Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Suman Sundaresh

dblp:26/3258 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.112006
Identification of humoral immune responses in protein microarrays using DNA microarray data analysis techniques · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics
0.112006
Identification of humoral immune responses in protein microarrays using DNA microarray data analysis techniques · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112006
Identification of humoral immune responses in protein microarrays using DNA microarray data analysis techniques · Bioinform. 2006
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.011997
Selecting Features by Vertical Compactness of Data · KDD 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance estimation · 0.1normalization · 0.1differential expression analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Identification of humoral immune responses in protein microarrays using DNA microarray data analysis techniques
abstract
MOTIVATION: We present a study of antigen expression signals from a newly developed high-throughput protein microarray technique. These signals are a measure of antibody-antigen binding activity and provide a basis for understanding humoral immune responses to various infectious agents and supporting vaccine and diagnostic development. RESULTS: We investigate the characteristics of these expression profiles and show that noise models, normalization, variance estimation and differential expression analysis techniques developed in the context of DNA microarray analysis can be adapted and applied to these protein arrays. Using a high-dimensional dataset containing measurements of expression profiles of antibody reactivity against each protein (295 antigens and 9 controls) in 42 malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) protein arrays derived from 22 donors with various clinical presentations of malaria, we present a methodology for the analysis and identification of significantly expressed antigens targeted by immune responses for individual sera, groups of sera and across stages of infection. We also conduct a short study highlighting the top immunoreactive antigens where we identify three novel high priority antigens for future evaluation. AVAILABILITY: All software programs (in R) used for the analysis described in this paper are freely available for academic purposes at www.igb.uci.edu/servers/servers.html.
Suman Sundaresh, Denise L. Doolan, Siddiqua Hirst, Yunxiang Mu, Berkay Unal, D. Huw Davies, Philip L. Felgner, Pierre Baldi
Bioinform.1
2001 Building decision support systems for treating severe head injuries
abstract
In intensive care units, the patients, who are suffering from severe head injuries, usually enter a state of coma. To treat such patients, who are prone to a high risk of mortality, the neurologist adopts certain aggressive and informed decision-making procedures. Designing a decision support system (DSS) that would automate or enhance this kind of treatment procedure is difficult, due to the presence of unclear domain relationships, numerous interacting variables, time criticality and real-time multiple inputs. We illustrate how the decision analysis framework can be exploited to build a consultative DSS for severe head injury management. Specifically, we need to: (a) understand the head injury problem, with its inherent uncertainties, (b) structure the problem, and (c) discern the decision process. The designed system accepts the prognostic factors of a particular patient as input, and subsequently provides treatment advice as output. The effectiveness of the treatment is ranked in terms of patient recovery.
Charles Sheeba Dora, Manish Sarkar, Suman Sundaresh, David Harmanec, Tseng-Tsai Yeo, Kim-Leng Poh, Tze-Yun Leong
SMC3
1999 Decision analytic approach to severe head injury management
David Harmanec, Tze-Yun Leong, Suman Sundaresh, Kim-Leng Poh, Tseng-Tsai Yeo, Ivan Ng, Thomas W. Lew
AMIA3
1999 Supporting multi-level multi-perspective dynamic decision making in medicine
Suman Sundaresh, Tze-Yun Leong, Peter Haddawy
AMIA1
1997 Selecting Features by Vertical Compactness of Data
Suman Sundaresh
KDD2