Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mehmet Aytimur
dblp:258/0719
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1029-0473ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Query processing and optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization
cardinality estimation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | SPACE: Cardinality Estimation for Path Queries Using Cardinality-Aware Sequence-based Learning · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 LPLM: A Neural Language Model for Cardinality Estimation of LIKE-Queries · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Query processing and optimization › cardinality estimation
learned cardinality estimation |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | LPLM: A Neural Language Model for Cardinality Estimation of LIKE-Queries · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 SPACE: Cardinality Estimation for Path Queries Using Cardinality-Aware Sequence-based Learning · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
graph query optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SPACE: Cardinality Estimation for Path Queries Using Cardinality-Aware Sequence-based Learning · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LPLM: A Neural Language Model for Cardinality Estimation of LIKE-Queries · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural language model · 1.5sequence-based learning · 0.9cardinality-aware encoding · 0.9probability distribution functions · 0.8probability distribution function · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SPACE: Cardinality Estimation for Path Queries Using Cardinality-Aware Sequence-based LearningabstractCardinality estimation is a central task of cost-based database query optimization. Accurate estimates enable optimizers to identify and avoid expensive plans requiring large intermediate results. While cardinality estimation has been studied extensively in relational databases, research in the setting of graph databases has been more scarce. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that machine-learning-based methods can be utilized for cardinality estimation in both relational and graph databases. In this paper, we focus on the problem of estimating the cardinality of path patterns in graph databases, and we propose the Sequence-based Path Pattern Cardinality Estimator (SPACE). Our approach treats path patterns as sequences of node labels and edge types and assign similar cardinalities to path patterns with similar node and edge order. SPACE uses a dual approach: it encodes the sequence of nodes and edges to capture structural characteristics of the path pattern, while also incorporating a cardinality-based encoding to integrate cardinality information throughout learning. In a comprehensive experimental evaluation, we show that our method outperforms the state of the art in terms of both accuracy ( Q -error) and training time. Mehmet Aytimur, Theodoros Chondrogiannis, Michael Grossniklaus |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 1 |
| 2024 | LPLM: A Neural Language Model for Cardinality Estimation of LIKE-QueriesabstractCardinality estimation is an important step in cost-based database query optimization. The accuracy of the estimates directly affects the ability of an optimizer to identify the most efficient query execution plan correctly. In this paper, we study cardinality estimation of LIKE-queries, i.e., queries that use the LIKE-operator to match a pattern with wildcards against string-valued attributes. While both traditional and machine-learning-based approaches have been proposed to tackle this problem, we argue that they all suffer from drawbacks. Most importantly, many state-of-the-art approaches are not designed for patterns that contain wildcards in-between characters. Based on past research on neural language models, we introduce the LIKE-Pattern Language Model (LPLM) that uses a new language and a novel probability distribution function to capture the semantics of general LIKE-patterns. We also propose a method to generate training data for our model. We demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of precision (Q-error), while offering comparable runtime performance and memory requirements. Mehmet Aytimur, Silvan Reiner, Leonard Wörteler, Theodoros Chondrogiannis, Michael Grossniklaus |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 1 |
| 2021 | Using positional sequence patterns to estimate the selectivity of SQL LIKE queries
Mehmet Aytimur, Ali Cakmak 0001 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |