Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nicola Fossati
dblp:261/2390
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › approximate computing
precision tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms
approximate computing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021 |
Emerging computing paradigms › approximate computing
precision tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
integer programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation Systems · DAC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
integer linear programming · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Architecture-aware Precision Tuning with Multiple Number Representation SystemsabstractPrecision tuning trades accuracy for speed and energy savings, usually by reducing the data width, or by switching from floating point to fixed point representations. However, comparing the precision across different representations is a difficult task. We present a metric that enables this comparison, and employ it to build a methodology based on Integer Linear Programming for tuning the data type selection. We apply the proposed metric and methodology to a range of processors, demonstrating an improvement in performance (up to $9 \times)$ with a very limited precision loss $(\lt 2.8$% for 90% of the benchmarks) on the PolyBench benchmark suite. Daniele Cattaneo 0002, Michele Chiari, Nicola Fossati, Stefano Cherubin, Giovanni Agosta |
DAC | 3 |