Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amaresh Ankit Siva

dblp:255/5319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 79% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 21%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.122022
Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queries · NeurIPS 2022
Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection · ICML 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
private query
0.612022
Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queries · NeurIPS 2022
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation
0.612022
Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queries · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias evaluation
bias detection
0.512021
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.512021
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance
0.512021
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud · KDD 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud · KDD 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private query answering
0.512021
Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection · ICML 2021
Cloud and datacenter computing
machine learning as a service
0.112021
Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature importance computation · 1.0bias detection · 1.0synthetic data generation · 0.6linear threshold query · 0.6differential privacy · 0.6randomized rounding · 0.5projection mechanism · 0.5adaptive projection · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queries
abstract
We provide a differentially private algorithm for producing synthetic data simultaneously useful for multiple tasks: marginal queries and multitask machine learning (ML). A key innovation in our algorithm is the ability to directly handle numerical features, in contrast to a number of related prior approaches which require numerical features to be first converted into {high cardinality} categorical features via {a binning strategy}. Higher binning granularity is required for better accuracy, but this negatively impacts scalability. Eliminating the need for binning allows us to produce synthetic data preserving large numbers of statistical queries such as marginals on numerical features, and class conditional linear threshold queries. Preserving the latter means that the fraction of points of each class label above a particular half-space is roughly the same in both the real and synthetic data. This is the property that is needed to train a linear classifier in a multitask setting. Our algorithm also allows us to produce high quality synthetic data for mixed marginal queries, that combine both categorical and numerical features. Our method consistently runs 2-5x faster than the best comparable techniques, and provides significant accuracy improvements in both marginal queries and linear prediction tasks for mixed-type datasets.
Giuseppe Vietri, Cédric Archambeau, Sergül Aydöre, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth 0001, Amaresh Ankit Siva, Steven Z. Wu
NeurIPS7
2021 Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection
abstract
We propose, implement, and evaluate a new algo-rithm for releasing answers to very large numbersof statistical queries likek-way marginals, sub-ject to differential privacy. Our algorithm makesadaptive use of a continuous relaxation of thePro-jection Mechanism, which answers queries on theprivate dataset using simple perturbation, and thenattempts to find the synthetic dataset that mostclosely matches the noisy answers. We use a con-tinuous relaxation of the synthetic dataset domainwhich makes the projection loss differentiable,and allows us to use efficient ML optimizationtechniques and tooling. Rather than answering allqueries up front, we make judicious use of ourprivacy budget by iteratively finding queries forwhich our (relaxed) synthetic data has high error,and then repeating the projection. Randomizedrounding allows us to obtain synthetic data in theoriginal schema. We perform experimental evalu-ations across a range of parameters and datasets,and find that our method outperforms existingalgorithms on large query classes.
Sergül Aydöre, Michael Kearns, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Luca Melis, Aaron Roth 0001, Amaresh Ankit Siva
ICML7
2021 Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud
abstract
Understanding the predictions made by machine learning (ML) models and their potential biases remains a challenging and labor-intensive task that depends on the application, the dataset, and the specific model. We present Amazon SageMaker Clarify, an explainability feature for Amazon SageMaker that launched in December 2020, providing insights into data and ML models by identifying biases and explaining predictions. It is deeply integrated into Amazon SageMaker, a fully managed service that enables data scientists and developers to build, train, and deploy ML models at any scale. Clarify supports bias detection and feature importance computation across the ML lifecycle, during data preparation, model evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring. We outline the desiderata derived from customer input, the modular architecture, and the methodology for bias and explanation computations. Further, we describe the technical challenges encountered and the tradeoffs we had to make. For illustration, we discuss two customer use cases. We present our deployment results including qualitative customer feedback and a quantitative evaluation. Finally, we summarize lessons learned, and discuss best practices for the successful adoption of fairness and explanation tools in practice.
Michaela Hardt, Xiaoyi Cheng, Michele Donini, Jason Gelman, Satish Gollaprolu, John He, Pedro Larroy, Nick McCarthy, Ashish Rathi, Scott Rees, Amaresh Ankit Siva, ErhYuan Tsai, Keerthan Vasist, Pinar Yilmaz, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Sanjiv Das, Kevin Haas, Tyler Hill, Krishnaram Kenthapadi
KDD13