Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabricio Arend Torres

dblp:258/1054 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Generative modeling · 31% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
gaussian graphical model
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › gaussian graphical model
sparse precision matrix estimation
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.712023
Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › matrix factorization
archetypal analysis
0.512021
Learning Extremal Representations with Deep Archetypal Analysis · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
latent representation learning
0.512021
Learning Extremal Representations with Deep Archetypal Analysis · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › information bottleneck
variational information bottleneck
0.112021
Learning Extremal Representations with Deep Archetypal Analysis · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffeomorphism · 1.5continuity equation · 1.5simulated annealing · 0.7matrix-variate normalizing flow · 0.7MAP estimation · 0.7variational autoencoder · 0.5information bottleneck · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws
abstract
We introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time. By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation, a PDE describing mass conservation in its differential form. Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps. This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields. Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time. The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density. Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE. LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D, while being computationally efficient. As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements.
Fabricio Arend Torres, Marcello Massimo Negri, Marco Inversi, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001
ICLR1
2023 Conditional Matrix Flows for Gaussian Graphical Models
abstract
Studying conditional independence among many variables with few observations is a challenging task. Gaussian Graphical Models (GGMs) tackle this problem by encouraging sparsity in the precision matrix through $l_q$ regularization with $q\leq1$. However, most GMMs rely on the $l_1$ norm because the objective is highly non-convex for sub-$l_1$ pseudo-norms. In the frequentist formulation, the $l_1$ norm relaxation provides the solution path as a function of the shrinkage parameter $\lambda$. In the Bayesian formulation, sparsity is instead encouraged through a Laplace prior, but posterior inference for different $\lambda$ requires repeated runs of expensive Gibbs samplers. Here we propose a general framework for variational inference with matrix-variate Normalizing Flow in GGMs, which unifies the benefits of frequentist and Bayesian frameworks. As a key improvement on previous work, we train with one flow a continuum of sparse regression models jointly for all regularization parameters $\lambda$ and all $l_q$ norms, including non-convex sub-$l_1$ pseudo-norms. Within one model we thus have access to (i) the evolution of the posterior for any $\lambda$ and any $l_q$ (pseudo-) norm, (ii) the marginal log-likelihood for model selection, and (iii) the frequentist solution paths through simulated annealing in the MAP limit.
Marcello Massimo Negri, Fabricio Arend Torres, Volker Roth 0001
NeurIPS2
2021 Learning Extremal Representations with Deep Archetypal Analysis
abstract
Abstract Archetypes represent extreme manifestations of a population with respect to specific characteristic traits or features. In linear feature space, archetypes approximate the data convex hull allowing all data points to be expressed as convex mixtures of archetypes. As mixing of archetypes is performed directly on the input data, linear Archetypal Analysis requires additivity of the input, which is a strong assumption unlikely to hold e.g. in case of image data. To address this problem, we propose learning an appropriate latent feature space while simultaneously identifying suitable archetypes. We thus introduce a generative formulation of the linear archetype model, parameterized by neural networks. By introducing the distance-dependent archetype loss, the linear archetype model can be integrated into the latent space of a deep variational information bottleneck and an optimal representation, together with the archetypes, can be learned end-to-end. Moreover, the information bottleneck framework allows for a natural incorporation of arbitrarily complex side information during training. As a consequence, learned archetypes become easily interpretable as they derive their meaning directly from the included side information. Applicability of the proposed method is demonstrated by exploring archetypes of female facial expressions while using multi-rater based emotion scores of these expressions as side information. A second application illustrates the exploration of the chemical space of small organic molecules. By using different kinds of side information we demonstrate how identified archetypes, along with their interpretation, largely depend on the side information provided.
Sebastian Keller 0001, Maxim Samarin, Fabricio Arend Torres, Mario Wieser, Volker Roth 0001
Int. J. Comput. Vis.3