Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Mulder

dblp:261/2077 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 59% Graph data management · 41%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization › query optimization
graph query optimization
0.912025
Optimizing navigational graph queries · VLDB J. 2025
Query processing and optimization
cardinality estimation
0.612022
AvantGraph Query Processing Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022
Graph data management
graph query processing
0.612022
AvantGraph Query Processing Engine · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022
Graph data management › graph query
navigational query
0.312025
Optimizing navigational graph queries · VLDB J. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

query planning · 0.6cardinality estimation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimizing navigational graph queries
abstract
Abstract We study the optimization of navigational graph queries in the form of the Regular Queries, i.e., queries which combine recursive and pattern-matching fragments. Current approaches to their evaluation are not effective in practice. Towards addressing this, we present a number of novel powerful optimization techniques which aim to constrain the intermediate results during query evaluation. We show how these techniques can be planned effectively and executed efficiently towards the first practical evaluation solution for complex navigational queries on real-world workloads. Indeed, our experimental results show several orders of magnitude improvement in query evaluation performance over state-of-the-art techniques on a wide range of queries on diverse datasets.
Thomas Mulder, George Fletcher 0001, Nikolay Yakovets
VLDB J.1
2022 AvantGraph Query Processing Engine
abstract
We demonstrate AvantGraph, a graph query processing engine developed by the Database group at TU Eindhoven. Designed for efficient processing of both subgraph matching and navigational graph queries, AvantGraph encompasses innovation in three key areas: the planner, the cardinality estimator, and the execution engine. We present demonstration scenarios covering a wide range of workloads across diverse domains which (1) provides deep insights into the core challenges of complex graph query processing and (2) showcases corresponding critical optimizations via "under-the-hood" operational insights of AvantGraph's key components.
Wilco van Leeuwen, Thomas Mulder, Bram Van De Wall, George Fletcher 0001, Nikolay Yakovets
Proc. VLDB Endow.2
2020 Towards Planning of Regular Queries with Memory
Thomas Mulder, Nikolay Yakovets, George Fletcher 0001
EDBT1