Sunhyuk Lim

dblp:256/9885 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-2694-3512ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › expressive power
weisfeiler-leman hierarchy
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
gromov-wasserstein distance
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph isomorphism
weisfeiler-leman algorithm
0.612022
Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metric markov chain · 1.1graph kernels · 0.6graph kernel · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Weisfeiler-Lehman Meets Gromov-Wasserstein
abstract
The Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test is a classical procedure for graph isomorphism testing. The WL test has also been widely used both for designing graph kernels and for analyzing graph neural networks. In this paper, we propose the Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) distance, a notion of distance between labeled measure Markov chains (LMMCs), of which labeled graphs are special cases. The WL distance is polynomial time computable and is also compatible with the WL test in the sense that the former is positive if and only if the WL test can distinguish the two involved graphs. The WL distance captures and compares subtle structures of the underlying LMMCs and, as a consequence of this, it is more discriminating than the distance between graphs used for defining the state-of-the-art Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman graph kernel. Inspired by the structure of the WL distance we identify a neural network architecture on LMMCs which turns out to be universal w.r.t. continuous functions defined on the space of all LMMCs (which includes all graphs) endowed with the WL distance. Finally, the WL distance turns out to be stable w.r.t. a natural variant of the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) distance for comparing metric Markov chains that we identify. Hence, the WL distance can also be construed as a polynomial time lower bound for the GW distance which is in general NP-hard to compute.
Samantha Chen 0001, Sunhyuk Lim, Facundo Mémoli, Zhengchao Wan, Yusu Wang 0001
ICML2