VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aitor Lewkowycz
dblp:260/0820
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 42% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 2 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
distributed training systems |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqio · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Effect of scale on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks · ICLR 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › compositional generalization
length generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
mathematical problem solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › mathematical reasoning
numerical reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
l2 regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
model parallelism |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Effect of scale on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 0.7pathways · 0.7scratchpad prompting · 0.6scaling analysis · 0.6large language model pre-training · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6chain-of-thought prompting · 0.6learning rate scheduling · 0.4l2 regularization · 0.4gradient flow analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with PathwaysabstractLarge language models have been shown to achieve remarkable performance across a variety of natural language tasks using few-shot learning, which drastically reduces the number of task-specific training examples needed to adapt the model to a particular application. To further our understanding of the impact of scale on few-shot learning, we trained a 540-billion parameter, densely activated, Transformer language model, which we call Pathways Language Model (PaLM). We trained PaLM on 6144 TPU v4 chips using Pathways, a new ML system which enables highly efficient training across multiple TPU Pods. We demonstrate continued benefits of scaling by achieving state-of-the-art few-shot learning results on hundreds of language understanding and generation benchmarks. On a number of these tasks, PaLM 540B achieves breakthrough performance, outperforming the finetuned state-of-the-art on a suite of multi-step reasoning tasks, and outperforming average human performance on the recently released BIG-bench benchmark. A significant number of BIG-bench tasks showed discontinuous improvements from model scale, meaning that performance steeply increased as we scaled to our largest model. PaLM also has strong capabilities in multilingual tasks and source code generation, which we demonstrate on a wide array of benchmarks. We additionally provide a comprehensive analysis on bias and toxicity, and study the extent of training data memorization with respect to model scale. Finally, we discuss the ethical considerations related to large language models and discuss potential mitigation strategies. Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham 0001, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, Parker Schuh, Kensen Shi, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Joshua Maynez, Abhishek Rao, Parker Barnes, Yi Tay, Noam Shazeer, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Emily Reif, Nan Du 0002, Ben Hutchinson, Reiner Pope, Jacob Austin, Michael Isard, Guy Gur-Ari, Toju Duke, Anselm Levskaya, Sanjay Ghemawat, Sunipa Dev, Henryk Michalewski, Xavier Garcia, Vedant Misra, Kevin Robinson, William Fedus, Denny Zhou, Daphne Ippolito, David Luan, Hyeontaek Lim, Barret Zoph, Alexander Spiridonov, Ryan Sepassi, David Dohan, Shivani Agrawal, Mark Omernick, Andrew M. Dai, Thanumalayan Sankaranarayana Pillai, Marie Pellat, Aitor Lewkowycz, Erica Moreira, Rewon Child, Oleksandr Polozov, Katherine Lee, Zongwei Zhou, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Brennan Saeta, Mark Diaz, Orhan Firat, Michele Catasta, Jason Wei, Kathy Meier-Hellstern, Douglas Eck, Jeffrey Dean, Slav Petrov, Noah Fiedel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 51 |
| 2023 | Scaling Up Models and Data with t5x and seqioabstractScaling up training datasets and model parameters have benefited neural network-based language models, but also present challenges like distributed compute, input data bottlenecks and reproducibility of results. We introduce two simple and scalable software libraries that simplify these issues: t5x enables training large language models at scale, while seqio enables reproducible input and evaluation pipelines. These open-source libraries have been used to train models with hundreds of billions of parameters on multi-terabyte datasets. Configurations and instructions for T5-like and GPT-like models are also provided. The libraries can be found at https://github.com/google-research/t5x and https://github.com/google/seqio. Adam Roberts, Hyung Won Chung, Anselm Levskaya, Daniel Andor, Sharan Narang, Brian Lester, Colin Gaffney, Afroz Mohiuddin, Curtis Hawthorne, Aitor Lewkowycz, Alex Salcianu, Marc van Zee, Jacob Austin, Sebastian Goodman, Livio B. Soares, Haitang Hu, Sasha Tsvyashchenko, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Jasmijn Bastings, Jannis Bulian, Xavier Garcia, Jianmo Ni, Kathleen Kenealy, Kehang Han, Michelle Casbon, Jonathan H. Clark, Stephan Lee, Dan Garrette, James Lee-Thorp, Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Marvin Ritter, Maarten Bosma, Alexandre Tachard Passos, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Noah Fiedel, Mark Omernick, Brennan Saeta, Ryan Sepassi, Alexander Spiridonov, Joshua Newlan, Andrea Gesmundo |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 12 |
| 2022 | Effect of scale on catastrophic forgetting in neural networks
Vinay V. Ramasesh, Aitor Lewkowycz, Ethan Dyer |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Exploring Length Generalization in Large Language ModelsabstractThe ability to extrapolate from short problem instances to longer ones is an important form of out-of-distribution generalization in reasoning tasks, and is crucial when learning from datasets where longer problem instances are rare. These include theorem proving, solving quantitative mathematics problems, and reading/summarizing novels. In this paper, we run careful empirical studies exploring the length generalization capabilities of transformer-based language models. We first establish that naively finetuning transformers on length generalization tasks shows significant generalization deficiencies independent of model scale. We then show that combining pretrained large language models' in-context learning abilities with scratchpad prompting (asking the model to output solution steps before producing an answer) results in a dramatic improvement in length generalization. We run careful failure analyses on each of the learning modalities and identify common sources of mistakes that highlight opportunities in equipping language models with the ability to generalize to longer problems. Cem Anil, Yuhuai Wu, Anders Andreassen, Aitor Lewkowycz, Vedant Misra, Vinay V. Ramasesh, Ambrose Slone, Guy Gur-Ari, Ethan Dyer, Behnam Neyshabur |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsabstractLanguage models have achieved remarkable performance on a wide range of tasks that require natural language understanding. Nevertheless, state-of-the-art models have generally struggled with tasks that require quantitative reasoning, such as solving mathematics, science, and engineering questions at the college level. To help close this gap, we introduce Minerva, a large language model pretrained on general natural language data and further trained on technical content. The model achieves strong performance in a variety of evaluations, including state-of-the-art performance on the MATH dataset. We also evaluate our model on over two hundred undergraduate-level problems in physics, biology, chemistry, economics, and other sciences that require quantitative reasoning, and find that the model can correctly answer nearly a quarter of them. Aitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer, Henryk Michalewski, Vinay V. Ramasesh, Ambrose Slone, Cem Anil, Imanol Schlag, Theo Gutman-Solo, Yuhuai Wu, Behnam Neyshabur, Guy Gur-Ari, Vedant Misra |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | On the training dynamics of deep networks with $L_2$ regularizationabstractWe study the role of $L_2$ regularization in deep learning, and uncover simple relations between the performance of the model, the $L_2$ coefficient, the learning rate, and the number of training steps. These empirical relations hold when the network is overparameterized. They can be used to predict the optimal regularization parameter of a given model. In addition, based on these observations we propose a dynamical schedule for the regularization parameter that improves performance and speeds up training. We test these proposals in modern image classification settings. Finally, we show that these empirical relations can be understood theoretically in the context of infinitely wide networks. We derive the gradient flow dynamics of such networks, and compare the role of $L_2$ regularization in this context with that of linear models. Aitor Lewkowycz, Guy Gur-Ari |
NeurIPS | 1 |