Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julien Siems

dblp:257/3075 · also Julien Niklas Siems · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Efficient and distributed learning · 14%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 95% Mathematical optimization · 5%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
linear recurrent neural network
1.722025
DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products · NeurIPS 2025
Unlocking State-Tracking in Linear RNNs Through Negative Eigenvalues · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
1.722025
DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products · NeurIPS 2025
Unlocking State-Tracking in Linear RNNs Through Negative Eigenvalues · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
state tracking
1.722025
DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products · NeurIPS 2025
Unlocking State-Tracking in Linear RNNs Through Negative Eigenvalues · ICLR 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › matching
combinatorial assignment
1.222023
Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial Assignment · AAAI 2023
Monotone-Value Neural Networks: Exploiting Preference Monotonicity in Combinatorial Assignment · IJCAI 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference elicitation
1.222023
Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial Assignment · AAAI 2023
Monotone-Value Neural Networks: Exploiting Preference Monotonicity in Combinatorial Assignment · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search
1.022022
Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS Benchmarks · ICLR 2022
NAS-Bench-1Shot1: Benchmarking and Dissecting One-shot Neural Architecture Search · ICLR 2020
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
1.022022
Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS Benchmarks · ICLR 2022
NAS-Bench-1Shot1: Benchmarking and Dissecting One-shot Neural Architecture Search · ICLR 2020
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › parallel benchmark suites
NAS parallel benchmarks
1.022022
Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS Benchmarks · ICLR 2022
NAS-Bench-1Shot1: Benchmarking and Dissecting One-shot Neural Architecture Search · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.912025
DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
combinatorial auction
0.822023
Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial Assignment · AAAI 2023
Monotone-Value Neural Networks: Exploiting Preference Monotonicity in Combinatorial Assignment · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
additive models
0.712023
Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI › self-interpretable models
generalized additive model
0.712023
Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
one-shot neural architecture search
0.412020
NAS-Bench-1Shot1: Benchmarking and Dissecting One-shot Neural Architecture Search · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling
0.312025
DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance
0.212023
Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization
0.212023
Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial Assignment · AAAI 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › combinatorial auction
winner determination
0.212022
Monotone-Value Neural Networks: Exploiting Preference Monotonicity in Combinatorial Assignment · IJCAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

surrogate modeling · 1.1online gradient descent · 0.9language modeling · 0.9householder transformation · 0.9eigenvalue analysis · 0.9one-shot neural architecture search · 0.9uncertainty estimation · 0.7regularization · 0.7differentiable additive models · 0.7bayesian optimization · 0.7acquisition function · 0.7monotone-value neural networks · 0.6mixed integer linear programming · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unlocking State-Tracking in Linear RNNs Through Negative Eigenvalues
abstract
Linear Recurrent Neural Networks (LRNNs) such as Mamba, RWKV, GLA, mLSTM, and DeltaNet have emerged as efficient alternatives to Transformers for long sequences. However, both Transformers and LRNNs struggle to perform state-tracking, which may impair performance in tasks such as code evaluation. In one forward pass, current architectures are unable to solve even parity, the simplest state-tracking task, which non-linear RNNs can handle effectively. Recently, Sarrof et al. (2024) demonstrated that the failure of LRNNs like Mamba to solve parity stems from restricting the value range of their diagonal state-transition matrices to $[0, 1]$ and that incorporating negative values can resolve this issue. We extend this result to non-diagonal LRNNs such as DeltaNet. We prove that finite precision LRNNs with state-transition matrices having only positive eigenvalues cannot solve parity, while non-triangular matrices are needed to count modulo $3$. Notably, we also prove that LRNNs can learn any regular language when their state-transition matrices are products of identity minus vector outer product matrices, each with eigenvalues in the range $[-1, 1]$. Our experiments confirm that extending the eigenvalue range of Mamba and DeltaNet to include negative values not only enables them to solve parity but consistently improves their performance on state-tracking tasks. We also show that state-tracking enabled LRNNs can be pretrained stably and efficiently at scale (1.3B parameters), achieving competitive performance on language modeling and showing promise on code and math tasks.
Riccardo Grazzi, Julien Siems, Arber Zela, Jörg K. H. Franke, Frank Hutter, Massimiliano Pontil
ICLR2
2025 DeltaProduct: Improving State-Tracking in Linear RNNs via Householder Products
abstract
Linear Recurrent Neural Networks (linear RNNs) have emerged as competitive alternatives to Transformers for sequence modeling, offering efficient training and linear-time inference. However, existing architectures face a fundamental trade-off between expressivity and efficiency, dictated by the structure of their state-transition matrices. Diagonal matrices, used in models such as Mamba, GLA, or mLSTM, yield fast runtime but have limited expressivity. To address this, recent architectures such as DeltaNet and RWKV-7 adopted a diagonal plus rank-1 structure, which allows simultaneous token and channel mixing, improving associative recall and, as recently shown, state-tracking when allowing negative eigenvalues in the state-transition matrices. Building on the interpretation of DeltaNet's recurrence as performing one step of online gradient descent per token on an associative recall loss, we introduce DeltaProduct, which instead takes multiple ($n_h$) steps per token. This naturally leads to diagonal plus rank-$n_h$ state-transition matrices, formed as products of $n_h$ generalized Householder transformations, providing a tunable mechanism to balance expressivity and efficiency. We provide a detailed theoretical characterization of the state-tracking capability of DeltaProduct in finite precision and how it improves by increasing $n_h$. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that DeltaProduct outperforms DeltaNet in both state-tracking and language modeling, while also showing significantly improved length extrapolation capabilities.
Julien Siems, Timur Carstensen, Arber Zela, Frank Hutter, Massimiliano Pontil, Riccardo Grazzi
NeurIPS1
2023 Bayesian Optimization-Based Combinatorial Assignment
abstract
We study the combinatorial assignment domain, which includes combinatorial auctions and course allocation. The main challenge in this domain is that the bundle space grows exponentially in the number of items. To address this, several papers have recently proposed machine learning-based preference elicitation algorithms that aim to elicit only the most important information from agents. However, the main shortcoming of this prior work is that it does not model a mechanism's uncertainty over values for not yet elicited bundles. In this paper, we address this shortcoming by presenting a Bayesian optimization-based combinatorial assignment (BOCA) mechanism. Our key technical contribution is to integrate a method for capturing model uncertainty into an iterative combinatorial auction mechanism. Concretely, we design a new method for estimating an upper uncertainty bound that can be used to define an acquisition function to determine the next query to the agents. This enables the mechanism to properly explore (and not just exploit) the bundle space during its preference elicitation phase. We run computational experiments in several spectrum auction domains to evaluate BOCA's performance. Our results show that BOCA achieves higher allocative efficiency than state-of-the-art approaches.
Jakob Weissteiner, Jakob Heiss, Julien Siems, Sven Seuken
AAAI3
2023 Curve Your Enthusiasm: Concurvity Regularization in Differentiable Generalized Additive Models
abstract
Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) have recently experienced a resurgence in popularity due to their interpretability, which arises from expressing the target value as a sum of non-linear transformations of the features. Despite the current enthusiasm for GAMs, their susceptibility to concurvity — i.e., (possibly non-linear) dependencies between the features — has hitherto been largely overlooked. Here, we demonstrate how concurvity can severly impair the interpretability of GAMs and propose a remedy: a conceptually simple, yet effective regularizer which penalizes pairwise correlations of the non-linearly transformed feature variables. This procedure is applicable to any differentiable additive model, such as Neural Additive Models or NeuralProphet, and enhances interpretability by eliminating ambiguities due to self-canceling feature contributions. We validate the effectiveness of our regularizer in experiments on synthetic as well as real-world datasets for time-series and tabular data. Our experiments show that concurvity in GAMs can be reduced without significantly compromising prediction quality, improving interpretability and reducing variance in the feature importances.
Julien Siems, Konstantin Ditschuneit, Winfried Ripken, Alma Lindborg, Maximilian Schambach, Johannes S. Otterbach, Martin Genzel
NeurIPS1
2022 Surrogate NAS Benchmarks: Going Beyond the Limited Search Spaces of Tabular NAS Benchmarks
Arber Zela, Julien Siems, Lucas Zimmer, Jovita Lukasik, Margret Keuper, Frank Hutter
ICLR2
2022 Monotone-Value Neural Networks: Exploiting Preference Monotonicity in Combinatorial Assignment
abstract
Many important resource allocation problems involve the combinatorial assignment of items, e.g., auctions or course allocation. Because the bundle space grows exponentially in the number of items, preference elicitation is a key challenge in these domains. Recently, researchers have proposed ML-based mechanisms that outperform traditional mechanisms while reducing preference elicitation costs for agents. However, one major shortcoming of the ML algorithms that were used is their disregard of important prior knowledge about agents' preferences. To address this, we introduce monotone-value neural networks (MVNNs), which are designed to capture combinatorial valuations, while enforcing monotonicity and normality. On a technical level, we prove that our MVNNs are universal in the class of monotone and normalized value functions, and we provide a mixed-integer linear program (MILP) formulation to make solving MVNN-based winner determination problems (WDPs) practically feasible. We evaluate our MVNNs experimentally in spectrum auction domains. Our results show that MVNNs improve the prediction performance, they yield state-of-the-art allocative efficiency in the auction, and they also reduce the run-time of the WDPs. Our code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/marketdesignresearch/MVNN.
Jakob Weissteiner, Jakob Heiss, Julien Siems, Sven Seuken
IJCAI3
2020 NAS-Bench-1Shot1: Benchmarking and Dissecting One-shot Neural Architecture Search
Arber Zela, Julien Siems, Frank Hutter
ICLR2