Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim De Ryck
dblp:255/5932
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6860-1345ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 38% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Learning theory · 29% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
preconditioning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE operator learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
approximation theory |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
operator learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
universality theorem · 2.0convolutional neural operators · 2.0physics-informed neural networks · 1.1fourier neural operator · 1.1DeepONet · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningabstractIn this paper, we investigate the behavior of gradient descent algorithms in physics-informed machine learning methods like PINNs, which minimize residuals connected to partial differential equations (PDEs). Our key result is that the difficulty in training these models is closely related to the conditioning of a specific differential operator. This operator, in turn, is associated to the Hermitian square of the differential operator of the underlying PDE. If this operator is ill-conditioned, it results in slow or infeasible training. Therefore, preconditioning this operator is crucial. We employ both rigorous mathematical analysis and empirical evaluations to investigate various strategies, explaining how they better condition this critical operator, and consequently improve training. Tim De Ryck, Florent Bonnet, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de Bézenac |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEsabstractAlthough very successfully used in conventional machine learning, convolution based neural network architectures -- believed to be inconsistent in function space -- have been largely ignored in the context of learning solution operators of PDEs. Here, we present novel adaptations for convolutional neural networks to demonstrate that they are indeed able to process functions as inputs and outputs. The resulting architecture, termed as convolutional neural operators (CNOs), is designed specifically to preserve its underlying continuous nature, even when implemented in a discretized form on a computer. We prove a universality theorem to show that CNOs can approximate operators arising in PDEs to desired accuracy. CNOs are tested on a novel suite of benchmarks, encompassing a diverse set of PDEs with multi-scale solutions and are observed to significantly outperform baselines, paving the way for an alternative framework for robust and accurate operator learning. Bogdan Raonic, Roberto Molinaro, Tim De Ryck, Tobias Rohner, Francesca Bartolucci, Rima Alaifari, Siddhartha Mishra, Emmanuel de Bézenac |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Generic bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed (and) operator learningabstractWe propose a very general framework for deriving rigorous bounds on the approximation error for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and operator learning architectures such as DeepONets and FNOs as well as for physics-informed operator learning. These bounds guarantee that PINNs and (physics-informed) DeepONets or FNOs will efficiently approximate the underlying solution or solution-operator of generic partial differential equations (PDEs). Our framework utilizes existing neural network approximation results to obtain bounds on more-involved learning architectures for PDEs. We illustrate the general framework by deriving the first rigorous bounds on the approximation error of physics-informed operator learning and by showing that PINNs (and physics-informed DeepONets and FNOs) mitigate the curse of dimensionality in approximating nonlinear parabolic PDEs. Tim De Ryck, Siddhartha Mishra |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | On the approximation of functions by tanh neural networksabstractWe derive bounds on the error, in high-order Sobolev norms, incurred in the approximation of Sobolev-regular as well as analytic functions by neural networks with the hyperbolic tangent activation function. These bounds provide explicit estimates on the approximation error with respect to the size of the neural networks. We show that tanh neural networks with only two hidden layers suffice to approximate functions at comparable or better rates than much deeper ReLU neural networks. Tim De Ryck, Samuel Lanthaler, Siddhartha Mishra |
Neural Networks | 1 |