VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Li Kevin Wenliang
dblp:255/7009 · also Li K. Wenliang
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Reinforcement learning · 16% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Learning Universal Predictors · ICML 2024 Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributions · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
bellman operator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Language Modeling Is Compression · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel embedding
mean embedding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning › sequence prediction
universal prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Universal Predictors · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean Embeddings · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributions · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
bayes-optimal prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributions · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
memory-based meta-learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributions · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network expressivity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › attention-based graph neural network
graph attention network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › trajectory prediction
multi-agent trajectory prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › social network analysis
social relation modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
trajectory prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-Sleep · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-Sleep · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-Sleep · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
sequential data generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
wake-sleep algorithm |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-Sleep · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning and data management
optimal transport |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2020 |
Coding theory › source coding
lossless compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Language Modeling Is Compression · ICLR 2024 |
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
chomsky hierarchy |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-Sleep · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
universal turing machine · 0.8temporal difference learning · 0.8sketch bellman operator · 0.8meta-learning · 0.8sequence prediction · 0.7log loss minimization · 0.7latent variable model · 0.5graph attention network · 0.5sinkhorn divergence · 0.4monte carlo · 0.4entropic regularization · 0.4amortised learning · 0.4adversarial training · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Language Modeling Is CompressionabstractIt has long been established that predictive models can be transformed into lossless compressors and vice versa. Incidentally, in recent years, the machine learning community has focused on training increasingly large and powerful self-supervised (language) models. Since these large language models exhibit impressive predictive capabilities, they are well-positioned to be strong compressors. In this work, we advocate for viewing the prediction problem through the lens of compression and evaluate the compression capabilities of large (foundation) models. We show that large language models are powerful general-purpose predictors and that the compression viewpoint provides novel insights into scaling laws, tokenization, and in-context learning. For example, Chinchilla 70B, while trained primarily on text, compresses ImageNet patches to 43.4% and LibriSpeech samples to 16.4% of their raw size, beating domain-specific compressors like PNG (58.5%) or FLAC (30.3%), respectively. Finally, we show that the prediction-compression equivalence allows us to use any compressor (like gzip) to build a conditional generative model. Grégoire Delétang, Anian Ruoss, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Elliot Catt, Tim Genewein, Christopher Mattern, Jordi Grau-Moya, Li Kevin Wenliang, Matthew Aitchison, Laurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Joel Veness |
ICLR | 8 |
| 2024 | Learning Universal PredictorsabstractMeta-learning has emerged as a powerful approach to train neural networks to learn new tasks quickly from limited data by pre-training them on a broad set of tasks. But, what are the limits of meta-learning? In this work, we explore the potential of amortizing the most powerful universal predictor, namely Solomonoff Induction (SI), into neural networks via leveraging (memory-based) meta-learning to its limits. We use Universal Turing Machines (UTMs) to generate training data used to expose networks to a broad range of patterns. We provide theoretical analysis of the UTM data generation processes and meta-training protocols. We conduct comprehensive experiments with neural architectures (e.g. LSTMs, Transformers) and algorithmic data generators of varying complexity and universality. Our results suggest that UTM data is a valuable resource for meta-learning, and that it can be used to train neural networks capable of learning universal prediction strategies. Jordi Grau-Moya, Tim Genewein, Marcus Hutter, Laurent Orseau, Grégoire Delétang, Elliot Catt, Anian Ruoss, Li Kevin Wenliang, Christopher Mattern, Matthew Aitchison, Joel Veness |
ICML | 8 |
| 2024 | Distributional Bellman Operators over Mean EmbeddingsabstractWe propose a novel algorithmic framework for distributional reinforcement learning, based on learning finite-dimensional mean embeddings of return distributions. The framework reveals a wide variety of new algorithms for dynamic programming and temporal-difference algorithms that rely on the sketch Bellman operator, which updates mean embeddings with simple linear-algebraic computations. We provide asymptotic convergence theory, and examine the empirical performance of the algorithms on a suite of tabular tasks. Further, we show that this approach can be straightforwardly combined with deep reinforcement learning. Li Kevin Wenliang, Grégoire Delétang, Matthew Aitchison, Marcus Hutter, Anian Ruoss, Arthur Gretton, Mark Rowland 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy
Grégoire Delétang, Anian Ruoss, Jordi Grau-Moya, Tim Genewein, Li Kevin Wenliang, Elliot Catt, Chris Cundy, Marcus Hutter, Shane Legg, Joel Veness, Pedro A. Ortega |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2023 | Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary DistributionsabstractMemory-based meta-learning is a technique for approximating Bayes-optimal predictors. Under fairly general conditions, minimizing sequential prediction error, measured by the log loss, leads to implicit meta-learning. The goal of this work is to investigate how far this interpretation can be realized by current sequence prediction models and training regimes. The focus is on piecewise stationary sources with unobserved switching-points, which arguably capture an important characteristic of natural language and action-observation sequences in partially observable environments. We show that various types of memory-based neural models, including Transformers, LSTMs, and RNNs can learn to accurately approximate known Bayes-optimal algorithms and behave as if performing Bayesian inference over the latent switching-points and the latent parameters governing the data distribution within each segment. Tim Genewein, Grégoire Delétang, Anian Ruoss, Li Kevin Wenliang, Elliot Catt, Vincent Dutordoir, Jordi Grau-Moya, Laurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Joel Veness |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | GRIN: Generative Relation and Intention Network for Multi-agent Trajectory PredictionabstractLearning the distribution of future trajectories conditioned on the past is a crucial problem for understanding multi-agent systems. This is challenging because humans make decisions based on complex social relations and personal intents, resulting in highly complex uncertainties over trajectories. To address this problem, we propose a conditional deep generative model that combines advances in graph neural networks. The prior and recognition model encodes two types of latent codes for each agent: an inter-agent latent code to represent social relations and an intra-agent latent code to represent agent intentions. The decoder is carefully devised to leverage the codes in a disentangled way to predict multi-modal future trajectory distribution. Specifically, a graph attention network built upon inter-agent latent code is used to learn continuous pair-wise relations, and an agent's motion is controlled by its latent intents and its observations of all other agents. Through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, we show that our model outperforms previous work in multiple performance metrics. We also show that our model generates realistic multi-modal trajectories. Longyuan Li, Jian Yao 0004, Li Kevin Wenliang, Tong He 0002, Tianjun Xiao, Junchi Yan, David P. Wipf, Zheng Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Amortised Learning by Wake-SleepabstractModels that employ latent variables to capture structure in observed data lie at the heart of many current unsupervised learning algorithms, but exact maximum-likelihood learning for powerful and flexible latent-variable models is almost always intractable. Thus, state-of-the-art approaches either abandon the maximum-likelihood framework entirely, or else rely on a variety of variational approximations to the posterior distribution over the latents. Here, we propose an alternative approach that we call amortised learning. Rather than computing an approximation to the posterior over latents, we use a wake-sleep Monte-Carlo strategy to learn a function that directly estimates the maximum-likelihood parameter updates. Amortised learning is possible whenever samples of latents and observations can be simulated from the generative model, treating the model as a “black box”. We demonstrate its effectiveness on a wide range of complex models, including those with latents that are discrete or supported on non-Euclidean spaces. Li Kevin Wenliang, Ted Moskovitz, Heishiro Kanagawa, Maneesh Sahani |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | COT-GAN: Generating Sequential Data via Causal Optimal TransportabstractWe introduce COT-GAN, an adversarial algorithm to train implicit generative models optimized for producing sequential data. The loss function of this algorithm is formulated using ideas from Causal Optimal Transport (COT), which combines classic optimal transport methods with an additional temporal causality constraint. Remarkably, we find that this causality condition provides a natural framework to parameterize the cost function that is learned by the discriminator as a robust (worst-case) distance, and an ideal mechanism for learning time dependent data distributions. Following Genevay et al. (2018), we also include an entropic penalization term which allows for the use of the Sinkhorn algorithm when computing the optimal transport cost. Our experiments show effectiveness and stability of COT-GAN when generating both low- and high-dimensional time-series data. The success of the algorithm also relies on a new, improved version of the Sinkhorn divergence which demonstrates less bias in learning. Tianlin Xu, Li Kevin Wenliang, Michael Munn, Beatrice Acciaio |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | A neurally plausible model for online recognition and postdiction in a dynamical environmentabstractHumans and other animals are frequently near-optimal in their ability to integrate noisy and ambiguous sensory data to form robust percepts---which are informed both by sensory evidence and by prior expectations about the structure of the environment. It is suggested that the brain does so using the statistical structure provided by an internal model of how latent, causal factors produce the observed patterns. In dynamic environments, such integration often takes the form of \emph{postdiction}, wherein later sensory evidence affects inferences about earlier percepts. As the brain must operate in current time, without the luxury of acausal propagation of information, how does such postdictive inference come about? Here, we propose a general framework for neural probabilistic inference in dynamic models based on the distributed distributional code (DDC) representation of uncertainty, naturally extending the underlying encoding to incorporate implicit probabilistic beliefs about both present and past. We show that, as in other uses of the DDC, an inferential model can be learnt efficiently using samples from an internal model of the world. Applied to stimuli used in the context of psychophysics experiments, the framework provides an online and plausible mechanism for inference, including postdictive effects. Li Kevin Wenliang, Maneesh Sahani |
NeurIPS | 1 |