Alexander Rogozin

dblp:259/3142 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 75% Computational complexity · 16% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization
1.522025
Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025
Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods
0.912025
Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025
Computational complexity › complexity classes › approximation classes › optimization complexity
lower complexity bounds
0.912025
Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization
0.512021
Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.512021
ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization
0.512021
ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization
0.512021
Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph
0.512021
ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks · ICML 2021
Distributed systems
consensus
0.212023
Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.212023
Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks? · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression
robust regression
0.112021
Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower complexity bounds · 1.3convex optimization · 1.3accelerated consensus · 1.3lower bound analysis · 1.0gossip averaging · 1.0nesterov acceleration · 0.5fenchel conjugate · 0.5dual oracle · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Decentralized Optimization with Coupled Constraints
abstract
We consider the decentralized minimization of a separable objective $\sum_{i=1}^{n} f_i(x_i)$, where the variables are coupled through an affine constraint $\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\mathbf{A}_i x_i - b_i\right) = 0$. We assume that the functions $f_i$, matrices $\mathbf{A}_i$, and vectors $b_i$ are stored locally by the nodes of a computational network, and that the functions $f_i$ are smooth and strongly convex. This problem has significant applications in resource allocation and systems control and can also arise in distributed machine learning. We propose lower complexity bounds for decentralized optimization problems with coupled constraints and a first-order algorithm achieving the lower bounds. To the best of our knowledge, our method is also the first linearly convergent first-order decentralized algorithm for problems with general affine coupled constraints.
Demyan Yarmoshik, Alexander Rogozin, Nikita Kiselev, Daniil Dorin, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Dmitry Kovalev
ICLR2
2023 Is Consensus Acceleration Possible in Decentralized Optimization over Slowly Time-Varying Networks?
abstract
We consider decentralized optimization problems where one aims to minimize a sum of convex smooth objective functions distributed between nodes in the network. The links in the network can change from time to time. For the setting when the amount of changes is arbitrary, lower complexity bounds and corresponding optimal algorithms are known, and the consensus acceleration is not possible. However, in practice the magnitude of network changes may be limited. We derive lower complexity bounds for several regimes of velocity of networks changes. Moreover, we show how to obtain accelerated communication rates for a certain class of time-varying graphs using a specific consensus algorithm.
Dmitry Metelev, Alexander Rogozin, Dmitry Kovalev, Alexander V. Gasnikov
ICML2
2021 ADOM: Accelerated Decentralized Optimization Method for Time-Varying Networks
abstract
We propose ADOM – an accelerated method for smooth and strongly convex decentralized optimization over time-varying networks. ADOM uses a dual oracle, i.e., we assume access to the gradient of the Fenchel conjugate of the individual loss functions. Up to a constant factor, which depends on the network structure only, its communication complexity is the same as that of accelerated Nesterov gradient method. To the best of our knowledge, only the algorithm of Rogozin et al. (2019) has a convergence rate with similar properties. However, their algorithm converges under the very restrictive assumption that the number of network changes can not be greater than a tiny percentage of the number of iterations. This assumption is hard to satisfy in practice, as the network topology changes usually can not be controlled. In contrast, ADOM merely requires the network to stay connected throughout time.
Dmitry Kovalev, Egor Shulgin, Peter Richtárik, Alexander Rogozin, Alexander V. Gasnikov
ICML4
2021 Distributed Saddle-Point Problems Under Data Similarity
abstract
We study solution methods for (strongly-)convex-(strongly)-concave Saddle-Point Problems (SPPs) over networks of two type--master/workers (thus centralized) architectures and mesh (thus decentralized) networks. The local functions at each node are assumed to be \textit{similar}, due to statistical data similarity or otherwise. We establish lower complexity bounds for a fairly general class of algorithms solving the SPP. We show that a given suboptimality $\epsilon>0$ is achieved over master/workers networks in $\Omega\big(\Delta\cdot \delta/\mu\cdot \log (1/\varepsilon)\big)$ rounds of communications, where $\delta>0$ measures the degree of similarity of the local functions, $\mu$ is their strong convexity constant, and $\Delta$ is the diameter of the network. The lower communication complexity bound over mesh networks reads $\Omega\big(1/{\sqrt{\rho}} \cdot {\delta}/{\mu}\cdot\log (1/\varepsilon)\big)$, where $\rho$ is the (normalized) eigengap of the gossip matrix used for the communication between neighbouring nodes. We then propose algorithms matching the lower bounds over either types of networks (up to log-factors). We assess the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms on a robust regression problem.
Aleksandr Beznosikov, Gesualdo Scutari, Alexander Rogozin, Alexander V. Gasnikov
NeurIPS3