Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Son Tuan Vu

dblp:259/3393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 67% Hardware security and side channels · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › memory safety
control-flow integrity
0.512021
Reconciling optimization with secure compilation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Systems and software security › language-based security
secure compilation
0.512021
Reconciling optimization with secure compilation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel countermeasures
0.512021
Reconciling optimization with secure compilation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Compilers and program optimization
compiler optimization
0.512021
Reconciling optimization with secure compilation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021
Compilers and program optimization
secure compilation
0.512021
Reconciling optimization with secure compilation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial ordering of observations · 1.0opacification mechanism · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Reconciling optimization with secure compilation
abstract
Software protections against side-channel and physical attacks are essential to the development of secure applications. Such protections are meaningful at machine code or micro-architectural level, but they typically do not carry observable semantics at source level. This renders them susceptible to miscompilation, and security engineers embed input/output side-effects to prevent optimizing compilers from altering them. Yet these side-effects are error-prone and compiler-dependent. The current practice involves analyzing the generated machine code to make sure security or privacy properties are still enforced. These side-effects may also be too expensive in fine-grained protections such as control-flow integrity. We introduce observations of the program state that are intrinsic to the correct execution of security protections, along with means to specify and preserve observations across the compilation flow. Such observations complement the input/output semantics-preservation contract of compilers. We introduce an opacification mechanism to preserve and enforce a partial ordering of observations. This approach is compatible with a production compiler and does not incur any modification to its optimization passes. We validate the effectiveness and performance of our approach on a range of benchmarks, expressing the secure compilation of these applications in terms of observations to be made at specific program points.
Son Tuan Vu, Albert Cohen 0001, Arnaud de Grandmaison, Christophe Guillon, Karine Heydemann
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2020 Secure delivery of program properties through optimizing compilation
abstract
Annotations and assertions capturing static program properties are ubiquitous, from robust software engineering to safety-critical or secure code. These may be functional or non-functional properties of control and data flow, memory usage, I/O and real time. We propose an approach to encode, translate, and preserve the semantics of both functional and non-functional properties along the optimizing compilation of C to machine code. The approach involves (1) capturing and translating source-level properties through lowering passes and intermediate representations, such that data and control flow optimizations will preserve their consistency with the transformed program, and (2) carrying properties and their translation as debug information down to machine code. Our experiments using LLVM validate the soundness, expressiveness and efficiency of the approach, considering a reference suite of functional properties as well as established security properties and applications hardened against side-channel attacks.
Son Tuan Vu, Karine Heydemann, Arnaud de Grandmaison, Albert Cohen 0001
CC1