Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

John J. Wiorkowski

dblp:26/3348 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › software reliability
reliability assessment		 0.011981
Capture-Recaptur Sampling for Estimating Software Error Content · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981
Software testing
statistical testing		 0.011981
Capture-Recaptur Sampling for Estimating Software Error Content · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0confidence limits · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Estimating the correctness of computer programs
Joe W. Duran, John J. Wiorkowski
 Inf. Sci.2
1981 Capture-Recaptur Sampling for Estimating Software Error Content
abstract
Mills capture-recapture sampling method allows the estimation of the number of errors in a program by randomly inserting known errors and then testing the program for both inserted and indigenous errors. This correspondence shows how correct confidence limits and maximum likelihood estimates can be obtained from the test results. Both fixed sample size testing and sequential testing are considered.
Joe W. Duran, John J. Wiorkowski
 IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2