Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avtansh Tiwari

dblp:258/0333 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 70% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 30%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 9%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
clinical decision support
0.812024
Automatic Interpretation of Line Probe Assay Test for Tuberculosis · AAAI 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug response prediction
drug sensitivity prediction
0.812024
Automatic Interpretation of Line Probe Assay Test for Tuberculosis · AAAI 2024
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
tuberculosis diagnosis
0.812024
Automatic Interpretation of Line Probe Assay Test for Tuberculosis · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
one-bit compressed sensing
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Algorithms and data structures
embedding
0.112020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound analysis · 0.9lipschitz continuous generative model · 0.9gaussian measurements · 0.9machine learning · 0.8computer vision · 0.8OCR · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Automatic Interpretation of Line Probe Assay Test for Tuberculosis
abstract
Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a widely used method for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB), but it is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process that requires expert interpretation. DRTB is a significant threat to global TB control efforts and its prompt diagnosis is critical for initiating appropriate treatment. In this paper, we present an automated LPA test interpretation solution that uses computer vision techniques to extract and analyze strips from LPA sheets and uses machine learning algorithms to produce drug sensitivity and resistivity outcomes with extremely high precision and recall. We also develop OCR models to eliminate manual data entry to further reduce the overall time. Our solution comprises a rejection module that flags ambiguous and novel samples that are then referred to experienced lab technicians. This results in increased trust in the solution. To evaluate our solution, we curate an extensive and diverse dataset of LPA strips annotated by multiple microbiologists across India. Our solution achieves more than 95% accuracy for all drugs on this dataset. The proposed solution has the potential to increase the efficiency, standardization of LPA test interpretation, and fast-tracking the dissemination of results to end-users via a designated Management Information System (MIS).
Jatin Agrawal, Mukul Kumar, Avtansh Tiwari, Sachin Danisetty, Soma Dhavala, Nakul Jain, Prasaanth Balraj, Niket Singh, Siddhant Shingi, Jayakrishna Kurada, Raghuram Rao
AAAI3
2020 Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors
abstract
The goal of standard 1-bit compressive sensing is to accurately recover an unknown sparse vector from binary-valued measurements, each indicating the sign of a linear function of the vector. Motivated by recent advances in compressive sensing with generative models, where a generative modeling assumption replaces the usual sparsity assumption, we study the problem of 1-bit compressive sensing with generative models. We first consider noiseless 1-bit measurements, and provide sample complexity bounds for approximate recovery under i.i.d. Gaussian measurements and a Lipschitz continuous generative prior, as well as a near-matching algorithm-independent lower bound. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Binary $\epsilon$-Stable Embedding property, which characterizes the robustness of the reconstruction to measurement errors and noise, also holds for 1-bit compressive sensing with Lipschitz continuous generative models with sufficiently many Gaussian measurements. In addition, we apply our results to neural network generative models, and provide a proof-of-concept numerical experiment demonstrating significant improvements over sparsity-based approaches.
Zhaoqiang Liu, Selwyn Gomes, Avtansh Tiwari, Jonathan Scarlett
ICML3