Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ivan Stenius

dblp:260/8757 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7542-3225ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 40% Robot navigation and mapping · 36% Legged, aerial and field robots · 24%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › environment mapping
bathymetric mapping
0.912025
Efficient Non-Myopic Layered Bayesian Optimization for Large-Scale Bathymetric Informative Path Planning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
informative path planning
0.912025
Efficient Non-Myopic Layered Bayesian Optimization for Large-Scale Bathymetric Informative Path Planning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle
0.712023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
field robotics
0.712023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.712023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
nonlinear model predictive control
0.712023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.712023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
localization uncertainty
0.312025
Efficient Non-Myopic Layered Bayesian Optimization for Large-Scale Bathymetric Informative Path Planning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control architecture
behavior tree
0.212023
Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree search · 0.9stochastic variational inference · 0.9gaussian process · 0.9bayesian optimization · 0.9nonlinear model predictive control · 0.7hybrid control · 0.7behavior trees · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Efficient Non-Myopic Layered Bayesian Optimization for Large-Scale Bathymetric Informative Path Planning
abstract
Informative path planning (IPP) applied to bathy-metric mapping allows AUVs to focus on feature-rich areas to quickly reduce uncertainty and increase mapping efficiency. Existing methods based on Bayesian optimization (BO) over Gaussian Process (GP) maps work well on small scenarios but they are short-sighted and computationally heavy when mapping larger areas, hindering deployment in real applications. To overcome this, we present a 2-layered BO IPP method that performs non-myopic, online planning in a tree search fashion over large Stochastic Variational GP maps, while respecting the AUV dynamical constraints and accounting for localization uncertainty. Our framework outperforms the standard industrial lawn-mowing pattern and a myopic baseline in a set of hardware in the loop (HIL) experiments in an embedded platform over real bathymetry areas.
Alexander Kiessling, Ignacio Torroba, Chelsea Sidrane, Ivan Stenius, Jana Tumova, John Folkesson
ICRA4
2025 Side Scan Sonar-based SLAM for Autonomous Algae Farm Monitoring
abstract
The transition of seaweed farming to an alternative food source on an industrial scale relies on automating its processes through smart farming, equivalent to land agriculture. Key to this process are autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) via their capacity to automate crop and structural inspections. However, the current bottleneck for their deployment is ensuring safe navigation within farms, which requires an accurate, online estimate of the AUV pose and map of the infrastructure. To enable this, we propose an efficient side scan sonar-based (SSS) simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) framework that exploits the geometry of kelp farms via modeling structural ropes in the back-end as sequences of individual landmarks from each SSS ping detection, instead of combining detections into elongated representations. Our method outperforms state of the art solutions in hardware in the loop (HIL) experiments on a real AUV survey in a kelp farm. The framework and dataset can be found at https://github.com/julRusVal/sss_farm_slam.
Julian Valdez, Ignacio Torroba, John Folkesson, Ivan Stenius
IROS4
2023 Controlling an Underactuated AUV as an Inverted Pendulum using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control and Behavior Trees
abstract
Agile and hydrobatic maneuvering capabilities can enhance AUV operations in increasingly challenging scenarios. In this paper, we explore the ability of an underactuated AUV to transition to and hold a pitch angle close to 90 degrees at a particular depth, like an inverted pendulum. Holding such an orientation can be valuable in observing a calving glacier, under-ice launch and recovery, underwater docking, inspecting vertical structures, and observing targets above the water surface. However, such control is challenging because of underactuation, rapid response times and varying stability in different configurations. To address this, a control policy is derived offline using nonlinear MPC in a high-fidelity simulation environment in Simulink. For real-time control, a hybrid controller using a behavior tree (BT) is developed based on the optimal MPC policy and applied on the AUV system. The BT controller considers Safety, Transit and Stabilize behaviors. The control algorithm is validated with simulations in Simulink and Stonefish-ROS as well as field experiments with the hydrobatic SAM AUV, showing repeatable performance in the inverted pendulum maneuver.
Sriharsha Vishnu Bhat, Ivan Stenius
ICRA2