Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chao-ying Fu

dblp:26/956 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 73% Parallel and multicore computing · 27%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction-level parallelism
0.122003
Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelizing compiler
dependence graph
0.012003
Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
value speculation
0.012003
Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003
Compilers and program optimization › instruction scheduling
VLIW scheduling
0.011998
Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
value prediction
0.011998
Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value prediction · 0.0static VLIW scheduling · 0.0optimal edge selection · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem
abstract
Techniques for value speculation have been proposed for dynamically scheduled and statically scheduled machines to increase instruction-level parallelism (ILP) by breaking flow (true) dependences and allowing value-dependent operations to be executed speculatively. The effectiveness of value speculation depends upon the ability to select and break dependences to shorten overall execution time, while encountering penalties for value misprediction. To understand and improve the techniques for value speculation, we model value speculation as an optimal edge selection problem. The optimal edge selection problem involves finding a minimal set of edges (dependences) to break in a data dependence graph that achieves maximal benefits from value speculation, while taking the penalties for value misprediction into account. Based on three properties observed from the optimal edge selection problem, an efficient optimal edge selection algorithm is designed. From the experimental results of running the optimal edge selection algorithm for the 20 most heavily executed paths selected from each SPECint95 benchmark, several insights are shown. The average critical path reduction is 9.61 percent on an average and 25.57 percent at its maximum. Surprisingly, 66 percent of the edges selected by the optimal algorithm have value prediction accuracies over 99 percent. Moreover, most of the selected edges cross the middle of the data dependence graph. The selected producer operations thereby tend to reside in the upper portion of the data dependence graph, while the selected consumer operations appear toward the lower portion.
Chao-ying Fu, Jill T. Bodine, Thomas M. Conte
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1998 Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors
abstract
Recent research in value prediction shows a surprising amount of predictability for the values produced by register-writing instructions. Several hardware based value predictor designs have been proposed to exploit this predictability by eliminating flow dependencies for highly predictable values. This paper proposed a hardware and software based scheme for value speculation scheduling (VSS). Static VLIW scheduling techniques are used to speculate value dependent instructions by scheduling them above the instructions whose results they are dependent on. Prediction hardware is used to provide value predictions for allowing the execution of speculated instructions to continue. In the case of miss-predicted values, control flow is redirected to patch-up code so that execution can proceed with the correct results. In this paper, experiments in VSS for load operations in the SPECint95 benchmarks are performed. Speedup of up to 17% has been shown for using VSS. Empirical results on the value predictability of loads, based on value profiling data, are also provided.
Chao-ying Fu, Matthew D. Jennings, Sergei Y. Larin, Thomas M. Conte
ASPLOS1