The Memory stress (Mess) framework provides a unified view of the memory system benchmarking, simulation and application profiling. The Mess benchmark provides a holistic and detailed memory system characterization. It is based on hundreds of measurements that are represented as a family of bandwidth-latency curves. The benchmark increases the coverage of all the previous tools and leads to new findings in the behavior of the actual and simulated memory systems. We deploy the Mess benchmark to characterize Intel, AMD, IBM, Fujitsu, Amazon and NVIDIA servers with DDR4, DDR5, HBM2 and HBM2E memory. The Mess memory simulator uses bandwidth-latency concept for the memory performance simulation. We integrate Mess with widely-used CPUs simulators enabling modeling of all high-end memory technologies. The Mess simulator is fast, easy to integrate and it closely matches the actual system performance. By design, it enables a quick adoption of new memory technologies in hardware simulators. Finally, the Mess application profiling positions the application in the bandwidth-latency space of the target memory system. This information can be correlated with other application runtime activities and the source code, leading to a better overall understanding of the application's behavior. The current Mess benchmark release covers all major CPU and GPU ISAs, x86, ARM, Power, RISC-V, and NVIDIA's PTX. We also release as open source the ZSim, gem5 and OpenPiton Metro-MPI integrated with the Mess simulator for DDR4, DDR5, Optane, HBM2, HBM2E and CXL memory expanders. The Mess application profiling is already integrated into a suite of production HPC performance analysis tools.

Abstract Memory prefetcher algorithms are widely used in processors to mitigate the performance gap between the processors and the memory subsystem. The complexities behind the architectures and prefetcher algorithms, however, not only hinder the development of accurate architecture simulators, but also hinder understanding the prefetcher's contribution to performance, on both a real hardware and in a simulated environment. In this paper, we contribute to shed light on the memory prefetcher's role in the performance of parallel High‐Performance Computing applications, considering the prefetcher algorithms offered by both the real hardware and the simulators. We performed a careful experimental investigation, executing the NAS parallel benchmark (NPB) on a real Skylake machine, and as well in a simulated environment with the ZSim and Sniper simulators, taking into account the prefetcher algorithms offered by both Skylake and the simulators. Our experimental results show that: (i) prefetching from the L3 to L2 cache presents better performance gains, (ii) the memory contention in the parallel execution constrains the prefetcher's effect, (iii) Skylake's parallel memory contention is poorly simulated by ZSim and Sniper, and (iv) Skylake's noninclusive L3 cache hinders the accurate simulation of NPB with the Sniper's prefetchers.