Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shubham Kumar Bharti
dblp:255/5381
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 56% Reinforcement learning · 32% Trustworthy machine learning · 12% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › machine teaching
teaching dimension |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning Learners · NeurIPS 2024 The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning Learners · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › offline imitation learning
behavior cloning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning Learners · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning Learners · NeurIPS 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subspace projection · 1.1state sanitization · 1.1linear hypothesis class · 0.8approximation algorithm · 0.8teaching algorithms · 0.5sample complexity analysis · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Perceptually Training Viewers against Misleading Data Visualizations with Informative feedback
Jihyun Rho, Shubham Kumar Bharti, Shiyun Cheng, Martina A. Rau, Jerry Zhu |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | Various Misleading Visual Features in Misleading Graphs: Do they truly deceive us?
Jihyun Rho, Martina A. Rau, Shubham Kumar Bharti, Rosanne Luu, Jeremy McMahan, Jerry Zhu |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2024 | On the Complexity of Teaching a Family of Linear Behavior Cloning LearnersabstractWe study optimal teaching for a family of Behavior Cloning learners that learn using a linear hypothesis class. In this setup, a knowledgeable teacher can demonstrate a dataset of state and action tuples and is required to teach an optimal policy to an entire family of BC learners using the smallest possible dataset. We analyze the linear family and design a novel teaching algorithm called `TIE' that achieves the instance optimal Teaching Dimension for the entire family. However, we show that this problem is NP-hard for action spaces with $|\mathcal{A}| > 2$ and provide an efficient approximation algorithm with a $\log(|\mathcal{A}| - 1)$ guarantee on the optimal teaching size. We present empirical results to demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm and compare it to various baselines in different teaching environments. Shubham Kumar Bharti, Stephen Wright, Adish Singla, Xiaojin Zhu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Provable Defense against Backdoor Policies in Reinforcement LearningabstractWe propose a provable defense mechanism against backdoor policies in reinforcement learning under subspace trigger assumption. A backdoor policy is a security threat where an adversary publishes a seemingly well-behaved policy which in fact allows hidden triggers. During deployment, the adversary can modify observed states in a particular way to trigger unexpected actions and harm the agent. We assume the agent does not have the resources to re-train a good policy. Instead, our defense mechanism sanitizes the backdoor policy by projecting observed states to a `safe subspace', estimated from a small number of interactions with a clean (non-triggered) environment. Our sanitized policy achieves $\epsilon$ approximate optimality in the presence of triggers, provided the number of clean interactions is $O\left(\frac{D}{(1-\gamma)^4 \epsilon^2}\right)$ where $\gamma$ is the discounting factor and $D$ is the dimension of state space. Empirically, we show that our sanitization defense performs well on two Atari game environments. Shubham Kumar Bharti, Xuezhou Zhang, Adish Singla, Jerry Zhu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | The Sample Complexity of Teaching by Reinforcement on Q-LearningabstractWe study the sample complexity of teaching, termed as ``teaching dimension" (TDim) in the literature, for the teaching-by-reinforcement paradigm, where the teacher guides the student through rewards. This is distinct from the teaching-by-demonstration paradigm motivated by robotics applications, where the teacher teaches by providing demonstrations of state/action trajectories. The teaching-by-reinforcement paradigm applies to a wider range of real-world settings where a demonstration is inconvenient, but has not been studied systematically. In this paper, we focus on a specific family of reinforcement learning algorithms, Q-learning, and characterize the TDim under different teachers with varying control power over the environment, and present matching optimal teaching algorithms. Our TDim results provide the minimum number of samples needed for reinforcement learning, and we discuss their connections to standard PAC-style RL sample complexity and teaching-by-demonstration sample complexity results. Our teaching algorithms have the potential to speed up RL agent learning in applications where a helpful teacher is available. Xuezhou Zhang, Shubham Kumar Bharti, Yuzhe Ma, Adish Singla, Xiaojin Zhu 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |