Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Santosh K. Srivastava
dblp:255/7069
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 86% Information extraction and text analysis · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › distributed knowledge representation
knowledge base embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Inductive Quantum Embedding · NeurIPS 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
statistical relational learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum logic |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for Reasoning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity typing
fine-grained entity typing |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Inductive Quantum Embedding · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical relational learning · 0.8quantum logic · 0.8inductive learning · 0.4geometric analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Inductive Quantum EmbeddingabstractQuantum logic inspired embedding (aka Quantum Embedding (QE)) of a Knowledge-Base (KB) was proposed recently by Garg:2019. It is claimed that the QE preserves the logical structure of the input KB given in the form of unary and binary predicates hierarchy. Such structure preservation allows one to perform Boolean logic style deductive reasoning directly over these embedding vectors. The original QE idea, however, is limited to the transductive (not inductive) setting. Moreover, the original QE scheme runs quite slow on real applications involving millions of entities. This paper alleviates both of these key limitations. We start by reformulating the original QE problem to allow for the induction. On the way, we also underscore some interesting analytic and geometric properties of the solution and leverage them to design a faster training scheme. As an application, we show that one can achieve state-of-the-art performance on the well-known NLP task of fine-grained entity type classification by using the inductive QE approach. Our training runs 9-times faster than the original QE scheme on this task. Santosh K. Srivastava, Dinesh Khandelwal, Dhiraj Madan, Dinesh Garg, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Quantum Embedding of Knowledge for ReasoningabstractStatistical Relational Learning (SRL) methods are the most widely used techniques to generate distributional representations of the symbolic Knowledge Bases (KBs). These methods embed any given KB into a vector space by exploiting statistical similarities among its entities and predicates but without any guarantee of preserving the underlying logical structure of the KB. This, in turn, results in poor performance of logical reasoning tasks that are solved using such distributional representations. We present a novel approach called Embed2Reason (E2R) that embeds a symbolic KB into a vector space in a logical structure preserving manner. This approach is inspired by the theory of Quantum Logic. Such an embedding allows answering membership based complex logical reasoning queries with impressive accuracy improvements over popular SRL baselines. Dinesh Garg, Shajith Ikbal, Santosh K. Srivastava, Harit Vishwakarma, Hima P. Karanam, L. Venkata Subramaniam |
NeurIPS | 3 |