Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tushar Chandra
dblp:26/477
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0009-0006-1475-3427ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 46% Speech recognition and synthesis · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Recommender systems · 47% Information retrieval · 31% Machine learning and data management · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 80% High-performance computing · 20% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition
error correction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mondegreen: A Post-Processing Solution to Speech Recognition Error Correction for Voice Search Queries · KDD 2021 |
Information retrieval
query processing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mondegreen: A Post-Processing Solution to Speech Recognition Error Correction for Voice Search Queries · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation Sets · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation Sets · IJCAI 2019 |
Recommender systems
reinforcement-learning-based recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation Sets · IJCAI 2019 |
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
slate recommendation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation Sets · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
production machine learning system |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Regressing Towards Simpler Prediction Systems · WSDM 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text correction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Mondegreen: A Post-Processing Solution to Speech Recognition Error Correction for Voice Search Queries · KDD 2021 |
Storage systems
distributed storage |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2008 Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data (Awarded Best Paper!) · OSDI 2006 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
projected gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensions · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensions · ICML 2008 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensions · ICML 2008 |
High-performance computing › cluster computing
commodity cluster |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-space correction · 1.0temporal difference learning · 0.8q-learning · 0.8tablet partitioning · 0.2stochastic gradient projection · 0.2sparse table data model · 0.2l1-ball projection · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Mondegreen: A Post-Processing Solution to Speech Recognition Error Correction for Voice Search QueriesabstractAs more and more online search queries come from voice, automatic speech recognition becomes a key component to deliver relevant search results. Errors introduced by automatic speech recognition (ASR) lead to irrelevant search results returned to the user, thus causing user dissatisfaction. In this paper, we introduce an approach, "Mondegreen", to correct voice queries in text space without depending on audio signals, which may not always be available due to system constraints or privacy or bandwidth (for example, some ASR systems run on-device) considerations. We focus on voice queries transcribed via several proprietary commercial ASR systems. These queries come from users making internet, or online service search queries. We first present an analysis showing how different the language distribution coming from user voice queries is from that in traditional text corpora used to train off-the-shelf ASR systems. We then demonstrate that Mondegreen can achieve significant improvements in increased user interaction by correcting user voice queries in one of the largest search systems in Google. Finally, we see Mondegreen as complementing existing highly-optimized production ASR systems, which may not be frequently retrained and thus lag behind due to vocabulary drifts. Sukhdeep S. Sodhi, Ellie Ka In Chio, Ambarish Jash, Santiago Ontañón, Ajit Apte, Ayooluwakunmi Jeje, Dima Kuzmin, Harry Fung, Heng-Tze Cheng, Jon Effrat, Tarush Bali, Nitin Jindal, Sarvjeet Singh, Senqiang Zhou, Tameen Khan, Amol Wankhede, Moustafa Farid Alzantot, Allen Wu, Tushar Chandra |
KDD | 21 |
| 2020 | Zero-Shot Heterogeneous Transfer Learning from Recommender Systems to Cold-Start Search RetrievalabstractMany recent advances in neural information retrieval models, which predict top-K items given a query, learn directly from a large training set of (query, item) pairs. However, they are often insufficient when there are many previously unseen (query, item) combinations, often referred to as the cold start problem. Furthermore, the search system can be biased towards items that are frequently shown to a query previously, also known as the 'rich get richer' (a.k.a. feedback loop) problem. In light of these problems, we observed that most online content platforms have both a search and a recommender system that, while having heterogeneous input spaces, can be connected through their common output item space and a shared semantic representation. In this paper, we propose a new Zero-Shot Heterogeneous Transfer Learning framework that transfers learned knowledge from the recommender system component to improve the search component of a content platform. First, it learns representations of items and their natural-language features by predicting (item, item) correlation graphs derived from the recommender system as an auxiliary task. Then, the learned representations are transferred to solve the target search retrieval task, performing query-to-item prediction without having seen any (query, item) pairs in training. We conduct online and offline experiments on one of the world's largest search and recommender systems from Google, and present the results and lessons learned. We demonstrate that the proposed approach can achieve high performance on offline search retrieval tasks, and more importantly, achieved significant improvements on relevance and user interactions over the highly-optimized production system in online experiments. Ellie Ka In Chio, Heng-Tze Cheng, Steffen Rendle, Dima Kuzmin, Ritesh Agarwal, Li Zhang 0001, John R. Anderson, Sarvjeet Singh, Tushar Chandra, Ed H. Chi, Alex Soares, Nitin Jindal |
CIKM | 11 |
| 2019 | SlateQ: A Tractable Decomposition for Reinforcement Learning with Recommendation SetsabstractReinforcement learning methods for recommender systems optimize recommendations for long-term user engagement. However, since users are often presented with slates of multiple items---which may have interacting effects on user choice---methods are required to deal with the combinatorics of the RL action space. We develop SlateQ, a decomposition of value-based temporal-difference and Q-learning that renders RL tractable with slates. Under mild assumptions on user choice behavior, we show that the long-term value (LTV) of a slate can be decomposed into a tractable function of its component item-wise LTVs. We demonstrate our methods in simulation, and validate the scalability and effectiveness of decomposed TD-learning on YouTube. Eugene Ie, Vihan Jain, Sanmit Narvekar, Ritesh Agarwal, Rui Wu 0020, Heng-Tze Cheng, Tushar Chandra, Craig Boutilier |
IJCAI | 8 |
| 2015 | Regressing Towards Simpler Prediction SystemsabstractThis talk will focus on our experience in managing the complexity of Sibyl, a large scale machine learning system that is widely used within Google. We believe that a large fraction of the challenges faced by Sibyl are inherent to large scale production machine learning and that other production systems are likely to encounter them as well [1]. Thus, these challenges present interesting opportunities for future research. The Sibyl system is complex for a number of reasons. We have learnt that a complete end-to-end machine learning solution has to have subsystems to address a variety of different needs: data ingestion, data analysis, data verification, experimentation, model analysis, model serving, configuration, data transformations, support for different kinds of loss functions and modeling, machine learning algorithm implementations, etc. Machine learning algorithms themselves constitute a relatively small fraction of the overall system. Tushar Chandra |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2008 | Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensionsabstractWe describe efficient algorithms for projecting a vector onto the ℓ1-ball. We present two methods for projection. The first performs exact projection in O(n) expected time, where n is the dimension of the space. The second works on vectors k of whose elements are perturbed outside the ℓ1-ball, projecting in O(k log(n)) time. This setting is especially useful for online learning in sparse feature spaces such as text categorization applications. We demonstrate the merits and effectiveness of our algorithms in numerous batch and online learning tasks. We show that variants of stochastic gradient projection methods augmented with our efficient projection procedures outperform interior point methods, which are considered state-of-the-art optimization techniques. We also show that in online settings gradient updates with ℓ1 projections outperform the exponentiated gradient algorithm while obtaining models with high degrees of sparsity. 1. John C. Duchi, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Yoram Singer, Tushar Chandra |
ICML | 4 |
| 2008 | Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured DataabstractBigtable is a distributed storage system for managing structured data that is designed to scale to a very large size: petabytes of data across thousands of commodity servers. Many projects at Google store data in Bigtable, including web indexing, Google Earth, and Google Finance. These applications place very different demands on Bigtable, both in terms of data size (from URLs to web pages to satellite imagery) and latency requirements (from backend bulk processing to real-time data serving). Despite these varied demands, Bigtable has successfully provided a flexible, high-performance solution for all of these Google products. In this article, we describe the simple data model provided by Bigtable, which gives clients dynamic control over data layout and format, and we describe the design and implementation of Bigtable. Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Michael Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, Robert Gruber |
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. | 7 |
| 2006 | Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data (Awarded Best Paper!)
Fay Chang, Jeffrey Dean, Sanjay Ghemawat, Wilson C. Hsieh, Deborah A. Wallach, Michael Burrows, Tushar Chandra, Andrew Fikes, Robert Gruber |
OSDI | 7 |