Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Philip Stier
dblp:255/9214
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1191-0128ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sensitivity analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued Interventions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued Interventions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
causal inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued Interventions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
latent confounders |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued Interventions · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty-aware deep model · 1.1neural network · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Invertible Neural Networks for Probabilistic Aerosol Optical Depth RetrievalabstractSatellite remote sensing is the primary source of global aerosol observations, providing essential data for understanding aerosol-climate interactions and constraining global climate models. To solve the inverse problem at the heart of the retrieval process, traditional algorithms must make simplifications and often cannot quantify uncertainty. In this study, we explore the use of invertible neural networks (INNs) for retrieving aerosol optical depth (AOD) from spectral top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance. INNs can handle the inherent uncertainty of underdetermined inverse problems. They model the forward and inverse processes simultaneously while learning additional random latent variables used to recover full nonparametric posterior distributions for the inverse predictions. We develop location-specific INNs for MODIS sensor data, training on synthetic datasets generated by combining atmospheric reflectance from MODIS dark target (DT) lookup tables (LUTs) and surface reflectance from a MODIS bidirectional reflectance product. The INNs successfully emulate the forward problem and achieve accurate AOD inversion results on synthetic test sets (RMSE$\approx ~0.05$). The posterior distributions obtained are reliable (mean absolute calibration error (MACE)$\approx ~2.5$%), efficiently providing informative predictive uncertainty estimates. In addition, the INNs’ invertible architecture is found to promote physically consistent predictions and uncertainties. To further validate them in a real-world context, the INNs are applied to MODIS L1B reflectance observations to produce full-resolution AOD estimates with pixel-level uncertainties. The retrievals are compared to collocated ground measurements from the Aeronet network. The INNs obtain good accuracy in all tested locations in line with the operational DT AOD product (RMSE$\approx ~0.1$, 74% within DT expected error (EE) bounds). The INNs are also able to retrieve AOD over bright surfaces where DT cannot be applied. Despite uncovered limitations out-of-distribution, the INNs show consistent skill in target domains across diverse land surfaces. The INNs’ unique modeling and uncertainty quantification features have the potential to enhance aerosol and climate studies in various real-world contexts. Paolo Pelucchi, Jorge Vicent 0001, Philip Stier, Gustau Camps-Valls |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 3 |
| 2022 | Scalable Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Causal-Effect Estimates of Continuous-Valued InterventionsabstractEstimating the effects of continuous-valued interventions from observational data is a critically important task for climate science, healthcare, and economics. Recent work focuses on designing neural network architectures and regularization functions to allow for scalable estimation of average and individual-level dose-response curves from high-dimensional, large-sample data. Such methodologies assume ignorability (observation of all confounding variables) and positivity (observation of all treatment levels for every covariate value describing a set of units), assumptions problematic in the continuous treatment regime. Scalable sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to understand the ignorance induced in causal estimates when these assumptions are relaxed are less studied. Here, we develop a continuous treatment-effect marginal sensitivity model (CMSM) and derive bounds that agree with the observed data and a researcher-defined level of hidden confounding. We introduce a scalable algorithm and uncertainty-aware deep models to derive and estimate these bounds for high-dimensional, large-sample observational data. We work in concert with climate scientists interested in the climatological impacts of human emissions on cloud properties using satellite observations from the past 15 years. This problem is known to be complicated by many unobserved confounders. Andrew Jesson, Alyson Douglas, Peter Manshausen, Maëlys Solal, Nicolai Meinshausen, Philip Stier, Yarin Gal, Uri Shalit |
NeurIPS | 6 |