Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yameng Gu
dblp:257/5649
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › dynamic graph learning
dynamic node classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adaptive Neural Network for Node Classification in Dynamic Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adaptive Neural Network for Node Classification in Dynamic Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Adaptive Neural Network for Node Classification in Dynamic Networks · ICDM 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random walk · 0.4gated recurrent unit · 0.4attention · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Adaptive Neural Network for Node Classification in Dynamic NetworksabstractGiven a network with the labels for a subset of nodes, transductive node classification targets to predict the labels for the remaining nodes in the network. This technique has been used in a variety of applications such as voxel functionality detection in brain network and group label prediction in social network. Most existing node classification approaches are performed in static networks. However, many real-world networks are dynamic and evolve over time. The dynamics of both node attributes and network topology jointly determine the node labels. In this paper, we study the problem of classifying the nodes in dynamic networks. The task is challenging for three reasons. First, it is hard to effectively learn the spatial and temporal information simultaneously. Second, the network evolution is complex. The evolving patterns lie in both node attributes and network topology. Third, for different networks or even different nodes in the same network, the node attributes, the neighborhood node representations and the network topology usually affect the node labels differently, it is desirable to assess the relative importance of different factors over evolutionary time scales. To address the challenges, we propose AdaNN, an adaptive neural network for transductive node classification. AdaNN learns node attribute information by aggregating the node and its neighbors, and extracts network topology information with a random walk strategy. The attribute information and topology information are further fed into two connected gated recurrent units to learn the spatio-temporal contextual information. Additionally, a triple attention module is designed to automatically model the different factors that influence the node representations. AdaNN is the first node classification model that is adaptive to different kinds of dynamic networks. Extensive experiments on real datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of AdaNN. Dongkuan Xu, Wei Cheng 0002, Yameng Gu, Xiao Liu 0039, Jingchao Ni, Bo Zong, Xiang Zhang 0001 |
ICDM | 4 |