Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cornelius Schröder
dblp:255/6950
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5643-2097ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | FNOPE: Simulation-based inference on function spaces with Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 Sourcerer: Sample-based Maximum Entropy Source Distribution Estimation · NeurIPS 2024 Simultaneous identification of models and parameters of scientific simulators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FNOPE: Simulation-based inference on function spaces with Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Simultaneous identification of models and parameters of scientific simulators · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Approximate Bayesian Inference for a Mechanistic Model of Vesicle Release at a Ribbon Synapse · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fourier neural operator · 1.7flow matching · 1.7neural network posterior estimation · 1.5grassmann formalism · 1.5conditional mixture of multivariate binary distributions · 1.5sliced wasserstein distance · 0.8maximum entropy · 0.8bayesian updating · 0.4approximate bayesian inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Taming Perception Jitter: Uncertainty-Aware LiDAR Object Detection for Reliable Motion Classification
Cornelius Schröder, Zygimantas Marcinkus, Markus Lienkamp |
IV | 1 |
| 2026 | Improving EKF Consistency in 3D Multi-Object Tracking via Heteroscedastic Detection Uncertainty
Cornelius Schröder, Felix Fent, Markus Lienkamp |
VEHITS | 1 |
| 2025 | Calibrating the Full Predictive Class Distribution of 3D Object Detectors for Autonomous DrivingabstractIn autonomous systems, precise object detection and uncertainty estimation are critical for self-aware and safe operation. This work addresses confidence calibration for the classification task of 3D object detectors. We argue that it is necessary to regard the calibration of the full predictive confidence distribution over all classes and deduce a metric which captures the calibration of dominant and secondary class predictions. We propose two auxiliary regularizing loss terms which introduce either calibration of the dominant prediction or the full prediction vector as a training goal. We evaluate a range of post-hoc and train-time methods for CenterPoint, PillarNet and DSVT-Pillar and find that combining our loss term, which regularizes for calibration of the full class prediction, and isotonic regression lead to the best calibration of CenterPoint and PillarNet with respect to both dominant and secondary class predictions. We further find that DSVT-Pillar can not be jointly calibrated for dominant and secondary predictions using the same method. Cornelius Schröder, Marius-Raphael Schlüter, Markus Lienkamp |
IV | 1 |
| 2025 | FNOPE: Simulation-based inference on function spaces with Fourier Neural OperatorsabstractSimulation-based inference (SBI) is an established approach for performing Bayesian inference on scientific simulators. SBI so far works best on low-dimensional parametric models. However, it is difficult to infer function-valued parameters, which frequently occur in disciplines that model spatiotemporal processes such as the climate and earth sciences. Here, we introduce an approach for efficient posterior estimation, using a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) architecture with a flow matching objective. We show that our approach, FNOPE, can perform inference of function-valued parameters at a fraction of the simulation budget of state of the art methods. In addition, FNOPE supports posterior evaluation at arbitrary discretizations of the domain, as well as simultaneous estimation of vector-valued parameters. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on several benchmark tasks and a challenging spatial inference task from glaciology. FNOPE extends the applicability of SBI methods to new scientific domains by enabling the inference of function-valued parameters. Guy Moss 0001, Leah Sophie Muhle, Reinhard Drews, Jakob H. Macke, Cornelius Schröder |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2025 | Uncertainty mapping and probabilistic tractography using Simulation-based Inference in diffusion MRI: A comparison with classical BayesabstractSimulation-Based Inference (SBI) has recently emerged as a powerful framework for Bayesian inference: Neural networks are trained on simulations from a forward model, and learn to rapidly estimate posterior distributions. We here present an SBI framework for parametric spherical deconvolution of diffusion MRI data of the brain. We demonstrate its utility for estimating white matter fibre orientations, mapping uncertainty of voxel-based estimates and performing probabilistic tractography by spatially propagating fibre orientation uncertainty. We conduct an extensive comparison against established Bayesian methods based on Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) and find that: a) in-silico training can lead to calibrated SBI networks with accurate parameter estimates and uncertainty mapping for both single- and multi-shell diffusion MRI, b) SBI allows amortised inference of the posterior distribution of model parameters given unseen observations, which is orders of magnitude faster than MCMC, c) SBI-based tractography yields reconstructions that have a high level of agreement with their MCMC-based counterparts, equal to or higher than scan-rescan reproducibility of estimates. We further demonstrate how SBI design considerations (such as dealing with noise, defining priors and handling model selection) can affect performance, allowing us to identify optimal practices. Taken together, our results show that SBI provides a powerful alternative to classical Bayesian inference approaches for fast and accurate model estimation and uncertainty mapping in MRI. J. P. Manzano-Patrón, Michael Deistler, Cornelius Schröder, Theodore Kypraios, Pedro J. Gonçalves, Jakob H. Macke, Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos |
Medical Image Anal. | 3 |
| 2024 | Simultaneous identification of models and parameters of scientific simulatorsabstractMany scientific models are composed of multiple discrete components, and scientists often make heuristic decisions about which components to include. Bayesian inference provides a mathematical framework for systematically selecting model components, but defining prior distributions over model components and developing associated inference schemes has been challenging. We approach this problem in a simulation-based inference framework: We define model priors over candidate components and, from model simulations, train neural networks to infer joint probability distributions over both model components and associated parameters. Our method, simulation-based model inference (SBMI), represents distributions over model components as a conditional mixture of multivariate binary distributions in the Grassmann formalism. SBMI can be applied to any compositional stochastic simulator without requiring likelihood evaluations. We evaluate SBMI on a simple time series model and on two scientific models from neuroscience, and show that it can discover multiple data-consistent model configurations, and that it reveals non-identifiable model components and parameters. SBMI provides a powerful tool for data-driven scientific inquiry which will allow scientists to identify essential model components and make uncertainty-informed modelling decisions. Cornelius Schröder, Jakob H. Macke |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Sourcerer: Sample-based Maximum Entropy Source Distribution EstimationabstractScientific modeling applications often require estimating a distribution of parameters consistent with a dataset of observations - an inference task also known as source distribution estimation. This problem can be ill-posed, however, since many different source distributions might produce the same distribution of data-consistent simulations. To make a principled choice among many equally valid sources, we propose an approach which targets the maximum entropy distribution, i.e., prioritizes retaining as much uncertainty as possible. Our method is purely sample-based - leveraging the Sliced-Wasserstein distance to measure the discrepancy between the dataset and simulations - and thus suitable for simulators with intractable likelihoods. We benchmark our method on several tasks, and show that it can recover source distributions with substantially higher entropy than recent source estimation methods, without sacrificing the fidelity of the simulations. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of our approach, we infer source distributions for parameters of the Hodgkin-Huxley model from experimental datasets with hundreds of single-neuron measurements. In summary, we propose a principled method for inferring source distributions of scientific simulator parameters while retaining as much uncertainty as possible. Julius Vetter, Guy Moss 0001, Cornelius Schröder, Richard Gao, Jakob H. Macke |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | System Identification with Biophysical Constraints: A Circuit Model of the Inner RetinaabstractVisual processing in the retina has been studied in great detail at all levels such that a comprehensive picture of the retina's cell types and the many neural circuits they form is emerging. However, the currently best performing models of retinal function are black-box CNN models which are agnostic to such biological knowledge. In particular, these models typically neglect the role of the many inhibitory circuits involving amacrine cells and the biophysical mechanisms underlying synaptic release. Here, we present a computational model of temporal processing in the inner retina, including inhibitory feedback circuits and realistic synaptic release mechanisms. Fit to the responses of bipolar cells, the model generalized well to new stimuli including natural movie sequences, performing on par with or better than a benchmark black-box model. In pharmacology experiments, the model replicated in silico the effect of blocking specific amacrine cell populations with high fidelity, indicating that it had learned key circuit functions. Also, more in depth comparisons showed that connectivity patterns learned by the model were well matched to connectivity patterns extracted from connectomics data. Thus, our model provides a biologically interpretable data-driven account of temporal processing in the inner retina, filling the gap between purely black-box and detailed biophysical modeling. Cornelius Schröder, David A. Klindt, Sarah Strauß, Katrin Franke, Matthias Bethge, Thomas Euler, Philipp Berens |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Approximate Bayesian Inference for a Mechanistic Model of Vesicle Release at a Ribbon SynapseabstractThe inherent noise of neural systems makes it difficult to construct models which accurately capture experimental measurements of their activity. While much research has been done on how to efficiently model neural activity with descriptive models such as linear-nonlinear-models (LN), Bayesian inference for mechanistic models has received considerably less attention. One reason for this is that these models typically lead to intractable likelihoods and thus make parameter inference difficult. Here, we develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme for a fully stochastic, biophysically inspired model of glutamate release at the ribbon synapse, a highly specialized synapse found in different sensory systems. The model translates known structural features of the ribbon synapse into a set of stochastically coupled equations. We approximate the posterior distributions by updating a parametric prior distribution via Bayesian updating rules and show that model parameters can be efficiently estimated for synthetic and experimental data from in vivo two-photon experiments in the zebrafish retina. Also, we find that the model captures complex properties of the synaptic release such as the temporal precision and outperforms a standard GLM. Our framework provides a viable path forward for linking mechanistic models of neural activity to measured data. Cornelius Schröder, Ben James, Leon Lagnado, Philipp Berens |
NeurIPS | 1 |