Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frank Bagehorn
dblp:257/5634
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Autonomous driving · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 30% Electronic design automation · 30% Cloud and datacenter computing · 21% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.2 | 2 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Electronic design automation › hardware test
fault localization |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Fault Injection Based Interventional Causal Learning for Distributed Applications · AAAI 2023 A fault injection platform for learning AIOps models · ASE 2022 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Fault Injection Based Interventional Causal Learning for Distributed Applications · AAAI 2023 A fault injection platform for learning AIOps models · ASE 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
AI governance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
risk assessment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI Governance · AAAI 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
microservices |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fault Injection Based Interventional Causal Learning for Distributed Applications · AAAI 2023 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A fault injection platform for learning AIOps models · ASE 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
explainable prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error modeling
error propagation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A fault injection platform for learning AIOps models · ASE 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › microservices
microservice applications |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A fault injection platform for learning AIOps models · ASE 2022 |
Data mining › time series analysis › time series forecasting
multivariate time series forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Spatial and temporal data management
time series data management |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural language processing · 0.9human-in-the-loop · 0.9gradient-based saliency · 0.8convolutional neural network · 0.8interventional causal learning · 0.7fault injection · 0.7machine learning · 0.6causal learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Usage Governance Advisor: From Intent to AI GovernanceabstractBringing a new AI system into a production environment involves multiple different stakeholders such as business owners, risk officer, ethics officers approving the AI System for a specific usage. Governance frameworks typically include multiple manual steps, including curating information needed to assess risks and reviewing outcomes to identify appropriate actions and governance strategies. We demo a human-in-the-loop automation system that takes a natural language description of an intended use case for an AI system in order to create semi-structured governance information, recommend the most appropriate model for that use case, prioritise risks to be evaluated, automatically running those evaluations and finally storing these results for auditing, reporting and future recommendations. As a result we increase transparency to stakeholders and provide valuable information to aid in decision making when assessing risks associated with an AI solution. Elizabeth Daly, Seshu Tirupathi, Sean Rooney, Inge Vejsbjerg, Dhaval Salwala, Christopher Giblin, Frank Bagehorn, Luis Garcés-Erice, Peter Urbanetz, Mira L. Wolf-Bauwens |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2024 | SAM: Subseries Augmentation-Based Meta-Learning for Generalizing AIOps Models in Multi-Cloud MigrationabstractIn the context of cloud computing, enterprises are increasingly adopting multi-cloud strategies to enhance performance, ensure cost efficiency, and avoid vendor lock-in. This trend presents a significant challenge for the migration of AI for IT operations (AIOps) models across different cloud providers due to variations in architecture, performance, and data distribution. Traditional methods of re-training AIOps models for new cloud environments are labor-intensive and delay deployment. To address this issue, we introduce a novel framework called SAM (Subseries Augmentation-based Meta-learning), which facilitates seamless model migration between clouds without the need for re-training from scratch. SAM leverages data augmentation and meta-learning to efficiently adapt AIOps models to new cloud environments. It has proven effective in adapting anomaly detectors across various config-urations over both public and simulated datasets. We believe that SAM can also be adapted to other AI models used for automating IT tasks such as alerting and resource scaling. Paulito Palmes, Saurabh Jha, Bekir O. Turkkan, Gerard Vanloo, Frank Bagehorn, Chandrasekhar Narayanaswami 0001, Larisa Shwartz, Naoki Abe, Yu Deng 0004, Daby M. Sow |
CLOUD | 6 |
| 2023 | Fault Injection Based Interventional Causal Learning for Distributed ApplicationsabstractWe apply the machinery of interventional causal learning with programmable interventions to the domain of applications management. Modern applications are modularized into interdependent components or services (e.g. microservices) for ease of development and management. The communication graph among such components is a function of application code and is not always known to the platform provider. In our solution we learn this unknown communication graph solely using application logs observed during the execution of the application by using fault injections in a staging environment. Specifically, we have developed an active (or interventional) causal learning algorithm that uses the observations obtained during fault injections to learn a model of error propagation in the communication among the components. The “power of intervention” additionally allows us to address the presence of confounders in unobserved user interactions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our solution in learning the communication graph of well-known microservice application benchmarks. We also show the efficacy of the solution on a downstream task of fault localization in which the learned graph indeed helps to localize faults at runtime in a production environment (in which the location of the fault is unknown). Additionally, we briefly discuss the implementation and deployment status of a fault injection framework which incorporates the developed technology. Qing Wang 0016, Jesus Rios, Saurabh Jha, Karthikeyan Shanmugam 0001, Frank Bagehorn, Robert Filepp, Naoki Abe, Larisa Shwartz |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2022 | A fault injection platform for learning AIOps modelsabstractIn today’s IT environment with a growing number of costly outages, increasing complexity of the systems, and availability of massive operational data, there is a strengthening demand to effectively leverage Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML) towards enhanced resiliency. In this paper, we present an automatic fault injection platform to enable and optimize the generation of data needed for building AI/ML models to support modern IT operations. The merits of our platform include the ease of use, the possibility to orchestrate complex fault scenarios and to optimize the data generation for the modeling task at hand. Specifically, we designed a fault injection service that (i) combines fault injection with data collection in a unified framework, (ii) supports hybrid and multi-cloud environments, and (iii) does not require programming skills for its use. Our current implementation covers the most common fault types both at the application and infrastructure levels. The platform also includes some AI capabilities. In particular, we demonstrate the interventional causal learning capability currently available in our platform. We show how our system is able to learn a model of error propagation in a micro-service application in a cloud environment (when the communication graph among micro-services is unknown and only logs are available) for use in subsequent applications such as fault localization. Frank Bagehorn, Jesus Rios, Saurabh Jha, Robert Filepp, Larisa Shwartz, Naoki Abe |
ASE | 1 |
| 2019 | MTEX-CNN: Multivariate Time Series EXplanations for Predictions with Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractIn this work we present MTEX-CNN, a novel explainable convolutional neural network architecture which can not only be used for making predictions based on multivariate time series data, but also for explaining these predictions. The network architecture consists of two stages and utilizes particular kernel sizes. This allows us to apply gradient based methods for generating saliency maps for both the time dimension and the features. The first stage of the architecture explains which features are most significant to the predictions, while the second stage explains which time segments are the most significant. We validate our approach on two use cases, namely to predict rare server outages in the wild, as well as the average energy production of photovoltaic power plants based on a benchmark data set. We show that our explanations shed light over what the model has learned. We validate this by retraining the network using the most significant features extracted from the explanations and retaining similar performance to training with the full set of features. Roy Assaf, Ioana Giurgiu, Frank Bagehorn, Anika Schumann |
ICDM | 3 |