Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chao-ying Fu
dblp:26/956
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 73% Parallel and multicore computing · 27% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction-level parallelism |
0.1 | 2 | 2003 | Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003 Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelizing compiler
dependence graph |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
value speculation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection Problem · IEEE Trans. Computers 2003 |
Compilers and program optimization › instruction scheduling
VLIW scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
value prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance Processors · ASPLOS 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value prediction · 0.0static VLIW scheduling · 0.0optimal edge selection · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Modeling Value Speculation: An Optimal Edge Selection ProblemabstractTechniques for value speculation have been proposed for dynamically scheduled and statically scheduled machines to increase instruction-level parallelism (ILP) by breaking flow (true) dependences and allowing value-dependent operations to be executed speculatively. The effectiveness of value speculation depends upon the ability to select and break dependences to shorten overall execution time, while encountering penalties for value misprediction. To understand and improve the techniques for value speculation, we model value speculation as an optimal edge selection problem. The optimal edge selection problem involves finding a minimal set of edges (dependences) to break in a data dependence graph that achieves maximal benefits from value speculation, while taking the penalties for value misprediction into account. Based on three properties observed from the optimal edge selection problem, an efficient optimal edge selection algorithm is designed. From the experimental results of running the optimal edge selection algorithm for the 20 most heavily executed paths selected from each SPECint95 benchmark, several insights are shown. The average critical path reduction is 9.61 percent on an average and 25.57 percent at its maximum. Surprisingly, 66 percent of the edges selected by the optimal algorithm have value prediction accuracies over 99 percent. Moreover, most of the selected edges cross the middle of the data dependence graph. The selected producer operations thereby tend to reside in the upper portion of the data dependence graph, while the selected consumer operations appear toward the lower portion. Chao-ying Fu, Jill T. Bodine, Thomas M. Conte |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 1998 | Value Speculation Scheduling for High Performance ProcessorsabstractRecent research in value prediction shows a surprising amount of predictability for the values produced by register-writing instructions. Several hardware based value predictor designs have been proposed to exploit this predictability by eliminating flow dependencies for highly predictable values. This paper proposed a hardware and software based scheme for value speculation scheduling (VSS). Static VLIW scheduling techniques are used to speculate value dependent instructions by scheduling them above the instructions whose results they are dependent on. Prediction hardware is used to provide value predictions for allowing the execution of speculated instructions to continue. In the case of miss-predicted values, control flow is redirected to patch-up code so that execution can proceed with the correct results. In this paper, experiments in VSS for load operations in the SPECint95 benchmarks are performed. Speedup of up to 17% has been shown for using VSS. Empirical results on the value predictability of loads, based on value profiling data, are also provided. Chao-ying Fu, Matthew D. Jennings, Sergei Y. Larin, Thomas M. Conte |
ASPLOS | 1 |