Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pyry Matikainen

dblp:26/8611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 5 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Video understanding and tracking · 38% Reinforcement learning · 17% Learning theory · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition
0.432012
Model recommendation for action recognition · CVPR 2012
Feature seeding for action recognition · ICCV 2011
Representing Pairwise Spatial and Temporal Relations for Action Recognition · ECCV (1) 2010
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.322013
Multi-armed recommendation bandits for selecting state machine policies for robotic systems · ICRA 2013
Model recommendation for action recognition · CVPR 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.212013
Multi-armed recommendation bandits for selecting state machine policies for robotic systems · ICRA 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
classifier selection
0.112012
Model recommendation for action recognition · CVPR 2012
Recommender systems
model recommendation
0.112012
Model recommendation for action recognition · CVPR 2012
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.112011
Feature seeding for action recognition · ICCV 2011
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer
0.112011
Feature seeding for action recognition · ICCV 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012013
Multi-armed recommendation bandits for selecting state machine policies for robotic systems · ICRA 2013
Empirical software engineering
model selection
0.012012
Model recommendation for action recognition · CVPR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

collaborative filtering · 0.8multi-armed bandit · 0.3synthetic data · 0.1feature seeding · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Sensor fusion for fiducial tags: Highly robust pose estimation from single frame RGBD
abstract
Although there is an abundance of planar fiducial-marker systems proposed for augmented reality and computer-vision purposes, using them to estimate the pose accurately in robotic applications where collected data are noisy remains a challenge. This is inherently a difficult problem because these fiducial marker systems work solely within the RGB image space and the resolution of cameras on robots is often constrained. As a result, small noise in the image would cause the tag's detection process to produce large pose estimation errors. This paper describes an algorithm that improves the pose estimation accuracy of square fiducial markers in difficult scenes by fusing information from RGB and depth sensors. The algorithm retains the high detection rate and low false positive rate characteristics of fiducial systems while making them much more robust to size, lighting and sensory noise for pose estimation. The improvements make the fiducial tags suitable for robotic tasks requiring high pose accuracy in the real world environment.
Pengju Jin, Pyry Matikainen, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
IROS2
2013 Multi-armed recommendation bandits for selecting state machine policies for robotic systems
abstract
We investigate the problem of selecting a state-machine from a library to control a robot. We are particularly interested in this problem when evaluating such state machines on a particular robotics task is expensive. As a motivating example, we consider a problem where a simulated vacuuming robot must select a driving state machine well-suited for a particular (unknown) room layout. By borrowing concepts from collaborative filtering (recommender systems such as Netflix and Amazon.com), we present a multi-armed bandit formulation that incorporates recommendation techniques to efficiently select state machines for individual room layouts. We show that this formulation outperforms the individual approaches (recommendation, multi-armed bandits) as well as the baseline of selecting the `average best' state machine across all rooms.
Pyry Matikainen, P. Michael Furlong, Rahul Sukthankar, Martial Hebert
ICRA1
2012 Model recommendation for action recognition
abstract
Simply choosing one model out of a large set of possibilities for a given vision task is a surprisingly difficult problem, especially if there is limited evaluation data with which to distinguish among models, such as when choosing the best “walk” action classifier from a large pool of classifiers tuned for different viewing angles, lighting conditions, and background clutter. In this paper we suggest that this problem of selecting a good model can be recast as a recommendation problem, where the goal is to recommend a good model for a particular task based on how well a limited probe set of models appears to perform. Through this conceptual remapping, we can bring to bear all the collaborative filtering techniques developed for consumer recommender systems (e.g., Netflix, Amazon.com). We test this hypothesis on action recognition, and find that even when every model has been directly rated on a training set, recommendation finds better selections for the corresponding test set than the best performers on the training set.
Pyry Matikainen, Rahul Sukthankar, Martial Hebert
CVPR1
2011 Prop-free pointing detection in dynamic cluttered environments
abstract
Vision-based prop-free pointing detection is challenging both from an algorithmic and a systems standpoint. From a computer vision perspective, accurately determining where multiple users are pointing is difficult in cluttered environments with dynamic scene content. Standard approaches relying on appearance models or background subtraction to segment users operate poorly in this domain. We propose a method that focuses on motion analysis to detect pointing gestures and robustly estimate the pointing direction. Our algorithm is self-initializing; as the user points, we analyze the observed motion from two cameras and infer rotation centers that best explain the observed motion. From these, we group pixel-level flow into dominant pointing vectors that each originate from a rotation center and merge across views to obtain 3D pointing vectors. However, our proposed algorithm is computationally expensive, posing systems challenges even with current computing infrastructure. We achieve interactive speeds by exploiting coarse-grained parallelization over a cluster of computers. In unconstrained environments, we obtain an average angular precision of 2.7°.
Pyry Matikainen, Padmanabhan Pillai, Lily B. Mummert, Rahul Sukthankar, Martial Hebert
FG1
2011 Feature seeding for action recognition
abstract
Progress in action recognition has been in large part due to advances in the features that drive learning-based methods. However, the relative sparsity of training data and the risk of overfitting have made it difficult to directly search for good features. In this paper we suggest using synthetic data to search for robust features that can more easily take advantage of limited data, rather than using the synthetic data directly as a substitute for real data. We demonstrate that the features discovered by our selection method, which we call seeding, improve performance on an action classification task on real data, even though the synthetic data from which the features are seeded differs significantly from the real data, both in terms of appearance and the set of action classes.
Pyry Matikainen, Rahul Sukthankar, Martial Hebert
ICCV1
2010 Representing Pairwise Spatial and Temporal Relations for Action Recognition
Pyry Matikainen, Martial Hebert, Rahul Sukthankar
ECCV (1)1
2008 Fast Motion Consistency through Matrix Quantization
abstract
Determining the motion consistency between two video clips is a key component for many applications such as video event detection and human pose estimation. Shechtman and Irani recently proposed a method for measuring the motion consistency between two videos by representing the motion about each point with a space-time Harris matrix of spatial and temporal derivatives. A motion-consistency measure can be accurately estimated without explicitly calculating the optical flow from the videos, which could be noisy. However, the motion consistency calculation is computationally expensive and it must be evaluated between all possible pairs of points between the two videos. We propose a novel quantization method for the space-time Harris matrices that reduces the consistency calculation to a fast table lookup for any arbitrary consistency measure. We demonstrate that for the continuous rank drop consistency measure used by Shechtman and Irani, our quantization method is much faster and achieves the same accuracy as the existing approximation.
Pyry Matikainen, Rahul Sukthankar, Martial Hebert, Yan Ke
BMVC1