Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haihang Wu

dblp:261/5097 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network growth
0.812024
When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.212024
When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

population-based training · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Neural growth is the process of growing a small neural network to a large network and has been utilized to accelerate the training of deep neural networks. One crucial aspect of neural growth is determining the optimal growth timing. However, few studies investigate this systematically. Our study reveals that neural growth inherently exhibits a regularization effect, whose intensity is influenced by the chosen policy for growth timing. While this regularization effect may mitigate the overfitting risk of the model, it may lead to a notable accuracy drop when the model underfits. Yet, current approaches have not addressed this issue due to their lack of consideration of the regularization effect from neural growth. Motivated by these findings, we propose an under/over fitting risk-aware growth timing policy, which automatically adjusts the growth timing informed by the level of potential under/overfitting risks to address both risks. Comprehensive experiments conducted using CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet datasets show that the proposed policy achieves accuracy improvements of up to 1.3% in models prone to underfitting while achieving similar accuracies in models suffering from overfitting compared to the existing methods.
Haihang Wu, Wei Wang 0133, Tamasha Malepathirana, Damith A. Senanayake, Denny Oetomo, Saman K. Halgamuge
AAAI1
2019 Reversible Data Hiding Based on Partitioning the Prediction Values
Haihang Wu, Fangjun Huang
IWDW1