Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rohit Shere

dblp:256/6220 · also Rohit Prakash Shere · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis
0.412019
BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements elicitation
requirements extraction
0.412019
BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules · ASE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.4semantic querying · 0.4natural language processing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 BuRRiTo: A Framework to Extract, Specify, Verify and Analyze Business Rules
abstract
An enterprise system operates business by providing various services that are guided by set of certain business rules (BR) and constraints. These BR are usually written using plain Natural Language in operating procedures, terms and conditions, and other documents or in source code of legacy enterprise systems. For implementing the BR in a software system, expressing them as UML use-case specifications, or preparing for Merger & Acquisition (M&A) activity, analysts manually interpret the documents or try to identify constraints from the source code, leading to potential discrepancies and ambiguities. These issues in the software system can be resolved only after testing, which is a very tedious and expensive activity. To minimize such errors and efforts, we propose BuRRiTo framework consisting of automatic extraction of BR by mining documents and source code, ability to clean them of various anomalies like inconsistency, redundancies, conflicts, etc. and able to analyze the functional gaps present and performing semantic querying and searching.
Pavan Kumar Chittimalli, Kritika Anand, Shrishti Pradhan, Sayandeep Mitra, Chandan Prakash, Rohit Shere, Ravindra Naik
ASE6