VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas M. Sutter
dblp:259/0609
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7503-4473ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 39% Representation and self-supervised learning · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
2.3 | 4 | 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 On the Limitations of Multimodal VAEs · ICLR 2022 Generalized Multimodal ELBO · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
multimodal variational autoencoder |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 On the Limitations of Multimodal VAEs · ICLR 2022 Generalized Multimodal ELBO · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 On the Limitations of Multimodal VAEs · ICLR 2022 Generalized Multimodal ELBO · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Differentiable Random Partition Models · NeurIPS 2023 Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
shared latent representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › gradient computation
differentiable relaxation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Group Importance using the Differentiable Hypergeometric Distribution · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
random partition model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentiable Random Partition Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
reparameterization gradient |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentiable Random Partition Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › multimodal generation
multimodal generative model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multimodal Generative Learning Utilizing Jensen-Shannon-Divergence · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Differentiable Random Partition Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Differentiable Random Partition Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.3stochastic gradient optimization · 1.3reparameterization trick · 1.3soft constraints · 0.8mixture of experts · 0.8differentiable hypergeometric distribution · 0.7evidence lower bound · 0.5variational autoencoder · 0.4jensen-shannon divergence · 0.4ELBO · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Reducing diverse sources of noise in ventricular electrical signals using variational autoencodersabstractReducing electrophysiological (EP) signal noise is essential for diagnosis, mapping, and ablation procedures in patients with arrhythmias or conditions such as cardiomyopathies. However, traditional approaches have been suboptimal due to the varied sources of noise. We hypothesized that variational autoencoders (VAEs) can learn key components of ’clean’ electrophysiological signals by creating robust internal representations, thereby enabling automatic denoising of diverse noise in clinical recordings. We set out to apply a β -VAE model to a dataset of 5706 intra-ventricular monophasic action potential (MAP) signals, selected because their morphology is verifiable and measurable against a reference, from 42 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy at risk for sudden death. We designed a noise library, and implemented baselines based on state-of-the-art clinical filtering techniques. The proposed β -VAE model was assessed for various noise types, including challenging non-stationary real EP noise. Comprehensive evaluation using general metrics and clinical action potential duration labels by domain experts revealed that our β -VAE outperformed current state-of-the-art filters in denoising efficacy, with key physiological information encoded in the reconstruction. We performed a sensitivity analysis that confirmed the robustness of the β -VAE model to increasing noise levels. These results demonstrate the ability of our model to denoise various sources, including those of time-varying nature. The application to well-studied MAPs verifies that clinically meaningful features were reconstructed in the EP context. This work enhances traditional signal processing approaches to ensure ’clean’ electrical signals, and may have promising applications for diagnosis, tracking therapy and prognostication in patients with EP disorders in real-world clinical environments. Samuel Ruipérez-Campillo, Alain Ryser, Thomas M. Sutter, Brototo Deb, Ruibin Feng, Prasanth Ganesan, Kelly A. Brennan, Albert J. Rogers, Maarten Z. Kolk, Fleur V. Y. Tjong, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Julia E. Vogt |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 3 |
| 2024 | Unity by Diversity: Improved Representation Learning for Multimodal VAEsabstractVariational Autoencoders for multimodal data hold promise for many tasks in data analysis, such as representation learning, conditional generation, and imputation.
Current architectures either share the encoder output, decoder input, or both across modalities to learn a shared representation.
Such architectures impose hard constraints on the model.
In this work, we show that a better latent representation can be obtained by replacing these hard constraints with a soft constraint. We propose a new mixture-of-experts prior, softly guiding each modality's latent representation towards a shared aggregate posterior.
This approach results in a superior latent representation and allows each encoding to preserve information better from its uncompressed original features. In extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets and two challenging real-world datasets, we show improved learned latent representations and imputation of missing data modalities compared to existing methods. Thomas M. Sutter, Andrea Agostini, Daphné Chopard, Norbert Fortin, Julia E. Vogt, Babak Shahbaba, Stephan Mandt |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Learning Group Importance using the Differentiable Hypergeometric Distribution
Thomas M. Sutter, Laura Manduchi, Alain Ryser, Julia E. Vogt |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Differentiable Random Partition ModelsabstractPartitioning a set of elements into an unknown number of mutually exclusive subsets is essential in many machine learning problems.
However, assigning elements, such as samples in a dataset or neurons in a network layer, to an unknown and discrete number of subsets is inherently non-differentiable, prohibiting end-to-end gradient-based optimization of parameters.
We overcome this limitation by proposing a novel two-step method for inferring partitions, which allows its usage in variational inference tasks.
This new approach enables reparameterized gradients with respect to the parameters of the new random partition model.
Our method works by inferring the number of elements per subset and, second, by filling these subsets in a learned order.
We highlight the versatility of our general-purpose approach on three different challenging experiments: variational clustering, inference of shared and independent generative factors under weak supervision, and multitask learning. Thomas M. Sutter, Alain Ryser, Joram Liebeskind, Julia E. Vogt |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | On the Limitations of Multimodal VAEs
Imant Daunhawer, Thomas M. Sutter, Kieran Chin-Cheong, Emanuele Palumbo, Julia E. Vogt |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Generalized Multimodal ELBO
Thomas M. Sutter, Imant Daunhawer, Julia E. Vogt |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | A comparison of general and disease-specific machine learning models for the prediction of unplanned hospital readmissionsabstractUnplanned hospital readmissions are a burden to patients and increase healthcare costs. A wide variety of machine learning (ML) models have been suggested to predict unplanned hospital readmissions. These ML models were often specifically trained on patient populations with certain diseases. However, it is unclear whether these specialized ML models-trained on patient subpopulations with certain diseases or defined by other clinical characteristics-are more accurate than a general ML model trained on an unrestricted hospital cohort. In this study based on an electronic health record cohort of consecutive inpatient cases of a single tertiary care center, we demonstrate that accurate prediction of hospital readmissions may be obtained by general, disease-independent, ML models. This general approach may substantially decrease the cost of development and deployment of respective ML models in daily clinical routine, as all predictions are obtained by the use of a single model. Thomas M. Sutter, Jan A. Roth, Kieran Chin-Cheong, Balthasar L. Hug, Julia E. Vogt |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 1 |
| 2020 | Multimodal Generative Learning Utilizing Jensen-Shannon-DivergenceabstractLearning from different data types is a long-standing goal in machine learning research, as multiple information sources co-occur when describing natural phenomena. However, existing generative models that approximate a multimodal ELBO rely on difficult or inefficient training schemes to learn a joint distribution and the dependencies between modalities. In this work, we propose a novel, efficient objective function that utilizes the Jensen-Shannon divergence for multiple distributions. It simultaneously approximates the unimodal and joint multimodal posteriors directly via a dynamic prior. In addition, we theoretically prove that the new multimodal JS-divergence (mmJSD) objective optimizes an ELBO. In extensive experiments, we demonstrate the advantage of the proposed mmJSD model compared to previous work in unsupervised, generative learning tasks. Thomas M. Sutter, Imant Daunhawer, Julia E. Vogt |
NeurIPS | 1 |