VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Pampus
dblp:254/6280
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2309-6183ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Towards Consistent Policy Enforcement in Dataspaces
Julia Pampus, Maritta Heisel |
DATA | 1 |
| 2024 | An Empirical Examination of the Technical Aspects of Data Sovereignty
Julia Pampus, Maritta Heisel |
ICSOFT | 1 |
| 2023 | Implementing Data Sovereignty: Requirements & Challenges from PracticeabstractData sovereignty, the possibility to keep control over data, is gaining increasing attention in both research and industry. Due to complex supply chains and a strong trend toward digitization, digital assets are essential to be fast and competitive. As a result, companies need to share data while retaining control over it to prevent unwanted leaks of sensitive data. However, implementing effective data governance, access, and usage control mechanisms can be challenging, especially in cross-company data sharing networks and ecosystems like dataspaces. In this paper, we examine the industrial landscape and interview eleven experts from software providers and producing organizations to identify their requirements and challenges of existing data sovereign solutions. Based on Grounded Theory and semi-structured interviews, we explore the motivations and issues behind data sharing from an Information Systems and Software Engineering point of view. The findings include current industrial contexts, use cases, and solutions with data sovereignty’s technical and non-technical implementations. Seven requirements and thirteen challenges were observed throughout a qualitative analysis. Clustered by organizational, technical, personal, and emotional viewpoints, they are discussed with initial approaches for mitigation. The results identify current practical needs and will enable the design of future data sovereignty solutions in theory and different practical domains. Malte Hellmeier, Julia Pampus, Haydar Qarawlus, Falk Howar |
ARES | 2 |
| 2022 | Data sovereignty for AI pipelines: lessons learned from an industrial project at Mondragon corporationabstractThe establishment of collaborative AI pipelines, in which multiple organizations share their data and models, is often complicated by lengthy data governance processes and legal clarifications. Data sovereignty solutions, which ensure data is being used under agreed terms and conditions, are promising to overcome these problems. However, there is limited research on their applicability in AI pipelines. In this study, we extended an existing AI pipeline at Mondragon Corporation, in which sensor data is collected and subsequently forwarded to a data quality service provider with a data sovereignty component. By systematically reflecting and generalizing our experiences during the twelve-month action research project, we formulated ten lessons learned, four benefits, and three barriers to data-sovereign AI pipelines that can inform further research and custom implementations. Our results show that a data sovereignty component can help reduce existing barriers and increase the success of collaborative data science initiatives. Marcel Altendeitering, Julia Pampus, Felix Larrinaga, Jon Legaristi, Falk Howar |
CAIN | 2 |
| 2022 | Evolving Data Space Technologies: Lessons Learned from an IDS Connector Reference Implementation
Julia Pampus, Brian-Frederik Jahnke, Ronja Quensel |
ISoLA (4) | 1 |
| 2020 | A Framework for Creating Policy-agnostic Programming Languagesabstract31 Fabian Bruckner, Julia Pampus, Falk Howar |
DATA | 2 |