VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Snigdha Panigrahi
dblp:257/5012
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Information extraction and text analysis · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Distributed and cloud data management · 67% Data mining · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
selective inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Inference with Distributed Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Post-Selective Inference for Regression with the Group LASSO · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › debiasing
selection bias mitigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Post-Selective Inference for Regression with the Group LASSO · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Approximate Post-Selective Inference for Regression with the Group LASSO · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Structure Discovery from Distributions Arising from Mixtures of DAGs · ICML 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Structure Discovery from Distributions Arising from Mixtures of DAGs · ICML 2020 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Inference with Distributed Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Causal Structure Discovery from Distributions Arising from Mixtures of DAGs · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subsampling · 2.6generalized linear model · 2.6LASSO · 1.7lasso · 0.9structure learning · 0.9FCI algorithm · 0.9likelihood adjustment factor · 0.7group lasso · 0.7bayesian methods · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Selective Inference with Distributed DataabstractWhen data are distributed across multiple sites or machines rather than centralized in one location, researchers face the challenge of extracting meaningful information without directly sharing individual data points. While there are many distributed methods for point estimation using sparse regression, few options are available for estimating uncertainties or conducting hypothesis tests based on the estimated sparsity. In this paper, we introduce a procedure for performing selective inference with distributed data. We consider a scenario where each local machine solves a lasso problem and communicates the selected predictors to a central machine. The central machine then aggregates these selected predictors to form a generalized linear model (GLM). Our goal is to provide valid inference for the selected GLM while reusing data that have been used in the model selection process. Our proposed procedure only requires low-dimensional summary statistics from local machines, thus keeping communication costs low and preserving the privacy of individual data sets. Furthermore, this procedure can be applied in scenarios where model selection is repeatedly conducted on randomly subsampled data sets, addressing the p-value lottery problem linked with model selection. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach through simulations and an analysis of a medical data set on ICU admissions. Sifan Liu, Snigdha Panigrahi |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2023 | Approximate Post-Selective Inference for Regression with the Group LASSOabstractAfter selection with the Group LASSO (or generalized variants such as the overlapping, sparse, or standardized Group LASSO), inference for the selected parameters is unreliable in the absence of adjustments for selection bias. In the penalized Gaussian regression setup, existing approaches provide adjustments for selection events that can be expressed as linear inequalities in the data variables. Such a representation, however, fails to hold for selection with the Group LASSO and substantially obstructs the scope of subsequent post-selective inference. Key questions of inferential interest, e.g., inference for the effects of selected variables on the outcome, remain unanswered. In the present paper, we develop a consistent, post-selective, Bayesian method to address the existing gaps by deriving a likelihood adjustment factor and an approximation thereof that eliminates bias from the selection of groups. Experiments on simulated data and data from the Human Connectome Project demonstrate that our method recovers the effects of parameters within the selected groups while paying only a small price for bias adjustment. Snigdha Panigrahi, Peter W. MacDonald, Daniel Kessler |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Causal Structure Discovery from Distributions Arising from Mixtures of DAGsabstractWe consider distributions arising from a mixture of causal models, where each model is represented by a directed acyclic graph (DAG). We provide a graphical representation of such mixture distributions and prove that this representation encodes the conditional independence relations of the mixture distribution. We then consider the problem of structure learning based on samples from such distributions. Since the mixing variable is latent, we consider causal structure discovery algorithms such as FCI that can deal with latent variables. We show that such algorithms recover a “union” of the component DAGs and can identify variables whose conditional distribution across the component DAGs vary. We demonstrate our results on synthetic and real data showing that the inferred graph identifies nodes that vary between the different mixture components. As an immediate application, we demonstrate how retrieval of this causal information can be used to cluster samples according to each mixture component. Basil Saeed, Snigdha Panigrahi, Caroline Uhler |
ICML | 2 |