A universe of propositions equipped with definitional proof irrelevance constitutes a convenient medium to express properties and proofs in type-theoretic proof assistants such as Lean, Rocq, and Agda. However, allowing accessibility predicates - used to establish semantic termination arguments - to inhabit such a universe yields undecidable typechecking, hampering the predictability and foundational bases of a proof assistant. To effectively reconcile definitional proof irrelevance and accessibility predicates with both theoretical foundations and practicality in mind, we describe a type theory that extends the Calculus of Inductive Constructions featuring observational equality in a universe of strict propositions, with two variants for handling the elimination principle of accessibility predicates: one variant safeguards decidability by sticking to propositional unfolding, and the other variant favors flexibility with definitional unfolding, at the expense of a potentially diverging typechecking procedure. Crucially, the metatheory of this dual approach establishes that any proof made in the definitional variant of the theory can be translated into a proof of the same statement in the propositional variant, all while preserving the decidability of the latter. Moreover, we prove the two variants to be consistent and to satisfy forms of canonicity, ensuring that programs can indeed be properly evaluated. We present an implementation in Rocq and compare it with existing approaches. Overall, this work introduces an effective technique that informs the design of proof assistants with strict propositions, enabling local computation with accessibility predicates without compromising the ambient type theory.

The metatheory of dependent types has seen a lot of progress in recent years. In particular, the development of categorical gluing finally lets us work with semantic presentations of type theory (such as categories with families) to establish fundamental properties of type theory such as canonicity and normalisation. However, proofs by gluing have yet to reach the stage of computer formalisation: formal proofs for the metatheory of dependent types are still stuck in the age of tedious syntactic proofs. The main reason for this is that semantic presentations of type theory are defined using sophisticated indexed inductive types, which are prone to “transport hell”. In this paper, we introduce a new technique to work with CwFs in intensional type theory without getting stuck in transport hell. More specifically, we construct an alternative presentation of the initial CwF which encodes the substitutions as metatheoretical functions. This has the effect of strictifying all the equations that are involved in the substitution calculus, which greatly reduces the need for transports. As an application, we use our strictified initial CwF to give a short and elegant proof of canonicity for a type theory with dependent products and booleans with large elimination. The resulting proof is fully formalised in Agda.

The notion of equality is at the heart of dependent type theory, as it plays a fundamental role in program specifications and mathematical reasoning. In mainstream proof assistants such as Agda , Lean , and Coq , equality is usually defined using Martin-Löf’s identity type, an elegant and simple approach that has stood the test of time since the 1970s. However, this definition also comes with serious downsides: the intensional nature of Martin-Löf’s identity type means that it is impractical for reasoning about functions and predicates, and it is impossible to define quotient types. Recently, observational equality has garnered attention as an alternative method for encoding equality, particularly in proof assistants supporting definitionally proof-irrelevant propositions. However, it has yet to be integrated in any of the three proof assistants mentioned above, as it is not fully compatible with another important feature of type theory: indexed inductive types. In this article, we propose a systematic approach to reconcile observational equality with indexed inductive types, using a type coercion operator that computes on reflexive identity proofs. The second contribution of this article is a formal proof that this additional computation rule can be integrated to the system without compromising the decidability of conversion. Finally, we provide an implementation of our observational equality in an extension of Coq . This extension is based on the recently introduced rewrite rules and provides new extensionality principles while remaining fully backward-compatible.

We present an extensive mechanization of the metatheory of Martin-Löf Type Theory (MLTT) in the Coq proof assistant. Our development builds on pre-existing work in Agda to show not only the decidability of conversion, but also the decidability of type checking, using an approach guided by bidirectional type checking. From our proof of decidability, we obtain a certified and executable type checker for a full-fledged version of MLTT with support for Π, Σ, ℕ, and Id types, and one universe. Our development does not rely on impredicativity, induction-recursion or any axiom beyond MLTT extended with indexed inductive types and a handful of predicative universes, thus narrowing the gap between the object theory and the metatheory to a mere difference in universes. Furthermore, our formalization choices are geared towards a modular development that relies on Coq's features, e.g. universe polymorphism and metaprogramming with tactics.

Abstract Equality is at the heart of dependent type theory, as it plays a fundamental role in specifications and mathematical reasoning. The standard way to handle it in mainstream proof assistants such as Agda, Lean or Coq is based on Martin-Löf’s identity type, which comes straight out of the ’70s—its elegance and simplicity have earned it a long-standing use, despite a major discrepancy with traditional mathematical formulations: it does not satisfy any extensionality principles. Recently, the work on observational equality has regained interest as a new way to encode equality in proof assistants that support a universe of definitionally proof-irrelevant propositions; however it has yet to be integrated in any major proof assistant, because it is not fully compatible with another important feature of type theory: indexed inductive types. In this paper, we propose a systematic integration of indexed inductive types with an observational equality, and show that this integration can only be completely satisfactory if the observational equality satisfies the computational rule of Martin-Löf’s identity type. The second contribution of this paper is a formal proof that this additional computation rule, although not present in previous works on observational equality, can be integrated to the system without compromising the decidability of conversion.

In dependent type theory, impredicativity is a powerful logical principle that allows the definition of propositions that quantify over arbitrarily large types, potentially resulting in self-referential propositions. Impredicativity can provide a system with increased logical strength and flexibility, but in counterpart it comes with multiple incompatibility results. In particular, Abel and Coquand showed that adding definitional uniqueness of identity proofs (UIP) to the main proof assistants that support impredicative propositions (Coq and Lean) breaks the normalization procedure, and thus the type-checking algorithm. However, it was not known whether this stems from a fundamental incompatibility between UIP and impredicativity or if a more suitable algorithm could decide type-checking for a type theory that supports both. In this paper, we design a theory that handles both UIP and impredicativity by extending the recently introduced observational type theory TTobs with an impredicative universe of definitionally proof-irrelevant types, as initially proposed in the seminal work on observational equality of Altenkirch et al. We prove decidability of conversion for the resulting system, that we call CCobs, by harnessing proof-irrelevance to avoid computing with impredicative proof terms. Additionally, we prove normalization for CCobs in plain Martin-Löf type theory, thereby showing that adding proof-irrelevant impredicativity does not increase the computational content of the theory.

Building on the recent extension of dependent type theory with a universe of definitionally proof-irrelevant types, we introduce TTobs, a new type theory based on the setoidal interpretation of dependent type theory. TTobs equips every type with an identity relation that satisfies function extensionality, propositional extensionality, and definitional uniqueness of identity proofs (UIP). Compared to other existing proposals to enrich dependent type theory with these principles, our theory features a notion of reduction that is normalizing and provides an algorithmic canonicity result, which we formally prove in Agda using the logical relation framework of Abel et al. Our paper thoroughly develops the meta-theoretical properties of TTobs, such as the decidability of the conversion and of the type checking, as well as consistency. We also explain how to extend our theory with quotient types, and we introduce a setoidal version of Swan's Id types that turn it into a proper extension of MLTT with inductive equality.

Homotopy type theory is an extension of type theory that enables synthetic reasoning about spaces and homotopy theory. This has led to elegant computer formalizations of multiple classical results from homotopy theory. However, many proofs are still surprisingly complicated to formalize. One reason for this is the axiomatic treatment of univalence and higher inductive types which complicates synthetic reasoning as many intermediate steps, that could hold simply by computation, require explicit arguments. Cubical type theory offers a solution to this in the form of a new type theory with native support for both univalence and higher inductive types. In this paper we show how the recent cubical extension of Agda can be used to formalize some of the major results of homotopy type theory in a direct and elegant manner.