VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Oberstraß
dblp:255/7564
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0712-034XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computational photography and imaging · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
conditional GAN |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase Retrieval · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Computational photography and imaging
phase retrieval |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase Retrieval · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization-based reconstruction · 1.3conditional GAN · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Learning Conditional Generative Models for Phase RetrievalabstractReconstructing images from magnitude measurements is an important and difficult problem arising in many research areas, such as X-ray crystallography, astronomical imaging and more. While optimization-based approaches often struggle with the non-convexity and non- linearity of the problem, learning-based approaches are able to produce reconstructions of high quality for data similar to a given training dataset. In this work, we analyze a class of methods based on conditional generative adversarial networks (CGAN). We show how the benefits of optimization-based and learning-based methods can be combined to improve reconstruction quality. Furthermore, we show that these combined methods are able to generalize to out-of-distribution data and analyze their robustness to measurement noise. In addition to that, we compare how the methods are impacted by missing measurements. Extensive ablation studies demonstrate that all components of our approach are essential and justify the choice of network architecture. Tobias Uelwer, Sebastian Konietzny, Alexander Oberstraß, Stefan Harmeling |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2020 | Phase Retrieval Using Conditional Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractIn this paper, we propose the application of conditional generative adversarial networks to solve various phase retrieval problems. We show that including knowledge of the measurement process at training time leads to an optimization at test time that is more robust to initialization than existing approaches involving generative models. In addition, conditioning the generator network on the measurements enables us to achieve much more detailed results. We empirically demonstrate that these advantages provide meaningful solutions to the Fourier and the compressive phase retrieval problem and that our method outperforms well-established projection-based methods as well as existing methods that are based on neural networks. Like other deep learning methods, our approach is robust to noise and can therefore be useful for real-world applications. Tobias Uelwer, Alexander Oberstraß, Stefan Harmeling |
ICPR | 2 |