Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikolay Khlebnikov

dblp:255/0477 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 62% Language models and text generation · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
semantic similarity
0.512021
Style-transfer and Paraphrase: Looking for a Sensible Semantic Similarity Metric · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
paraphrase generation
0.112021
Style-transfer and Paraphrase: Looking for a Sensible Semantic Similarity Metric · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
text style transfer
0.112021
Style-transfer and Paraphrase: Looking for a Sensible Semantic Similarity Metric · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word mover distance · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Style-transfer and Paraphrase: Looking for a Sensible Semantic Similarity Metric
abstract
The rapid development of such natural language processing tasks as style transfer, paraphrase, and machine translation often calls for the use of semantic similarity metrics. In recent years a lot of methods to measure the semantic similarity of two short texts were developed. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis for more than a dozen of such methods. Using a new dataset of fourteen thousand sentence pairs human-labeled according to their semantic similarity, we demonstrate that none of the metrics widely used in the literature is close enough to human judgment in these tasks. A number of recently proposed metrics provide comparable results, yet Word Mover Distance is shown to be the most reasonable solution to measure semantic similarity in reformulated texts at the moment.
Ivan P. Yamshchikov, Viacheslav Shibaev, Nikolay Khlebnikov, Alexey Tikhonov
AAAI3