VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ryu Iida
dblp:26/5652
· DBLP profile ↗
28ranked-venue papers
12as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 26 · 12 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
13 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 36% Language models and text generation · 23% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
why-question answering |
1.6 | 5 | 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution › anaphora resolution
zero anaphora resolution |
0.7 | 5 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 A Cross-Lingual ILP Solution to Zero Anaphora Resolution · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why Questions · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
causal relation extraction |
0.7 | 3 | 2019 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017 A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural Networks · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event causality identification
causality detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › passage retrieval
answer passage retrieval |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question Answering · WSDM 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
anaphora resolution |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | A Cross-Lingual ILP Solution to Zero Anaphora Resolution · ACL 2011 Capturing Salience with a Trainable Cache Model for Zero-anaphora Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 Exploiting Syntactic Patterns as Clues in Zero-Anaphora Resolution · ACL 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question Answering · AAAI 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-Questions · AAAI 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge incorporation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background Knowledge · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Information retrieval › question answering
open-domain question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer Texts · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
reference resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Incorporating Extra-Linguistic Information into Reference Resolution in Collaborative Task Dialogue · ACL 2010 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.1 | 2 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 A Cross-Lingual ILP Solution to Zero Anaphora Resolution · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse processing
centering theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network › convolutional neural network architecture
multi-column convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Network · EMNLP 2016 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing Recognition · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Capturing Salience with a Trainable Cache Model for Zero-anaphora Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Capturing Salience with a Trainable Cache Model for Zero-anaphora Resolution · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 1.5adversarial network · 0.8BERT · 0.8integer linear programming · 0.7causality recognition · 0.6adversarial pretraining · 0.5recurrent neural network · 0.4encoder-decoder · 0.4annotation aggregation · 0.4distant supervision · 0.3attention mechanism · 0.3subject sharing recognizer · 0.2cross-lingual transfer · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | BERTAC: Enhancing Transformer-based Language Models with Adversarially Pretrained Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractJong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Torisawa. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer, Kentaro Torisawa |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Exploiting Background Knowledge in Compact Answer Generation for Why-QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a novel method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions, such as the following answer, “Because deep learning technologies were introduced,” to the question, “Why did Google’s machine translation service improve so drastically?” Although many works have dealt with why-question answering, most have focused on retrieving as answers relatively long text passages that consist of several sentences. Because of their length, such passages are not appropriate to be read aloud by spoken dialog systems and smart speakers; hence, we need to create a method that generates compact answers. We developed a novel neural summarizer for this compact answer generation task. It combines a recurrent neural network-based encoderdecoder model with stacked convolutional neural networks and was designed to effectively exploit background knowledge, in this case a set of causal relations (e.g., “[Microsoft’s machine translation has made great progress over the last few years]effect since [it started to use deep learning.]cause”) that was extracted from a large web data archive (4 billion web pages). Our experimental results show that our method achieved significantly better ROUGE F-scores than existing encoder-decoder models and their variations that were augmented with query-attention and memory networks, which are used to exploit the background knowledge. Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Open-Domain Why-Question Answering with Adversarial Learning to Encode Answer TextsabstractIn this paper, we propose a method for whyquestion answering (why-QA) that uses an adversarial learning framework.Existing why-QA methods retrieve answer passages that usually consist of several sentences.These multi-sentence passages contain not only the reason sought by a why-question and its connection to the why-question, but also redundant and/or unrelated parts.We use our proposed Adversarial networks for Generating compact-answer Representation (AGR) to generate from a passage a vector representation of the non-redundant reason sought by a why-question and exploit the representation for judging whether the passage actually answers the why-question.Through a series of experiments using Japanese why-QA datasets, we show that these representations improve the performance of our why-QA neural model as well as that of a BERT-based why-QA model.We show that they also improve a state-of-the-art distantly supervised open-domain QA (DS-QA) method on publicly available English datasets, even though the target task is not a why-QA. Jong-Hoon Oh, Kazuma Kadowaki, Julien Kloetzer, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2019 | Event Causality Recognition Exploiting Multiple Annotators' Judgments and Background KnowledgeabstractKazuma Kadowaki, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Kazuma Kadowaki, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | Semi-Distantly Supervised Neural Model for Generating Compact Answers to Open-Domain Why QuestionsabstractThis paper proposes a neural network-based method for generating compact answers to open-domain why-questions (e.g., "Why was Mr. Trump elected as the president of the US?"). Unlike factoid question answering methods that provide short text spans as answers, existing work for why-question answering have aimed at answering questions by retrieving relatively long text passages, each of which often consists of several sentences, from a text archive. While the actual answer to a why-question may be expressed over several consecutive sentences, these often contain redundant and/or unrelated parts. Such answers would not be suitable for spoken dialog systems and smart speakers such as Amazon Echo, which receive much attention in these days. In this work, we aim at generating non-redundant compact answers to why-questions from answer passages retrieved from a very large web data corpora (4 billion web pages) by an already existing open-domain why-question answering system, using a novel neural network obtained by extending existing summarization methods. We also automatically generate training data using a large number of causal relations automatically extracted from 4 billion web pages by an existing supervised causality recognizer. The data is used to train our neural network, together with manually created training data. Through a series of experiments, we show that both our novel neural network and auto-generated training data improve the quality of the generated answers both in ROUGE score and in a subjective evaluation. Ryo Ishida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Ryu Iida, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2018 | Annotating Zero Anaphora for Question Answering
Yoshihiko Asao, Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa |
LREC | 2 |
| 2017 | Multi-Column Convolutional Neural Networks with Causality-Attention for Why-Question AnsweringabstractWhy-question answering (why-QA) is a task to retrieve answers (or answer passages) to why-questions (e.g., "why are tsunamis generated?") from a text archive. Several previously proposed methods for why-QA improved their performance by automatically recognizing causalities that are expressed with such explicit cues as "because" in answer passages and using the recognized causalities as a clue for finding proper answers. However, in answer passages, causalities might be implicitly expressed, (i.e., without any explicit cues): "An earthquake suddenly displaced sea water and a tsunami was generated." The previous works did not deal with such implicitly expressed causalities and failed to find proper answers that included the causalities. We improve why-QA based on the following two ideas. First, implicitly expressed causalities in one text might be expressed in other texts with explicit cues. If we can automatically recognize such explicitly expressed causalities from a text archive and use them to complement the implicitly expressed causalities in an answer passage, we can improve why-QA. Second, the causes of similar events tend to be described with a similar set of words (e.g., "seismic energy" and "tectonic plates" for "the Great East Japan Earthquake" and "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake"). As such, even if we cannot find in a text archive any explicitly expressed cause of an event (e.g., "the Great East Japan Earthquake") expressed in a question (e.g., "Why did the Great East Japan earthquake happen?"), we might be able to identify its implicitly expressed causes with a set of words (e.g., "tectonic plates") that appear in the explicitly expressed cause of a similar event (e.g., "the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake"). Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Canasai Kruengkrai, Ryu Iida, Julien Kloetzer |
WSDM | 4 |
| 2016 | A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach to Why-Question AnsweringabstractWe propose a semi-supervised learning method for improving why-question answering (why-QA). The key of our method is to generate training data (question-answer pairs) from causal relations in texts such as "[Tsunamis are generated](effect) because [the ocean's water mass is displaced by an earthquake](cause)." A naive method for the generation would be to make a question-answer pair by simply converting the effect part of the causal relations into a why-question, like "Why are tsunamis generated?" from the above example, and using the source text of the causal relations as an answer. However, in our preliminary experiments, this naive method actually failed to improve the why-QA performance. The main reason was that the machine-generated questions were often incomprehensible like "Why does (it) happen?", and that the system suffered from overfitting to the results of our automatic causality recognizer. Hence, we developed a novel method that effectively filters out incomprehensible questions and retrieves from texts answers that are likely to be paraphrases of a given causal relation. Through a series of experiments, we showed that our approach significantly improved the precision of the top answer by 8% over the current state-of-the-art system for Japanese why-QA. Jong-Hoon Oh, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Ryu Iida, Masahiro Tanaka, Julien Kloetzer |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2016 | Intra-Sentential Subject Zero Anaphora Resolution using Multi-Column Convolutional Neural NetworkabstractThis paper proposes a method for intrasentential subject zero anaphora resolution in Japanese.Our proposed method utilizes a Multi-column Convolutional Neural Network (MCNN) for predicting zero anaphoric relations.Motivated by Centering Theory and other previous works, we exploit as clues both the surface word sequence and the dependency tree of a target sentence in our MCNN.Even though the F-score of our method was lower than that of the state-of-the-art method, which achieved relatively high recall and low precision, our method achieved much higher precision (>0.8) in a wide range of recall levels.We believe such high precision is crucial for real-world NLP applications and thus our method is preferable to the state-of-the-art method. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Jong-Hoon Oh, Canasai Kruengkrai, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | Automatic Generation of English Vocabulary Tests
Yuni Susanti, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga |
CSEDU (1) | 2 |
| 2015 | Intra-sentential Zero Anaphora Resolution using Subject Sharing RecognitionabstractIn this work, we improve the performance of intra-sentential zero anaphora resolution in Japanese using a novel method of recognizing subject sharing relations.In Japanese, a large portion of intrasentential zero anaphora can be regarded as subject sharing relations between predicates, that is, the subject of some predicate is also the unrealized subject of other predicates.We develop an accurate recognizer of subject sharing relations for pairs of predicates in a single sentence, and then construct a subject shared predicate network, which is a set of predicates that are linked by the subject sharing relations recognized by our recognizer.We finally combine our zero anaphora resolution method exploiting the subject shared predicate network and a state-ofthe-art ILP-based zero anaphora resolution method.Our combined method achieved a significant improvement over the the ILPbased method alone on intra-sentential zero anaphora resolution in Japanese.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to explicitly use an independent subject sharing recognizer in zero anaphora resolution. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Torisawa, Chikara Hashimoto, Jong-Hoon Oh, Julien Kloetzer |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | Incrementally Tracking Reference in Human/Human Dialogue Using Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic InformationabstractCasey Kennington, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga, David Schlangen. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015. Casey Kennington, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga, David Schlangen |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2014 | Collecting Pairs of Word Senses and Their Context Sentences for Generating English Vocabulary Tests
Yuni Susanti, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga |
ICCE | 2 |
| 2014 | Building a Corpus of Manually Revised Texts from Discourse Perspective
Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga |
LREC | 1 |
| 2013 | Empirical investigation on spatial templates for a diagonal spatial term
Takenobu Tokunaga, Toshiaki Watatani, Ryu Iida, Asuka Terai |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2012 | The REX corpora: A collection of multimodal corpora of referring expressions in collaborative problem solving dialogues
Takenobu Tokunaga, Ryu Iida, Asuka Terai, Naoko Kuriyama |
LREC | 2 |
| 2012 | A Unified Probabilistic Approach to Referring Expressions
Kotaro Funakoshi, Mikio Nakano, Takenobu Tokunaga, Ryu Iida |
SIGDIAL Conference | 4 |
| 2011 | A Cross-Lingual ILP Solution to Zero Anaphora Resolution
Ryu Iida, Massimo Poesio |
ACL | 1 |
| 2011 | Multi-modal Reference Resolution in Situated Dialogue by Integrating Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic Clues
Ryu Iida, Masaaki Yasuhara, Takenobu Tokunaga |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Incorporating Extra-Linguistic Information into Reference Resolution in Collaborative Task Dialogue
Ryu Iida, Syumpei Kobayashi, Takenobu Tokunaga |
ACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Towards an Extrinsic Evaluation of Referring Expressions in Situated Dialogs
Philipp Spanger, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga, Asuka Terai, Naoko Kuriyama |
INLG | 2 |
| 2010 | Annotation Process Management Revisited
Dain Kaplan, Ryu Iida, Takenobu Tokunaga |
LREC | 2 |
| 2009 | Capturing Salience with a Trainable Cache Model for Zero-anaphora Resolution
Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
ACL/IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2008 | Gloss-Based Semantic Similarity Metrics for Predominant Sense Acquisition
Ryu Iida, Diana McCarthy, Rob Koeling |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2007 | Zero-anaphora resolution by learning rich syntactic pattern featuresabstractWe approach the zero-anaphora resolution problem by decomposing it into intrasentential and intersentential zero-anaphora resolution tasks. For the former task, syntactic patterns of zeropronouns and their antecedents are useful clues. Taking Japanese as a target language, we empirically demonstrate that incorporating rich syntactic pattern features in a state-of-the-art learning-based anaphora resolution model dramatically improves the accuracy of intrasentential zero-anaphora, which consequently improves the overall performance of zero-anaphora resolution. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. | 1 |
| 2006 | Exploiting Syntactic Patterns as Clues in Zero-Anaphora ResolutionabstractWe approach the zero-anaphora resolution problem by decomposing it into intra-sentential and inter-sentential zero-anaphora resolution. For the former problem, syntactic patterns of the appearance of zero-pronouns and their antecedents are useful clues. Taking Japanese as a target language, we empirically demonstrate that incorporating rich syntactic pattern features in a state-of-the-art learning-based anaphora resolution model dramatically improves the accuracy of intra-sentential zero-anaphora, which consequently improves the overall performance of zero-anaphora resolution. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
ACL | 1 |
| 2006 | Augmenting a Semantic Verb Lexicon with a Large Scale Collection of Example Sentences
Kentaro Inui, Toru Hirano, Ryu Iida, Atsushi Fujita, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
LREC | 3 |
| 2005 | Anaphora resolution by antecedent identification followed by anaphoricity determinationabstractWe propose a machine learning-based approach to noun-phrase anaphora resolution that combines the advantages of previous learning-based models while overcoming their drawbacks. Our anaphora resolution process reverses the order of the steps in the classification-then-search model proposed by Ng and Cardie [2002b], inheriting all the advantages of that model. We conducted experiments on resolving noun-phrase anaphora in Japanese. The results show that with the selection-then-classification-based modifications, our proposed model outperforms earlier learning-based approaches. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Yuji Matsumoto 0001 |
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. | 1 |