property of sequences, we extend the model to include $t<1$, i.e., adversaries that make less than one erasure per query. For sortedness, we characterize the rate of erasures for which online testing can be performed, exhibiting a sharp transition from optimal query complexity to impossibility of testability (with any number of queries). Our online tester works for a general class of local properties of sequences. One feature of our results is that we get new (and in some cases, simpler) optimal algorithms for several properties in the standard property testing model.

We study the problem of testing whether a function f : ℝn → ℝ is a polynomial of degree at most d in the distribution-free testing model. Here, the distance between functions is measured with respect to an unknown distribution D over ℝn from which we can draw samples. In contrast to previous work, we do not assume that D has finite support. We design a tester that given query access to f, and sample access to D, makes poly(d/ε) many queries to f, accepts with probability 1 if f is a polynomial of degree d, and rejects with probability at least 2/3 if every degree-d polynomial P disagrees with f on a set of mass at least ε with respect to D. Our result also holds under mild assumptions when we receive only a polynomial number of bits of precision for each query to f, or when f can only be queried on rational points representable using a logarithmic number of bits. Along the way, we prove a new stability theorem for multivariate polynomials that may be of independent interest. * The arXiv version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08404

We give alternate proofs for three related results in analysis of Boolean functions, namely the KKL Theorem, Friedgut’s Junta Theorem, and Talagrand’s strengthening of the KKL Theorem. We follow a new approach: looking at the first Fourier level of the function after a suitable random restriction and applying the Log-Sobolev inequality appropriately. In particular, we avoid using the hypercontractive inequality that is common to the original proofs. Our proofs might serve as an alternate, uniform exposition to these theorems and the techniques might benefit further research.