Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Graham D. Johnson

dblp:258/2419 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.412020
Bayesian estimation of genetic regulatory effects in high-throughput reporter assays · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory variant interpretation
regulatory variant effect prediction
0.412020
Bayesian estimation of genetic regulatory effects in high-throughput reporter assays · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › variant annotation
non-coding variant functional annotation
0.112020
Bayesian estimation of genetic regulatory effects in high-throughput reporter assays · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

poisson-binomial distribution · 0.4bayesian hierarchical model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Bayesian estimation of genetic regulatory effects in high-throughput reporter assays
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput reporter assays dramatically improve our ability to assign function to noncoding genetic variants, by measuring allelic effects on gene expression in the controlled setting of a reporter gene. Unlike genetic association tests, such assays are not confounded by linkage disequilibrium when loci are independently assayed. These methods can thus improve the identification of causal disease mutations. While work continues on improving experimental aspects of these assays, less effort has gone into developing methods for assessing the statistical significance of assay results, particularly in the case of rare variants captured from patient DNA. RESULTS: We describe a Bayesian hierarchical model, called Bayesian Inference of Regulatory Differences, which integrates prior information and explicitly accounts for variability between experimental replicates. The model produces substantially more accurate predictions than existing methods when allele frequencies are low, which is of clear advantage in the search for disease-causing variants in DNA captured from patient cohorts. Using the model, we demonstrate a clear tradeoff between variant sequencing coverage and numbers of biological replicates, and we show that the use of additional biological replicates decreases variance in estimates of effect size, due to the properties of the Poisson-binomial distribution. We also provide a power and sample size calculator, which facilitates decision making in experimental design parameters. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is freely available from www.geneprediction.org/bird. The experimental design web tool can be accessed at http://67.159.92.22:8080. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
William H. Majoros, Young-Sook Kim, Alejandro Barrera, Fan Li 0021, Xingyan Wang, Sarah J. Cunningham, Graham D. Johnson, William L. Lowe, Denise M. Scholtens, M. Geoffrey Hayes, Timothy E. Reddy, Andrew S. Allen
Bioinform.7