VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Helga Bergholtz
dblp:255/6829
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-0999-1106ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › breast cancer
breast cancer subtyping |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
genomic data integration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
integrative clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohort · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gibbs sampler · 0.4bayesian latent structure model · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Tailored graphical lasso for data integration in gene network reconstructionabstractBACKGROUND: Identifying gene interactions is a topic of great importance in genomics, and approaches based on network models provide a powerful tool for studying these. Assuming a Gaussian graphical model, a gene association network may be estimated from multiomic data based on the non-zero entries of the inverse covariance matrix. Inferring such biological networks is challenging because of the high dimensionality of the problem, making traditional estimators unsuitable. The graphical lasso is constructed for the estimation of sparse inverse covariance matrices in such situations, using [Formula: see text]-penalization on the matrix entries. The weighted graphical lasso is an extension in which prior biological information from other sources is integrated into the model. There are however issues with this approach, as it naïvely forces the prior information into the network estimation, even if it is misleading or does not agree with the data at hand. Further, if an associated network based on other data is used as the prior, the method often fails to utilize the information effectively. RESULTS: We propose a novel graphical lasso approach, the tailored graphical lasso, that aims to handle prior information of unknown accuracy more effectively. We provide an R package implementing the method, tailoredGlasso. Applying the method to both simulated and real multiomic data sets, we find that it outperforms the unweighted and weighted graphical lasso in terms of all performance measures we consider. In fact, the graphical lasso and weighted graphical lasso can be considered special cases of the tailored graphical lasso, and a parameter determined by the data measures the usefulness of the prior information. We also find that among a larger set of methods, the tailored graphical is the most suitable for network inference from high-dimensional data with prior information of unknown accuracy. With our method, mRNA data are demonstrated to provide highly useful prior information for protein-protein interaction networks. CONCLUSIONS: The method we introduce utilizes useful prior information more effectively without involving any risk of loss of accuracy should the prior information be misleading. Camilla Lingjærde, Tonje Lien, Ørnulf Borgan, Helga Bergholtz, Ingrid Kristine Glad |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2019 | A Bayesian two-way latent structure model for genomic data integration reveals few pan-genomic cluster subtypes in a breast cancer cohortabstractMOTIVATION: Unsupervised clustering is important in disease subtyping, among having other genomic applications. As genomic data has become more multifaceted, how to cluster across data sources for more precise subtyping is an ever more important area of research. Many of the methods proposed so far, including iCluster and Cluster of Cluster Assignments (COCAs), make an unreasonable assumption of a common clustering across all data sources, and those that do not are fewer and tend to be computationally intensive. RESULTS: We propose a Bayesian parametric model for integrative, unsupervised clustering across data sources. In our two-way latent structure model, samples are clustered in relation to each specific data source, distinguishing it from methods like COCAs and iCluster, but cluster labels have across-dataset meaning, allowing cluster information to be shared between data sources. A common scaling across data sources is not required, and inference is obtained by a Gibbs Sampler, which we improve with a warm start strategy and modified density functions to robustify and speed convergence. Posterior interpretation allows for inference on common clusterings occurring among subsets of data sources. An interesting statistical formulation of the model results in sampling from closed-form posteriors despite incorporation of a complex latent structure. We fit the model with Gaussian and more general densities, which influences the degree of across-dataset cluster label sharing. Uniquely among integrative clustering models, our formulation makes no nestedness assumptions of samples across data sources so that a sample missing data from one genomic source can be clustered according to its existing data sources. We apply our model to a Norwegian breast cancer cohort of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive tumors, comprised of somatic copy-number alteration, methylation and expression datasets. We find enrichment in the Her2 subtype and ductal carcinoma among those observations exhibiting greater cluster correspondence across expression and CNA data. In general, there are few pan-genomic clusterings, suggesting that models assuming a common clustering across genomic data sources might yield misleading results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The model is implemented in an R package called twl ('two-way latent'), available on CRAN. Data for analysis are available within the R package. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. David M. Swanson, Tonje Lien, Helga Bergholtz, Therese Sørlie, Arnoldo Frigessi |
Bioinform. | 3 |