Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arnav Chavan
dblp:261/3846
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
9since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6053-0703ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 62% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% Trustworthy machine learning · 12% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
3.8 | 6 | 2024 | Faster and Lighter LLMs: A Survey on Current Challenges and Way Forward · IJCAI 2024 Surgical Feature-Space Decomposition of LLMs: Why, When and How? · ACL (1) 2024 A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Faster and Lighter LLMs: A Survey on Current Challenges and Way Forward · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
low-rank approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Surgical Feature-Space Decomposition of LLMs: Why, When and How? · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias in language models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning and quantization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Kernel Selection for Improved Generalization and Memory Efficiency in Meta-learning · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
dynamic pruning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Kernel Selection for Improved Generalization and Memory Efficiency in Meta-learning · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Vision Transformer Slimming: Multi-Dimension Searching in Continuous Optimization Space · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | ChipNet: Budget-Aware Pruning with Heaviside Continuous Approximations · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language Models · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
gradient-based meta-learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Kernel Selection for Improved Generalization and Memory Efficiency in Meta-learning · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Dynamic Kernel Selection for Improved Generalization and Memory Efficiency in Meta-learning · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight decomposition · 0.8feature-space decomposition · 0.8quantization · 0.7pruning · 0.7distillation · 0.7single-shot training · 0.6meta-learning · 0.6l1 sparsity constraint · 0.6dynamic kernel selection · 0.6continuous optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Surgical Feature-Space Decomposition of LLMs: Why, When and How?abstractLow-rank approximations, of the weight and feature space can enhance the performance of deep learning models, whether in terms of improving generalization or reducing the latency of inference.However, there is no clear consensus yet on how, when and why these approximations are helpful for large language models (LLMs).In this work, we empirically study the efficacy of weight and feature space decomposition in transformer-based LLMs.We demonstrate that surgical decomposition not only provides critical insights into the trade-off between compression and language modelling performance, but also sometimes enhances commonsense reasoning performance of LLMs.Our empirical analysis identifies specific network segments that intrinsically exhibit a low-rank structure.Furthermore, we extend our investigation to the implications of low-rank approximations on model bias.Overall, our findings offer a novel perspective on optimizing LLMs, presenting the low-rank approximation not only as a tool for performance enhancements, but also as a means to potentially rectify biases within these models.Our code is available at GitHub. Arnav Chavan, Nahush Lele |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Faster and Lighter LLMs: A Survey on Current Challenges and Way Forward
Arnav Chavan, Raghav Magazine, Shubham Kushwaha, Mérouane Debbah |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2023 | A Comparative Study on the Impact of Model Compression Techniques on Fairness in Language ModelsabstractCompression techniques for deep learning have become increasingly popular, particularly in settings where latency and memory constraints are imposed.Several methods, such as pruning, distillation, and quantization, have been adopted for compressing models, each providing distinct advantages.However, existing literature demonstrates that compressing deep learning models could affect their fairness.Our analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of pruned, distilled, and quantized language models, which we benchmark across a range of intrinsic and extrinsic metrics for measuring bias in text classification.We also investigate the impact of using multilingual models and evaluation measures.Our findings highlight the significance of considering both the pre-trained model and the chosen compression strategy in developing equitable language technologies.The results also indicate that compression strategies can have an adverse effect on fairness measures. Krithika Ramesh, Arnav Chavan, Shrey Pandit, Sunayana Sitaram |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | On Designing Light-Weight Object Trackers Through Network Pruning: Use CNNS or Transformers?abstractObject trackers deployed on low-power devices need to be light-weight, however, most of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods rely on using compute-heavy backbones built using CNNs or Transformers. Large sizes of such models do not allow their deployment in low-power conditions and designing compressed variants of large tracking models is of great importance. This paper demonstrates how highly compressed light-weight object trackers can be designed using neural architectural pruning of large CNN and Transformer based trackers. Further, a comparative study on architectural choices best suited to design lightweight trackers is provided. A comparison between SOTA trackers using CNNs, Transformers as well as the combination of the two is presented to study their stability at various compression ratios. Finally results for extreme pruning scenarios going as low as 1% in some cases are shown to study the limits of network pruning in object tracking. This work provides deeper insights into designing highly efficient trackers from existing SOTA methods.1 Saksham Aggarwal, Taneesh Gupta, Pawan Kumar Sahu, Arnav Chavan, Rishabh Tiwari, Dilip K. Prasad |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2022 | Vision Transformer Slimming: Multi-Dimension Searching in Continuous Optimization SpaceabstractThis paper explores the feasibility of finding an optimal sub-model from a vision transformer and introduces a pure vision transformer slimming (ViT-Slim) framework. It can search a sub-structure from the original model end-to-end across multiple dimensions, including the input tokens, MHSA and MLP modules with state-of-the-art performance. Our method is based on a learnable and unified ℓ1sparsity constraint with pre-defined factors to reflect the global importance in the continuous searching space of different dimensions. The searching process is highly efficient through a single-shot training scheme. For instance, on DeiT-S, ViT-Slim only takes ~43 GPU hours for the searching process, and the searched structure is flexible with diverse dimensionalities in different modules. Then, a budget threshold is employed according to the requirements of accuracy-FLOPs trade-off on running devices, and a retraining process is performed to obtain the final model. The extensive experiments show that our ViT-Slim can compress up to 40% of parameters and 40% FLOPs on various vision transformers while increasing the accuracy by ~0.6% on ImageNet. We also demonstrate the advantage of our searched models on several downstream datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/Arnav0400/ViT-Slim. Arnav Chavan, Zhuang Liu 0003, Zechun Liu, Kwang-Ting Cheng, Eric P. Xing |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2022 | Dynamic Kernel Selection for Improved Generalization and Memory Efficiency in Meta-learningabstractGradient based meta-learning methods are prone to overfit on the meta-training set, and this behaviour is more prominent with large and complex networks. Moreover, large networks restrict the application of meta-learning models on low-power edge devices. While choosing smaller networks avoid these issues to a certain extent, it affects the overall generalization leading to reduced performance. Clearly, there is an approximately optimal choice of network architecture that is best suited for every meta-learning problem, however, identifying it beforehand is not straight-forward. In this paper, we present Metadock, a task-specific dynamic kernel selection strategy for designing compressed CNN models that generalize well on unseen tasks in meta-learning. Our method is based on the hypothesis that for a given set of similar tasks, not all kernels of the network are needed by each individual task. Rather, each task uses only a fraction of the kernels, and the selection of the kernels per task can be learnt dynamically as a part of the inner update steps. Metadockcompresses the meta-model as well as the task-specific inner models, thus providing significant reduction in model size for each task, and through constraining the number of active kernels for every task, it implicitly mitigates the issue of meta-overfitting. We show that for the same inference budget, pruned versions of large CNN models obtained using our approach consistently outperform the conventional choices of CNN models. Metadock couples well with popular meta-learning approaches such as iMAML [22]. The efficacy of our method is validated on CIFAR-fs [1] and mini-ImageNet [28] datasets, and we have observed that our approach can provide improvements in model accuracy of up to 2% on standard meta-learning benchmark, while reducing the model size by more than 75%. Our code is available at https://github.com/transmuteAI/MetaDOCK. Arnav Chavan, Rishabh Tiwari, Udbhav Bamba |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Rescaling CNN Through Learnable Repetition of Network ParametersabstractDeeper and wider CNNs are known to provide improved performance for deep learning tasks. However, most such networks have poor performance gain per parameter increase. In this paper, we investigate whether the gain observed in deeper models is purely due to the addition of more optimization parameters or whether the physical size of the network as well plays a role. Further, we present a novel rescaling strategy for CNNs based on learnable repetition of its parameters. Based on this strategy, we rescale CNNs without changing their parameter count, and show that learnable sharing of weights itself can provide significant boost in the performance of any given model without changing its parameter count. We show that small base networks when rescaled, can provide performance comparable to deeper networks with as low as 6% of optimization parameters of the deeper one. The relevance of weight sharing is further highlighted through the example of group-equivariant CNNs. We show that the significant improvements obtained with group-equivariant CNNs over the regular CNNs on classification problems are only partly due to the added equivariance property, and part of it comes from the learnable repetition of network weights. For rot-MNIST dataset, we show that up to 40% of the relative gain reported by state-of-the-art methods for rotation equivariance could actually be due to just the learnt repetition of weights.11Code is publicly available at https://github.com/transmuteAI/RepeatNet Arnav Chavan, Udbhav Bamba, Rishabh Tiwari |
ICIP | 1 |
| 2021 | ChipNet: Budget-Aware Pruning with Heaviside Continuous Approximations
Rishabh Tiwari, Udbhav Bamba, Arnav Chavan |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Deep learning for detection and segmentation of artefact and disease instances in gastrointestinal endoscopyabstractThe Endoscopy Computer Vision Challenge (EndoCV) is a crowd-sourcing initiative to address eminent problems in developing reliable computer aided detection and diagnosis endoscopy systems and suggest a pathway for clinical translation of technologies. Whilst endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and treatment tool for hollow-organs, there are several core challenges often faced by endoscopists, mainly: 1) presence of multi-class artefacts that hinder their visual interpretation, and 2) difficulty in identifying subtle precancerous precursors and cancer abnormalities. Artefacts often affect the robustness of deep learning methods applied to the gastrointestinal tract organs as they can be confused with tissue of interest. EndoCV2020 challenges are designed to address research questions in these remits. In this paper, we present a summary of methods developed by the top 17 teams and provide an objective comparison of state-of-the-art methods and methods designed by the participants for two sub-challenges: i) artefact detection and segmentation (EAD2020), and ii) disease detection and segmentation (EDD2020). Multi-center, multi-organ, multi-class, and multi-modal clinical endoscopy datasets were compiled for both EAD2020 and EDD2020 sub-challenges. The out-of-sample generalization ability of detection algorithms was also evaluated. Whilst most teams focused on accuracy improvements, only a few methods hold credibility for clinical usability. The best performing teams provided solutions to tackle class imbalance, and variabilities in size, origin, modality and occurrences by exploring data augmentation, data fusion, and optimal class thresholding techniques. Sharib Ali, Mariia Dmitrieva, Noha M. Ghatwary, Sophia Bano, Gorkem Polat, Alptekin Temizel, Adrian Krenzer, Amar Hekalo, Bogdan J. Matuszewski, Mourad Gridach, Irina Voiculescu, Vishnusai Yoganand, Arnav Chavan, Aryan Raj, Nhan T. Nguyen, Dat Q. Tran, Lê Duy Huynh, Nicolas Boutry, Shahadate Rezvy, Haijian Chen, Yoon Ho Choi, Anand Subramanian 0004, Velmurugan Balasubramanian, Xiaohong W. Gao, Hongyu Hu, Yusheng Liao, Danail Stoyanov, Christian Daul, Stefano Realdon, Renato Cannizzaro, Dominique Lamarque, Terry Tran-Nguyen, Adam Bailey, Barbara Braden, James E. East, Jens Rittscher |
Medical Image Anal. | 14 |