Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas Mulder
dblp:261/2077
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Query processing and optimization · 59% Graph data management · 41% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
graph query optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing navigational graph queries · VLDB J. 2025 |
Query processing and optimization
cardinality estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AvantGraph Query Processing Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Graph data management
graph query processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AvantGraph Query Processing Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Graph data management › graph query
navigational query |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing navigational graph queries · VLDB J. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
query planning · 0.6cardinality estimation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimizing navigational graph queriesabstractAbstract We study the optimization of navigational graph queries in the form of the Regular Queries, i.e., queries which combine recursive and pattern-matching fragments. Current approaches to their evaluation are not effective in practice. Towards addressing this, we present a number of novel powerful optimization techniques which aim to constrain the intermediate results during query evaluation. We show how these techniques can be planned effectively and executed efficiently towards the first practical evaluation solution for complex navigational queries on real-world workloads. Indeed, our experimental results show several orders of magnitude improvement in query evaluation performance over state-of-the-art techniques on a wide range of queries on diverse datasets. Thomas Mulder, George Fletcher 0001, Nikolay Yakovets |
VLDB J. | 1 |
| 2022 | AvantGraph Query Processing EngineabstractWe demonstrate AvantGraph, a graph query processing engine developed by the Database group at TU Eindhoven. Designed for efficient processing of both subgraph matching and navigational graph queries, AvantGraph encompasses innovation in three key areas: the planner, the cardinality estimator, and the execution engine. We present demonstration scenarios covering a wide range of workloads across diverse domains which (1) provides deep insights into the core challenges of complex graph query processing and (2) showcases corresponding critical optimizations via "under-the-hood" operational insights of AvantGraph's key components. Wilco van Leeuwen, Thomas Mulder, Bram Van De Wall, George Fletcher 0001, Nikolay Yakovets |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2020 | Towards Planning of Regular Queries with Memory
Thomas Mulder, Nikolay Yakovets, George Fletcher 0001 |
EDBT | 1 |