Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haihang Wu
dblp:261/5097
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network growth |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
population-based training · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | When to Grow? A Fitting Risk-Aware Policy for Layer Growing in Deep Neural NetworksabstractNeural growth is the process of growing a small neural network to a large network and has been utilized to accelerate the training of deep neural networks. One crucial aspect of neural growth is determining the optimal growth timing. However, few studies investigate this systematically. Our study reveals that neural growth inherently exhibits a regularization effect, whose intensity is influenced by the chosen policy for growth timing. While this regularization effect may mitigate the overfitting risk of the model, it may lead to a notable accuracy drop when the model underfits. Yet, current approaches have not addressed this issue due to their lack of consideration of the regularization effect from neural growth. Motivated by these findings, we propose an under/over fitting risk-aware growth timing policy, which automatically adjusts the growth timing informed by the level of potential under/overfitting risks to address both risks. Comprehensive experiments conducted using CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet datasets show that the proposed policy achieves accuracy improvements of up to 1.3% in models prone to underfitting while achieving similar accuracies in models suffering from overfitting compared to the existing methods. Haihang Wu, Wei Wang 0133, Tamasha Malepathirana, Damith A. Senanayake, Denny Oetomo, Saman K. Halgamuge |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Reversible Data Hiding Based on Partitioning the Prediction Values
Haihang Wu, Fangjun Huang |
IWDW | 1 |