VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander Rogozin
dblp:259/3142
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 75% Computational complexity · 16% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025 Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › approximation classes › optimization complexity
lower complexity bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021 |
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
robust regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lower complexity bounds · 1.3convex optimization · 1.3accelerated consensus · 1.3lower bound analysis · 1.0gossip averaging · 1.0nesterov acceleration · 0.5fenchel conjugate · 0.5dual oracle · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Decentralized Optimization with Coupled ConstraintsabstractWe consider the decentralized minimization of a separable objective $\sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i(x_i)$, where the variables are coupled through an affine constraint $\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\mathbf{A}_i x_i - b_i\right) = 0$.
We assume that the functions $f_i$, matrices $\mathbf{A}_i$, and vectors $b_i$ are stored locally by the nodes of a computational network, and that the functions $f_i$ are smooth and strongly convex.
This problem has significant applications in resource allocation and systems control and can also arise in distributed machine learning.
We propose lower complexity bounds for decentralized optimization problems with coupled constraints and a first-order algorithm achieving the lower bounds. To the best of our knowledge, our method is also the first linearly convergent first-order decentralized algorithm for problems with general affine coupled constraints. Demyan Yarmoshik, Alexander Rogozin, Nikita Kiselev, Daniil Dorin, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Dmitry Kovalev |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks?abstractWe consider decentralized optimization problems where one aims to minimize a sum of convex smooth objective functions distributed between nodes in the network. The links in the network can change from time to time. For the setting when the amount of changes is arbitrary, lower complexity bounds and corresponding optimal algorithms are known, and the consensus acceleration is not possible. However, in practice the magnitude of network changes may be limited. We derive lower complexity bounds for several regimes of velocity of networks changes. Moreover, we show how to obtain accelerated communication rates for a certain class of time-varying graphs using a specific consensus algorithm. Dmitry Metelev, Alexander Rogozin, Dmitry Kovalev, Alexander V. Gasnikov |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying NetworksabstractWe propose ADOM – an accelerated method for smooth and strongly convex decentralized optimization over time-varying networks. ADOM uses a dual oracle, i.e., we assume access to the gradient of the Fenchel conjugate of the individual loss functions. Up to a constant factor, which depends on the network structure only, its communication complexity is the same as that of accelerated Nesterov gradient method. To the best of our knowledge, only the algorithm of Rogozin et al. (2019) has a convergence rate with similar properties. However, their algorithm converges under the very restrictive assumption that the number of network changes can not be greater than a tiny percentage of the number of iterations. This assumption is hard to satisfy in practice, as the network topology changes usually can not be controlled. In contrast, ADOM merely requires the network to stay connected throughout time. Dmitry Kovalev, Egor Shulgin, Peter Richtárik, Alexander Rogozin, Alexander V. Gasnikov |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data SimilarityabstractWe study solution methods for (strongly-)convex-(strongly)-concave Saddle-Point Problems (SPPs) over networks of two type--master/workers (thus centralized) architectures and mesh (thus decentralized) networks. The local functions at each node are assumed to be \textit{similar}, due to statistical data similarity or otherwise. We establish lower complexity bounds for a fairly general class of algorithms solving the SPP. We show that a given suboptimality $\epsilon>0$ is achieved over master/workers networks in $\Omega\big(\Delta\cdot \delta/\mu\cdot \log (1/\varepsilon)\big)$ rounds of communications, where $\delta>0$ measures the degree of similarity of the local functions, $\mu$ is their strong convexity constant, and $\Delta$ is the diameter of the network. The lower communication complexity bound over mesh networks reads $\Omega\big(1/{\sqrt{\rho}} \cdot {\delta}/{\mu}\cdot\log (1/\varepsilon)\big)$, where $\rho$ is the (normalized) eigengap of the gossip matrix used for the communication between neighbouring nodes. We then propose algorithms matching the lower bounds over either types of networks (up to log-factors). We assess the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on a robust regression problem. Aleksandr Beznosikov, Gesualdo Scutari, Alexander Rogozin, Alexander V. Gasnikov |
NeurIPS | 3 |