Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leo Feng
dblp:255/9367
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 28% Generative modeling · 22% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Tree Cross Attention · ICLR 2024 Latent Bottlenecked Attentive Neural Processes · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Memory Efficient Neural Processes via Constant Memory Attention Block · ICML 2024 Latent Bottlenecked Attentive Neural Processes · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 Exploration in Approximate Hyper-State Space for Meta Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 Exploration in Approximate Hyper-State Space for Meta Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
amortized sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
cross-attention |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Tree Cross Attention · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Memory Efficient Neural Processes via Constant Memory Attention Block · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Better Selective Classification · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Continuous-Time Meta-Learning with Forward Mode Differentiation · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
mode coverage |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
latent representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Tree Cross Attention · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cross-attention · 1.5off-policy reinforcement learning · 0.9generative flow networks · 0.9adaptive teacher-student curriculum · 0.9tree search · 0.8permutation invariant attention · 0.8latent bottleneck · 0.7forward-mode differentiation · 0.6meta-learning · 0.5hyper-state · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Adaptive teachers for amortized samplersabstractAmortized inference is the task of training a parametric model, such as a neural network, to approximate a distribution with a given unnormalized density where exact sampling is intractable. When sampling is modeled as a sequential decision-making process, reinforcement learning (RL) methods, such as generative flow networks, can be used to train the sampling policy. Off-policy RL training facilitates the discovery of diverse, high-reward candidates, but existing methods still face challenges in efficient exploration. We propose to use an adaptive training distribution (the Teacher) to guide the training of the primary amortized sampler (the Student). The Teacher, an auxiliary behavior model, is trained to sample high-loss regions of the Student and can generalize across unexplored modes, thereby enhancing mode coverage by providing an efficient training curriculum. We validate the effectiveness of this approach in a synthetic environment designed to present an exploration challenge, two diffusion-based sampling tasks, and four biochemical discovery tasks demonstrating its ability to improve sample efficiency and mode coverage. Source code is available at https://github.com/alstn12088/adaptive-teacher. Minsu Kim 0004, Sanghyeok Choi, Taeyoung Yun, Emmanuel Bengio, Leo Feng, Jarrid Rector-Brooks, Sungsoo Ahn, Jinkyoo Park, Nikolay Malkin, Yoshua Bengio |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2024 | Tree Cross AttentionabstractCross Attention is a popular method for retrieving information from a set of context tokens for making predictions. At inference time, for each prediction, Cross Attention scans the full set of $\mathcal{O}(N)$ tokens. In practice, however, often only a small subset of tokens are required for good performance.
Methods such as Perceiver IO are cheap at inference as they distill the information to a smaller-sized set of latent tokens $L < N$ on which cross attention is then applied, resulting in only $\mathcal{O}(L)$ complexity.
However, in practice, as the number of input tokens and the amount of information to distill increases, the number of latent tokens needed also increases significantly.
In this work, we propose Tree Cross Attention (TCA) - a module based on Cross Attention that only retrieves information from a logarithmic $\mathcal{O}(\log(N))$ number of tokens for performing inference.
TCA organizes the data in a tree structure and performs a tree search at inference time to retrieve the relevant tokens for prediction.
Leveraging TCA, we introduce ReTreever, a flexible architecture for token-efficient inference.
We show empirically that Tree Cross Attention (TCA) performs comparable to Cross Attention across various classification and uncertainty regression tasks while being significantly more token-efficient.
Furthermore, we compare ReTreever against Perceiver IO, showing significant gains while using the same number of tokens for inference. Leo Feng, Frederick Tung, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Yoshua Bengio, Mohamed Osama Ahmed |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Memory Efficient Neural Processes via Constant Memory Attention BlockabstractNeural Processes (NPs) are popular meta-learning methods for efficiently modelling predictive uncertainty. Recent state-of-the-art methods, however, leverage expensive attention mechanisms, limiting their applications, particularly in low-resource settings. In this work, we propose Constant Memory Attentive Neural Processes (CMANPs), an NP variant that only requires constant memory. To do so, we first propose an efficient update operation for Cross Attention. Leveraging the update operation, we propose Constant Memory Attention Block (CMAB), a novel attention block that (i) is permutation invariant, (ii) computes its output in constant memory, and (iii) performs constant computation updates. Finally, building on CMAB, we detail Constant Memory Attentive Neural Processes. Empirically, we show CMANPs achieve state-of-the-art results on popular NP benchmarks while being significantly more memory efficient than prior methods. Leo Feng, Frederick Tung, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Yoshua Bengio, Mohamed Osama Ahmed |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards Better Selective Classification
Leo Feng, Mohamed Osama Ahmed, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Amir H. Abdi |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Latent Bottlenecked Attentive Neural Processes
Leo Feng, Hossein Hajimirsadeghi, Yoshua Bengio, Mohamed Osama Ahmed |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Continuous-Time Meta-Learning with Forward Mode Differentiation
Tristan Deleu, David Kanaa, Leo Feng, Giancarlo Kerg, Yoshua Bengio, Guillaume Lajoie, Pierre-Luc Bacon |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Exploration in Approximate Hyper-State Space for Meta Reinforcement LearningabstractTo rapidly learn a new task, it is often essential for agents to explore efficiently - especially when performance matters from the first timestep. One way to learn such behaviour is via meta-learning. Many existing methods however rely on dense rewards for meta-training, and can fail catastrophically if the rewards are sparse. Without a suitable reward signal, the need for exploration during meta-training is exacerbated. To address this, we propose HyperX, which uses novel reward bonuses for meta-training to explore in approximate hyper-state space (where hyper-states represent the environment state and the agent’s task belief). We show empirically that HyperX meta-learns better task-exploration and adapts more successfully to new tasks than existing methods. Luisa M. Zintgraf, Leo Feng, Cong Lu, Maximilian Igl, Kristian Hartikainen, Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-LearningabstractTrading off exploration and exploitation in an unknown environment is key to maximising expected online return during learning. A Bayes-optimal policy, which does so optimally, conditions its actions not only on the environment state but also on the agent's uncertainty about the environment. Computing a Bayes-optimal policy is however intractable for all but the smallest tasks. In this paper, we introduce variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL (variBAD), a way to meta-learn approximately Bayes-optimal policies for complex tasks. VariBAD simultaneously meta-learns a variational auto-encoder to perform approximate inference, and a policy that incorporates task uncertainty directly during action selection by conditioning on both the environment state and the approximate belief. In two toy domains, we illustrate how variBAD performs structured online exploration as a function of task uncertainty. We further evaluate variBAD on MuJoCo tasks widely used in meta-RL and show that it achieves higher online return than existing methods. On the recently proposed Meta-World ML1 benchmark, variBAD achieves state of the art results by a large margin, fully solving two out of the three ML1 tasks for the first time. Luisa M. Zintgraf, Sebastian Schulze, Cong Lu, Leo Feng, Maximilian Igl, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Yarin Gal, Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |