Despite 40 years of active research on congestion control, there has been little or no consideration of how it impacts the energy usage of end-hosts or networking equipment. Particularly with the burgeoning energy consumption of data centers and wide-area networks, we argue that the time is ripe for the networking community to start thinking along these lines. To pave the way, we conduct lab experiments to measure the energy used by popular congestion control algorithms. We consider various aspects of congestion control and the rich research challenges that arise when we consider energy efficiency. Specifically, we find that fairness for the bandwidth allocated by congestion control can increase energy consumption by as high as 16%. We extrapolate these results to projected savings on the order of $10 million/year for large data centers.

Decentralized cellular networks have emerged to increase network accessibility by distributing infrastructure ownership over independent entities. Unlike the centralized setting, these architectures can allow users to connect to any untrusted base station without prior subscription. However, verification of the service is necessary in the absence of trust for commensurate payments by the user. Further, any method of verification must be non-intrusive and reliably agreed upon by the involved parties. To this end, we describe two-sided measurements where both the users and the providers independently assess the cellular service. We find that reconciling measurements from different layers of the cellular stack for a diverse set of matching observations is challenging but not impossible. Hence, new use cases such as a decentralized slicing marketplace, and contract-free roaming can be enabled by two-sided measurements. We envision applying two-sided measurements to real-time, on-demand network slicing and present an architecture that is capable of offering, as well as verifying, such slices in a scalable manner.

The use of the Internet for learning provides a unique and growing opportunity to revisit the task of quantifying how much people have learned about a given subject in different regions around the world. Google alone receives over 5 billion searches a day and its publicly available data provides insight into learning process that is otherwise unobservable on a global scale. In this paper we, introduce the Computer Science Literacy-Proxy Index via Search (CSLI-s), a measure that utilizes online search data to make an educated guess around trends in computer science education. This measure uses a statistical signal processing technique to compose search volumes from a spectrum of topics into a coherent score. We intentionally explore and mitigate the biases of search data and, in the process, develop CSLI-s scores that correlate with traditional, more expensive metrics of learning. We then use search-trend data to measure patterns in subject literacy across countries and over time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first measure of learning via Internet search-trends. The Internet is becoming a standard tool for learners and, as such, we anticipate search-trend data will have growing relevance to the learning science community.