Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jongjin Lee

dblp:257/5173 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.912025
Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.912025
Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
likelihood-based outlier detection
0.812024
ODIM: Outlier Detection via Likelihood of Under-Fitted Generative Models · ICML 2024
Data mining
anomaly detection
0.812024
ODIM: Outlier Detection via Likelihood of Under-Fitted Generative Models · ICML 2024
Data mining › anomaly detection
outlier detection
0.812024
ODIM: Outlier Detection via Likelihood of Under-Fitted Generative Models · ICML 2024
Data mining › anomaly detection › outlier detection
unsupervised outlier detection
0.812024
ODIM: Outlier Detection via Likelihood of Under-Fitted Generative Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks
0.712023
Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior Inference · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior concentration
0.712023
Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior Inference · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

under-fitted deep generative models · 1.5inlier-memorization effect · 1.5gaussian process · 0.9expectation-maximization · 0.9deep latent factor model · 0.9node-sparse prior · 0.7markov chain monte carlo · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model
abstract
Deep ensembles deliver state-of-the-art, reliable uncertainty quantification, but their heavy computational and memory requirements hinder their practical deployments to real applications such as on-device AI. Knowledge distillation compresses an ensemble into small student models, but existing techniques struggle to preserve uncertainty partly because reducing the size of DNNs typically results in variation reduction. To resolve this limitation, we introduce a new method of distribution distillation (i.e. compressing a teacher ensemble into a student distribution instead of a student ensemble) called Gaussian distillation, which estimates the distribution of a teacher ensemble through a special Gaussian process called the deep latent factor model (DLF) by treating each member of the teacher ensemble as a realization of a certain stochastic process. The mean and covariance functions in the DLF model are estimated stably by using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. By using multiple benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that the proposed Gaussian distillation outperforms existing baselines. In addition, we illustrate that Gaussian distillation works well for fine-tuning of language models and distribution shift problems.
Sehyun Park, Jongjin Lee, Yunseop Shin, Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim
NeurIPS2
2024 ODIM: Outlier Detection via Likelihood of Under-Fitted Generative Models
abstract
The unsupervised outlier detection (UOD) problem refers to a task to identify inliers given training data which contain outliers as well as inliers, without any labeled information about inliers and outliers. It has been widely recognized that using fully-trained likelihood-based deep generative models (DGMs) often results in poor performance in distinguishing inliers from outliers. In this study, we claim that the likelihood itself could serve as powerful evidence for identifying inliers in UOD tasks, provided that DGMs are carefully under-fitted. Our approach begins with a novel observation called the inlier-memorization (IM) effect--when training a deep generative model with data including outliers, the model initially memorizes inliers before outliers. Based on this finding, we develop a new method called the outlier detection via the IM effect (ODIM). Remarkably, the ODIM requires only a few updates, making it computationally efficient--at least tens of times faster than other deep-learning-based algorithms. Also, the ODIM filters out outliers excellently, regardless of the data type, including tabular, image, and text data. To validate the superiority and efficiency of our method, we provide extensive empirical analyses on close to 60 datasets.
Jaesung Hwang, Jongjin Lee, Kunwoong Kim, Yongdai Kim
ICML3
2023 Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior Inference
abstract
Bayesian approaches for learning deep neural networks (BNN) have been received much attention and successfully applied to various applications. Particularly, BNNs have the merit of having better generalization ability as well as better uncertainty quantification. For the success of BNN, search an appropriate architecture of the neural networks is an important task, and various algorithms to find good sparse neural networks have been proposed. In this paper, we propose a new node-sparse BNN model which has good theoretical properties and is computationally feasible. We prove that the posterior concentration rate to the true model is near minimax optimal and adaptive to the smoothness of the true model. In particular the adaptiveness is the first of its kind for node-sparse BNNs. In addition, we develop a novel MCMC algorithm which makes the Bayesian inference of the node-sparse BNN model feasible in practice.
Insung Kong, Dongyoon Yang, Jongjin Lee, Ilsang Ohn, Gyuseung Baek, Yongdai Kim
ICML3