VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Isaac Robinson
dblp:258/5013
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3340-3255ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Roboflow100-VL: A Multi-Domain Object Detection Benchmark for Vision-Language ModelsabstractVision-language models (VLMs) trained on internet-scale data achieve remarkable zero-shot detection performance on common objects like car, truck, and pedestrian. However, state-of-the-art models still struggle to generalize to out-of-distribution classes, tasks and imaging modalities not typically found in their pre-training. Rather than simply re-training VLMs on more visual data, we argue that one should align VLMs to new concepts with annotation instructions containing a few visual examples and rich textual descriptions. To this end, we introduce Roboflow100-VL, a large-scale collection of 100 multi-modal object detection datasets with diverse concepts not commonly found in VLM pre-training. We evaluate state-of-the-art models on our benchmark in zero-shot, few-shot, semi-supervised, and fully-supervised settings, allowing for comparison across data regimes. Notably, we find that VLMs like GroundingDINO and Qwen2.5-VL achieve less than 2% zero-shot accuracy on challenging medical imaging datasets within Roboflow100-VL, demonstrating the need for few-shot concept alignment. Lastly, we discuss our recent CVPR 2025 Foundational FSOD competition and share insights from the community. Notably, the winning team significantly outperforms our baseline by 17 mAP! Our code and dataset are available on GitHub and Roboflow. Matvei Popov, Peter Robicheaux, Anish Madan, Isaac Robinson, Joseph Nelson, Deva Ramanan, Neehar Peri |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2025 | From Independence of Clones to Composition Consistency: A Hierarchy of Barriers to Strategic NominationabstractWe study two axioms for social choice functions that capture the impact of similar candidates: independence of clones (IoC) and composition consistency (CC). We clarify the relationship between these axioms by observing that CC is strictly more demanding than IoC, and investigate whether common voting rules that are known to be independent of clones (such as Single Transferable Vote, Ranked Pairs, Schulze Method, and Split Cycle) are composition-consistent. While for most of these rules the answer is negative, we identify a variant of Ranked Pairs that satisfies CC. Further, we show how to efficiently modify any (neutral) social choice function so that it satisfies CC, while maintaining its other desirable properties. Our transformation relies on the hierarchical representation of clone structures via PQ-trees. We extend our analysis to social preference functions. Finally, we interpret IoC and CC as measures of robustness against strategic manipulation by candidates, with IoC corresponding to strategy-proofness and CC corresponding to obvious strategy-proofness. Ratip Emin Berker, Sílvia Casacuberta, Isaac Robinson, Christopher Ong, Vincent Conitzer, Edith Elkind |
EC | 3 |
| 2024 | School Redistricting: Wiping Unfairness Off the MapabstractWe introduce and study the problem of designing an equitable school redistricting map, which we formalize as that of assigning n students to school attendance zones in a way that is fair to various demographic groups. Drawing on methodology from fair division, we consider the demographic groups as players and seats in schools as homogeneous goods. Due to geographic constraints, not every school can be assigned to every student. This raises new obstacles, rendering some classic fairness criteria infeasible. Nevertheless, we show that it is always possible to find an almost proportional allocation among g demographic groups if we are allowed to add O(g log g) extra seats. For any fixed g, we show that such an allocation can be found in polynomial time, obtaining a runtime of O(n2 log n) in the special (but practical) case where g ≤ 3. Ariel D. Procaccia, Isaac Robinson, Jamie Tucker-Foltz |
SODA | 2 |