Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Beheshteh T. Rakhshan

dblp:260/6914 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
leverage score sampling
0.812024
Efficient Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Train Decomposition · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
randomized numerical linear algebra
0.812024
Efficient Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Train Decomposition · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition
tensor decomposition
0.812024
Efficient Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Train Decomposition · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition › tensor decomposition
tensor train decomposition
0.812024
Efficient Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Train Decomposition · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sketching · 0.8alternating least squares · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Efficient Leverage Score Sampling for Tensor Train Decomposition
abstract
Tensor Train~(TT) decomposition is widely used in the machine learning and quantum physics communities as a popular tool to efficiently compress high-dimensional tensor data. In this paper, we propose an efficient algorithm to accelerate computing the TT decomposition with the Alternating Least Squares (ALS) algorithm relying on exact leverage scores sampling. For this purpose, we propose a data structure that allows us to efficiently sample from the tensor with time complexity logarithmic in the product of the tensor dimensions. Our contribution specifically leverages the canonical form of the TT decomposition. By maintaining the canonical form through each iteration of ALS, we can efficiently compute (and sample from) the leverage scores, thus achieving significant speed-up in solving each sketched least-square problem. Experiments on synthetic and real data on dense and sparse tensors demonstrate that our method outperforms SVD-based and ALS-based algorithms.
Vivek Bharadwaj, Beheshteh T. Rakhshan, Osman Asif Malik, Guillaume Rabusseau
NeurIPS2
2020 Tensorized Random Projections
abstract
We introduce a novel random projection technique for efficiently reducing the dimension of very high-dimensional tensors. Building upon classical results on Gaussian random projections and Johnson-Lindenstrauss transforms (JLT), we propose two tensorized random projection maps relying on the tensor train (TT) and CP decomposition format, respectively. The two maps offer very low memory requirements and can be applied efficiently when the inputs are low rank tensors given in the CP or TT format.Our theoretical analysis shows that the dense Gaussian matrix in JLT can be replaced by a low-rank tensor implicitly represented in compressed form with random factors, while still approximately preserving the Euclidean distance of the projected inputs. In addition, our results reveal that the TT format is substantially superior to CP in terms of the size of the random projection needed to achieve the same distortion ratio. Experiments on synthetic data validate our theoretical analysis and demonstrate the superiority of the TT decomposition.
Beheshteh T. Rakhshan, Guillaume Rabusseau
AISTATS1