Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim De Ryck

dblp:255/5932 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6860-1345ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 38% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Learning theory · 29%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
preconditioning
0.812024
An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning · ICLR 2024
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning
0.812024
An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.712023
Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEs · NeurIPS 2023
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE operator learning
0.712023
Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEs · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
approximation theory
0.612022
Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
operator learning
0.612022
Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks
0.612022
Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.612022
Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universality theorem · 2.0convolutional neural operators · 2.0physics-informed neural networks · 1.1fourier neural operator · 1.1DeepONet · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning
abstract
In this paper, we investigate the behavior of gradient descent algorithms in physics-informed machine learning methods like PINNs, which minimize residuals connected to partial differential equations (PDEs). Our key result is that the difficulty in training these models is closely related to the conditioning of a specific differential operator. This operator, in turn, is associated to the Hermitian square of the differential operator of the underlying PDE. If this operator is ill-conditioned, it results in slow or infeasible training. Therefore, preconditioning this operator is crucial. We employ both rigorous mathematical analysis and empirical evaluations to investigate various strategies, explaining how they better condition this critical operator, and consequently improve training.
Tim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de Bézenac
ICLR1
2023 Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEs
abstract
Although very successfully used in conventional machine learning, convolution based neural network architectures -- believed to be inconsistent in function space -- have been largely ignored in the context of learning solution operators of PDEs. Here, we present novel adaptations for convolutional neural networks to demonstrate that they are indeed able to process functions as inputs and outputs. The resulting architecture, termed as convolutional neural operators (CNOs), is designed specifically to preserve its underlying continuous nature, even when implemented in a discretized form on a computer. We prove a universality theorem to show that CNOs can approximate operators arising in PDEs to desired accuracy. CNOs are tested on a novel suite of benchmarks, encompassing a diverse set of PDEs with multi-scale solutions and are observed to significantly outperform baselines, paving the way for an alternative framework for robust and accurate operator learning.
Bogdan Raonic, Roberto Molinaro, Tim De Ryck, Tobias Rohner, Francesca Bartolucci, Rima Alaifari, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de Bézenac
NeurIPS3
2022 Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning
abstract
We propose a very general framework for deriving rigorous bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and operator learning architectures such as DeepONets and FNOs as well as for physics-informed operator learning. These bounds guarantee that PINNs and (physics-informed) DeepONets or FNOs will efficiently approximate the underlying solution or solution-operator of generic partial differential equations (PDEs). Our framework utilizes existing neural network approximation results to obtain bounds on more-involved learning architectures for PDEs. We illustrate the general framework by deriving the first rigorous bounds on the approximation error of physics-informed operator learning and by showing that PINNs (and physics-informed DeepONets and FNOs) mitigate the curse of dimensionality in approximating nonlinear parabolic PDEs.
Tim De Ryck, Siddhartha Mishra
NeurIPS1
2021 On the approximation of functions by tanh neural networks
abstract
We derive bounds on the error, in high-order Sobolev norms, incurred in the approximation of Sobolev-regular as well as analytic functions by neural networks with the hyperbolic tangent activation function. These bounds provide explicit estimates on the approximation error with respect to the size of the neural networks. We show that tanh neural networks with only two hidden layers suffice to approximate functions at comparable or better rates than much deeper ReLU neural networks.
Tim De Ryck, Samuel Lanthaler, Siddhartha Mishra
Neural Networks1