Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luca Cappelletti
dblp:259/6575
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1269-2038ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 62% Computational science and engineering · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
biological knowledge graph |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
graph learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › graph learning
link prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphs · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
node embedding · 0.7graph machine learning · 0.7extract-transform-load · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | KG-Hub - building and exchanging biological knowledge graphsabstractMOTIVATION: Knowledge graphs (KGs) are a powerful approach for integrating heterogeneous data and making inferences in biology and many other domains, but a coherent solution for constructing, exchanging, and facilitating the downstream use of KGs is lacking. RESULTS: Here we present KG-Hub, a platform that enables standardized construction, exchange, and reuse of KGs. Features include a simple, modular extract-transform-load pattern for producing graphs compliant with Biolink Model (a high-level data model for standardizing biological data), easy integration of any OBO (Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies) ontology, cached downloads of upstream data sources, versioned and automatically updated builds with stable URLs, web-browsable storage of KG artifacts on cloud infrastructure, and easy reuse of transformed subgraphs across projects. Current KG-Hub projects span use cases including COVID-19 research, drug repurposing, microbial-environmental interactions, and rare disease research. KG-Hub is equipped with tooling to easily analyze and manipulate KGs. KG-Hub is also tightly integrated with graph machine learning (ML) tools which allow automated graph ML, including node embeddings and training of models for link prediction and node classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://kghub.org. J. Harry Caufield, Tim E. Putman, Kevin Schaper, Deepak R. Unni, Harshad Hegde, Tiffany Callahan, Luca Cappelletti, Sierra A. T. Moxon, Vida Ravanmehr, Seth Carbon, Lauren E. Chan, Katherina G. Cortes, Kent A. Shefchek, Glass Elsarboukh, James P. Balhoff, Tommaso Fontana, Nicolas Matentzoglu, Richard M. Bruskiewich, Anne E. Thessen, Nomi L. Harris, Monica C. Munoz-Torres, Melissa A. Haendel, Peter N. Robinson, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Chris Mungall, Justin T. Reese |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2022 | Boosting tissue-specific prediction of active cis-regulatory regions through deep learning and Bayesian optimization techniquesabstractBACKGROUND: Cis-regulatory regions (CRRs) are non-coding regions of the DNA that fine control the spatio-temporal pattern of transcription; they are involved in a wide range of pivotal processes such as the development of specific cell-lines/tissues and the dynamic cell response to physiological stimuli. Recent studies showed that genetic variants occurring in CRRs are strongly correlated with pathogenicity or deleteriousness. Considering the central role of CRRs in the regulation of physiological and pathological conditions, the correct identification of CRRs and of their tissue-specific activity status through Machine Learning methods plays a major role in dissecting the impact of genetic variants on human diseases. Unfortunately, the problem is still open, though some promising results have been already reported by (deep) machine-learning based methods that predict active promoters and enhancers in specific tissues or cell lines by encoding epigenetic or spectral features directly extracted from DNA sequences. RESULTS: We present the experiments we performed to compare two Deep Neural Networks, a Feed-Forward Neural Network model working on epigenomic features, and a Convolutional Neural Network model working only on genomic sequence, targeted to the identification of enhancer- and promoter-activity in specific cell lines. While performing experiments to understand how the experimental setup influences the prediction performance of the methods, we particularly focused on (1) automatic model selection performed by Bayesian optimization and (2) exploring different data rebalancing setups for reducing negative unbalancing effects. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that (1) automatic model selection by Bayesian optimization improves the quality of the learner; (2) data rebalancing considerably impacts the prediction performance of the models; test set rebalancing may provide over-optimistic results, and should therefore be cautiously applied; (3) despite working on sequence data, convolutional models obtain performance close to those of feed forward models working on epigenomic information, which suggests that also sequence data carries informative content for CRR-activity prediction. We therefore suggest combining both models/data types in future works. Luca Cappelletti, Alessandro Petrini, Jessica Gliozzo, Elena Casiraghi, Max Schubach, Martin Kircher, Giorgio Valentini |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2021 | Semi-automatic Column Type Inference for CSV Table Understanding
Sara Bonfitto, Luca Cappelletti, Fabrizio Trovato, Giorgio Valentini, Marco Mesiti |
SOFSEM | 2 |
| 2019 | On the Quality of Classification Models for Inferring ABAC Policies from Access LogsabstractThe attribute-based access control (ABAC) model has been gaining popularity in recent years because of its advantages in granularity, flexibility, and usability. Few approaches based on association rules mining have been proposed for the automatic generation of ABAC policies from access logs. Their aim is the identification of policies that do not overfit over training data, are not too general and thus does to disclose sensitive resources to everyone, and are interpretable by humans. The large ABAC privilege space along with the sparsity and unbalance distribution of the available logs make the solution of this task particularly complex and current approaches have different limitations. In this paper we compare different symbolic and nonsymbolic machine learning (ML) techniques for inferring ABAC policies and discuss their pros and cons. Based on experimental results on a toy dataset and on a real dataset, we argue that which is the best technique depends on the characteristics of the considered data. When the data are highly separable according to PCA and t-SNE decomposition, the quality of the obtained ABAC policies is higher and also policies are easily interpretable. By contrast, when this property does not hold, the quality of the obtained policies is low; in this case, non-symbolic ML techniques show better results than the symbolic ones. Luca Cappelletti, Stefano Valtolina, Giorgio Valentini, Marco Mesiti, Elisa Bertino |
IEEE BigData | 1 |