VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marvin Geiselhart
dblp:256/5147
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9055-619XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Cellular and mobile networks · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › channel coding
polar codes |
1.8 | 3 | 2025 | Row-Merged Polar Codes: Analysis, Design, and Decoder Implementation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 Trends in Channel Coding for 6G · Proc. IEEE 2024 Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
code construction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Row-Merged Polar Codes: Analysis, Design, and Decoder Implementation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
weight distribution |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Row-Merged Polar Codes: Analysis, Design, and Decoder Implementation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Coding theory
channel coding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Trends in Channel Coding for 6G · Proc. IEEE 2024 |
Coding theory › channel coding
finite blocklength coding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Trends in Channel Coding for 6G · Proc. IEEE 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Trends in Channel Coding for 6G · Proc. IEEE 2024 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding
belief propagation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
channel decoding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
decoding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-muller codes |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › list decoding
successive cancellation list decoding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Row-Merged Polar Codes: Analysis, Design, and Decoder Implementation · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025 |
Cellular and mobile networks
6g |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Trends in Channel Coding for 6G · Proc. IEEE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automorphism ensemble decoding · 2.0successive cancellation list decoding · 1.4unrolled pipelined architecture · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Row-Merged Polar Codes: Analysis, Design, and Decoder ImplementationabstractRow-merged polar codes are a family of pre-transformed polar codes (PTPCs) with little precoding overhead. Providing an improved distance spectrum over plain polar codes, they are capable to perform close to the finite-length capacity bounds. However, there is still a lack of efficient design procedures for row-merged polar codes. Using novel weight enumeration algorithms with low computational complexity, we propose a design methodology for row-merged polar codes that directly considers their minimum distance properties. The codes significantly outperform state-of-the-art cyclic redundancy check (CRC)-aided polar codes under successive cancellation list (SCL) decoding in error-correction performance. Furthermore, we present fast simplified successive cancellation list (Fast-SSCL) decoding of PTPCs, based on which we derive a high-throughput, unrolled architecture template for fully pipelined decoders. Implementation results of SCL decoders for row-merged polar codes in a 12nm technology additionally demonstrate the superiority of these codes with respect to the implementation costs, compared to state-of-the-art reference decoder implementations. Andreas Zunker, Marvin Geiselhart, Lucas Johannsen, Claus Kestel, Stephan ten Brink, Timo Vogt, Norbert Wehn |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |
| 2024 | Graph Neural Network-Based Joint Equalization and DecodingabstractThis paper proposes to use graph neural networks (GNNs) for equalization, that can also be used to perform joint equalization and decoding (JED). For equalization, the GNN is build upon the factor graph representations of the channel, while for JED, the factor graph is expanded by the Tanner graph of the parity-check matrix (PCM) of the channel code, sharing the variable nodes (VNs). A particularly advantageous property of the GNN is the robustness against cycles in the factor graphs which is the main problem for belief propagation (BP)-based equalization. As a result of having a fully deep learning-based receiver, joint optimization instead of individual optimization of the components is enabled, so-called end-to-end learning. Furthermore, we propose a parallel flooding schedule that further reduces the latency, which turns out to improve also the error correcting performance. The proposed approach is analyzed and compared to state-of-the-art baselines in terms of error correcting capability and latency. At a fixed low latency, the flooding GNN for JED demonstrates a gain of 2.25 dB in bit error rate (BER) compared to an iterative Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv (BCJR)-BP baseline. Jannis Clausius, Marvin Geiselhart, Daniel Tandler, Stephan ten Brink |
ISIT | 2 |
| 2024 | Trends in Channel Coding for 6GabstractError correction coding (i.e., channel coding) is a key ingredient of any digital communications system. In mobile wireless communications, channel codes have evolved from simple convolutional codes in Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) (2G), parallel concatenated (turbo) codes in Universal Mobile Telecommunications Service (UMTS) (3G), and long-term evolution (LTE) (4G), to carefully designed multirate/multilength low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes in 5G, combined with polar codes for short messages on the synchronization channel. Based on this rich history, and by accounting for the technological advances in very large-scale integration, this article will outline some recent trends in channel coding as they may be applied in 6G systems, ranging from novel approaches for short blocklengths such as automorphism ensemble decoding, via ideas of coding for multiple access, to concepts for unified coding schemes that may simplify encoding/decoding hardware at competitive error-correcting performance. Sisi Miao, Claus Kestel, Lucas Johannsen, Marvin Geiselhart, Laurent Schmalen, Alexios Balatsoukas-Stimming, Gianluigi Liva, Norbert Wehn, Stephan ten Brink |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |
| 2022 | A Polar Subcode Approach to Belief Propagation List DecodingabstractPermutation decoding gained recent interest as it can exploit the symmetries of a code in a parallel fashion. Moreover, it has been shown that by viewing permuted polar codes as polar subcodes, the set of usable permutations in permutation decoding can be increased. We extend this idea to pre-transformed polar codes, such as cyclic redundancy check (CRC)-aided polar codes, which previously could not be decoded using permutations due to their lack of automorphisms. Using belief propagation (BP)-based subdecoders, we showcase a performance close to CRC-aided SCL (CA-SCL) decoding. The proposed algorithm outperforms the previously best performing iterative CRC-aided belief propagation list (CA-BPL) decoder both in error-rate performance and decoding latency. Marvin Geiselhart, Ahmed Elkelesh, Jannis Clausius, Stephan ten Brink |
ITW | 1 |
| 2021 | On the Automorphism Group of Polar CodesabstractThe automorphism group of a code is the set of permutations of the codeword symbols that map the whole code onto itself. For polar codes, only a part of the automorphism group was known, namely the lower-triangular affine group (LTA), which is solely based upon the partial order of the code's synthetic channels. Depending on the design, however, polar codes can have a richer set of automorphisms. In this paper, we extend the LTA to a larger subgroup of the general affine group (GA), namely the block lower-triangular affine group (BLTA) and show that it is contained in the automorphism group of polar codes. Furthermore, we provide a low complexity algorithm for finding this group for a given information/frozen set and determining its size. Most importantly, we apply these findings in automorphism-based decoding of polar codes and report a comparable error-rate performance to that of successive cancellation list (SCL) decoding with significantly lower complexity. Marvin Geiselhart, Ahmed Elkelesh, Moustafa Ebada, Sebastian Cammerer, Stephan ten Brink |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2021 | Automorphism Ensemble Decoding of Reed-Muller CodesabstractReed–Muller (RM) codes are known for their good maximum likelihood (ML) performance in the short block-length regime. Despite being one of the oldest classes of channel codes, finding a low complexity soft-input decoding scheme is still an open problem. In this work, we present a versatile decoding architecture for RM codes based on their rich automorphism group. The decoding algorithm can be seen as a generalization of multiple-bases belief propagation (MBBP) and may use any polar or RM decoder as constituent decoders. We provide extensive error-rate performance simulations for successive cancellation (SC)-, SC-list (SCL)- and belief propagation (BP)-based constituent decoders. We furthermore compare our results to existing decoding schemes and report a near-ML performance for the RM(3,7)-code (e.g., 0.04 dB away from the ML bound at BLER of 10−3) at a competitive computational cost. Moreover, we provide some insights into the automorphism subgroups of RM codes and SC decoding and, thereby, prove the theoretical limitations of this method with respect to polar codes. Marvin Geiselhart, Ahmed Elkelesh, Moustafa Ebada, Sebastian Cammerer, Stephan ten Brink |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 2020 | CRC-Aided Belief Propagation List Decoding of Polar CodesabstractAlthough iterative decoding of polar codes has recently made huge progress based on the idea of permuted factor graphs, it still suffers from a non-negligible performance degradation when compared to state-of-the-art CRC-aided successive cancellation list (CA-SCL) decoding. In this work, we show that iterative decoding of polar codes based on the belief propagation list (BPL) algorithm can approach the error-rate performance of CA-SCL decoding and, thus, can be efficiently used for decoding the standardized 5G polar codes. Rather than only utilizing the cyclic redundancy check (CRC) as a stopping condition (i.e., for error-detection), we also aim to benefit from the error-correction capabilities of the outer CRC code. For this, we develop two distinct soft-decision CRC decoding algorithms: a Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv (BCJR)-based approach and a sum product algorithm (SPA)-based approach. Further, an optimized selection of permuted factor graphs is analyzed and shown to reduce the decoding complexity significantly. Finally, we benchmark the proposed CRC-aided belief propagation list (CA-BPL) decoding to state-of-the-art 5G polar codes under CA-SCL decoding and, thereby, showcase an error-rate performance not just close to the CA-SCL but also close to the maximum likelihood (ML) bound as estimated by ordered statistic decoding (OSD). Marvin Geiselhart, Ahmed Elkelesh, Moustafa Ebada, Sebastian Cammerer, Stephan ten Brink |
ISIT | 1 |