Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Quentin Klopfenstein
dblp:259/3002
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5771-6013ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 76% Deep learning architectures and training · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Implicit Differentiation for Fast Hyperparameter Selection in Non-Smooth Convex Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Implicit differentiation of Lasso-type models for hyperparameter optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Implicit Differentiation for Fast Hyperparameter Selection in Non-Smooth Convex Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Implicit differentiation of Lasso-type models for hyperparameter optimization · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit differentiation |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Implicit Differentiation for Fast Hyperparameter Selection in Non-Smooth Convex Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 Implicit differentiation of Lasso-type models for hyperparameter optimization · ICML 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | skglm: Improving scikit-learn for Regularized Generalized Linear Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
generalized linear models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | skglm: Improving scikit-learn for Regularized Generalized Linear Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
regularized regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | skglm: Improving scikit-learn for Regularized Generalized Linear Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
coordinate descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Beyond L1: Faster and Better Sparse Models with skglm · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Beyond L1: Faster and Better Sparse Models with skglm · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
reproducible benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coordinate descent · 1.4reproducibility · 1.1benchmarking automation · 1.1implicit differentiation · 1.0proximal methods · 0.9working set · 0.6proximal gradient descent · 0.6proximal coordinate descent · 0.6anderson acceleration · 0.6lasso regularization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | skglm: Improving scikit-learn for Regularized Generalized Linear ModelsabstractWe introduce skglm, an open-source Python package for regularized Generalized Linear Models. Thanks to its composable nature, it supports combining datafits, penalties, and solvers to fit a wide range of models, many of them not included in scikit-learn (e.g. Group Lasso and variants). It uses state-of-the-art algorithms to solve problems involving high-dimensional datasets, providing large speed-ups compared to existing implementations. It is fully compliant with the scikit-learn API and acts as a drop-in replacement for its estimators. Finally, it abides by the standards of open source development and is integrated in the scikit-learn-contrib GitHub organization. Badr Moufad, Pierre-Antoine Bannier, Quentin Bertrand, Quentin Klopfenstein, Mathurin Massias |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2023 | Coordinate Descent for SLOPEabstractThe lasso is the most famous sparse regression and feature selection method. One reason for its popularity is the speed at which the underlying optimization problem can be solved. Sorted L-One Penalized Estimation (SLOPE) is a generalization of the lasso with appealing statistical properties. In spite of this, the method has not yet reached widespread interest. A major reason for this is that current software packages that fit SLOPE rely on algorithms that perform poorly in high dimensions. To tackle this issue, we propose a new fast algorithm to solve the SLOPE optimization problem, which combines proximal gradient descent and proximal coordinate descent steps. We provide new results on the directional derivative of the SLOPE penalty and its related SLOPE thresholding operator, as well as provide convergence guarantees for our proposed solver. In extensive benchmarks on simulated and real data, we demonstrate our method’s performance against a long list of competing algorithms. Johan Larsson 0002, Quentin Klopfenstein, Mathurin Massias, Jonas Wallin |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2022 | Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarksabstractNumerical validation is at the core of machine learning research as it allows us to assess the actual impact of new methods, and to confirm the agreement between theory and practice. Yet, the rapid development of the field poses several challenges: researchers are confronted with a profusion of methods to compare, limited transparency and consensus on best practices, as well as tedious re-implementation work. As a result, validation is often very partial, which can lead to wrong conclusions that slow down the progress of research. We propose Benchopt, a collaborative framework to automatize, publish and reproduce optimization benchmarks in machine learning across programming languages and hardware architectures. Benchopt simplifies benchmarking for the community by providing an off-the-shelf tool for running, sharing and extending experiments. To demonstrate its broad usability, we showcase benchmarks on three standard ML tasks: $\ell_2$-regularized logistic regression, Lasso and ResNet18 training for image classification. These benchmarks highlight key practical findings that give a more nuanced view of state-of-the-art for these problems, showing that for practical evaluation, the devil is in the details. Thomas Moreau 0001, Mathurin Massias, Alexandre Gramfort, Pierre Ablin, Pierre-Antoine Bannier, Benjamin Charlier, Mathieu Dagréou, Tom Dupré la Tour, Ghislain Durif, Cássio Fraga Dantas, Quentin Klopfenstein, Johan Larsson 0002, En Lai, Tanguy Lefort, Benoît Malézieux, Badr Moufad, Alain Rakotomamonjy, Zaccharie Ramzi, Joseph Salmon, Samuel Vaiter |
NeurIPS | 11 |
| 2022 | Beyond L1: Faster and Better Sparse Models with skglmabstractWe propose a new fast algorithm to estimate any sparse generalized linear model with convex or non-convex separable penalties. Our algorithm is able to solve problems with millions of samples and features in seconds, by relying on coordinate descent, working sets and Anderson acceleration. It handles previously unaddressed models, and is extensively shown to improve state-of-art algorithms. We provide a flexible, scikit-learn compatible package, which easily handles customized datafits and penalties. Quentin Bertrand, Quentin Klopfenstein, Pierre-Antoine Bannier, Gauthier Gidel, Mathurin Massias |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Implicit Differentiation for Fast Hyperparameter Selection in Non-Smooth Convex LearningabstractFinding the optimal hyperparameters of a model can be cast as a bilevel optimization problem, typically solved using zero-order techniques. In this work we study first-order methods when the inner optimization problem is convex but non-smooth. We show that the forward-mode differentiation of proximal gradient descent and proximal coordinate descent yield sequences of Jacobians converging toward the exact Jacobian. Using implicit differentiation, we show it is possible to leverage the non-smoothness of the inner problem to speed up the computation. Finally, we provide a bound on the error made on the hypergradient when the inner optimization problem is solved approximately. Results on regression and classification problems reveal computational benefits for hyperparameter optimization, especially when multiple hyperparameters are required. Quentin Bertrand, Quentin Klopfenstein, Mathurin Massias, Mathieu Blondel, Samuel Vaiter, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2021 | Linear support vector regression with linear constraints
Quentin Klopfenstein, Samuel Vaiter |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2020 | Implicit differentiation of Lasso-type models for hyperparameter optimizationabstractSetting regularization parameters for Lasso-type estimators is notoriously difficult, though crucial for obtaining the best accuracy. The most popular hyperparameter optimization approach is grid-search on a held-out dataset. However, grid-search requires to choose a predefined grid of parameters and scales exponentially in the number of parameters. Another class of approaches casts hyperparameter optimization as a bi-level optimization problem, typically solved by gradient descent. The key challenge for these approaches is the estimation of the gradient w.r.t. the hyperparameters. Computing that gradient via forward or backward automatic differentiation usually suffers from high memory consumption, while implicit differentiation typically involves solving a linear system which can be prohibitive and numerically unstable. In addition, implicit differentiation usually assumes smooth loss functions, which is not the case of Lasso-type problems. This work introduces an efficient implicit differentiation algorithm, without matrix inversion, tailored for Lasso-type problems. Our proposal scales to high-dimensional data by leveraging the sparsity of the solutions. Empirically, we demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms a large number of standard methods for hyperparameter optimization. Quentin Bertrand, Quentin Klopfenstein, Mathieu Blondel, Samuel Vaiter, Alexandre Gramfort, Joseph Salmon |
ICML | 2 |