Everyday digital feminism refers to the ordinary, often pragmatic ways women articulate lived experiences and cultivate solidarity in online spaces. In China, such practices flourish on RedNote through discussions under hashtags like “women’s growth”. Recently, DeepSeek-generated content has been taken up as a new voice in these conversations. Given widely recognized gender biases in LLMs, this raises critical concerns about how LLMs interact with everyday feminist practices. Through an analysis of 430 RedNote posts, 139 shared DeepSeek responses, and 3211 comments, we found that users predominantly welcomed DeepSeek’s advice. Yet feminist critical discourse analysis revealed that these responses primarily encouraged women to self-optimize and pursue achievements within prevailing norms rather than challenge them. By interpreting this case, we discuss the opportunities and risks that LLMs introduce for everyday feminism as a pathway toward women’s empowerment, and offer design implications for leveraging LLMs to better support such practices.

Traditional AI-assisted decision-making systems often provide fixed recommendations that users must either accept or reject entirely, limiting meaningful interaction - especially in cases of disagreement. To address this, we introduce Human-AI Deliberation, an approach inspired by human deliberation theories that enables dimension-level opinion elicitation, iterative decision updates, and structured discussions between humans and AI. At the core of this approach is Deliberative AI, an assistant powered by large language models (LLMs) that facilitates flexible, conversational interactions and precise information exchange with domain-specific models. Through a mixed-methods user study, we found that Deliberative AI outperforms traditional explainable AI (XAI) systems by fostering appropriate human reliance and improving task performance. By analyzing participant perceptions, user experience, and open-ended feedback, we highlight key findings, discuss potential concerns, and explore the broader applicability of this approach for future AI-assisted decision-making systems.

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in K-6 project-based art courses presents both opportunities and challenges for enhancing creativity, engagement, and group collaboration. This study introduces a four-phase field study, involving in total two experienced K-6 art teachers and 132 students in eight offline course sessions, to investigate the usage and impact of GenAI. Specifically, based on findings in Phases 1 and 2, we developed AskArt , an interactive interface that combines DALL-E and GPT and is tailored to support elementary school students in their art projects, and deployed it in Phases 3 and 4. Our findings revealed the benefits of GenAI in providing background information, inspirations, and personalized guidance. However, challenges in query formulation for generating expected content were also observed. Moreover, students employed varied collaboration strategies, and teachers noted increased engagement alongside concerns regarding misuse and interface suitability. This study offers insights into the effective integration of GenAI in elementary education, presents AskArt as a practical tool, and provides recommendations for educators and researchers to enhance project-based learning with GenAI technologies.

Reading and repeatedly retelling a short story is a common and effective approach to learning the meanings and usages of target words. However, learners often struggle with comprehending, recalling, and retelling the story contexts of these target words. Inspired by the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, we propose a computational workflow to generate relevant images paired with stories. Based on the workflow, we work with learners and teachers to iteratively design an interactive vocabulary learning system named RetAssist. It can generate sentence-level images of a story to facilitate the understanding and recall of the target words in the story retelling practices. Our within-subjects study (N=24) shows that compared to a baseline system without generative images, RetAssist significantly improves learners’ fluency in expressing with target words. Participants also feel that RetAssist eases their learning workload and is more useful. We discuss insights into leveraging text-to-image generative models to support learning tasks.

Online design communities, where members exchange free-form views on others' designs, offer a space for beginners to learn visual design. However, the content of these communities is often unorganized for learners, containing many redundancies and irrelevant comments. In this paper, we propose a computational approach for leveraging online design communities to run a conversational agent that assists informal learning of visual elements (e.g., color and space). Our method extracts critiques, suggestions, and rationales on visual elements from comments. We present DesignQuizzer, which asks questions about visual design in UI examples and provides structured comment summaries. Two user studies demonstrate the engagement and usefulness of DesignQuizzer compared with the baseline (reading reddit.com/r/UI_design). We also showcase how effectively novices can apply what they learn with DesignQuizzer in a design critique task and a visual design task. We discuss how to use our approach with other communities and offer design considerations for community-powered learning support tools.