Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias Weissenbacher
dblp:256/5242
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalization in reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SiT: Symmetry-invariant Transformers for Generalisation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SiT: Symmetry-invariant Transformers for Generalisation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-free reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Koopman Q-learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Koopman Q-learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Koopman Q-learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.8graph symmetric attention · 0.8latent representation learning · 0.6koopman theory · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SiT: Symmetry-invariant Transformers for Generalisation in Reinforcement LearningabstractAn open challenge in reinforcement learning (RL) is the effective deployment of a trained policy to new or slightly different situations as well as semantically-similar environments. We introduce **S**ymmetry-**I**nvariant **T**ransformer (**SiT**), a scalable vision transformer (ViT) that leverages both local and global data patterns in a self-supervised manner to improve generalisation. Central to our approach is Graph Symmetric Attention, which refines the traditional self-attention mechanism to preserve graph symmetries, resulting in invariant and equivariant latent representations. We showcase SiT's superior generalization over ViTs on MiniGrid and Procgen RL benchmarks, and its sample efficiency on Atari 100k and CIFAR10. Matthias Weissenbacher, Rishabh Agarwal, Yoshinobu Kawahara |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Koopman Q-learning: Offline Reinforcement Learning via Symmetries of DynamicsabstractOffline reinforcement learning leverages large datasets to train policies without interactions with the environment. The learned policies may then be deployed in real-world settings where interactions are costly or dangerous. Current algorithms over-fit to the training dataset and as a consequence perform poorly when deployed to out-of-distribution generalizations of the environment. We aim to address these limitations by learning a Koopman latent representation which allows us to infer symmetries of the system’s underlying dynamic. The latter is then utilized to extend the otherwise static offline dataset during training; this constitutes a novel data augmentation framework which reflects the system’s dynamic and is thus to be interpreted as an exploration of the environments phase space. To obtain the symmetries we employ Koopman theory in which nonlinear dynamics are represented in terms of a linear operator acting on the space of measurement functions of the system. We provide novel theoretical results on the existence and nature of symmetries relevant for control systems such as reinforcement learning settings. Moreover, we empirically evaluate our method on several benchmark offline reinforcement learning tasks and datasets including D4RL, Metaworld and Robosuite and find that by using our framework we consistently improve the state-of-the-art of model-free Q-learning methods. Matthias Weissenbacher, Samarth Sinha, Animesh Garg, Yoshinobu Kawahara |
ICML | 1 |