Michell Boerger

dblp:261/6641 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5741-9043ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Leveraging Liquid Time-Constant Neural Networks for ECG Classification: A Focus on Pre-Processing Techniques
Lisa-Maria Beneke, Michell Boerger, Philipp Lämmel, Helene Knof, Andrei Aleksandrov, Nikolay Tcholtchev
DATA2
2025 Anomaly Detection in IoT Networks: A Performance Comparison of Transformer, 1D-CNN, and GrowNet Models on the Bot-IoT Dataset
abstract
633
Aurelia Kusumastuti, Denis Rangelov, Philipp Lämmel, Michell Boerger, Andrei Aleksandrov, Nikolay Tcholtchev
DATA4
2024 SPATIAL: Practical AI Trustworthiness with Human Oversight
abstract
We demonstrate SPATIAL, a proof-of-concept system that augments modern applications with capabilities to analyze trustworthy properties of AI models. The practical analysis of trustworthy properties is key to guaranteeing the safety of users and overall society when interacting with AI -driven applications. SPATIAL implements AI dashboards to introduce human-in-the-loop capabilities for the construction of AI models. SPATIAL allows different stakeholders to obtain quantifiable insights that characterize the decision making process of AI. This information can then be used by the stakeholders to comprehend possible issues that influence the performance of AI models, such that the issues can be resolved by human operators. Through rigorous benchmarks and experiments in a real-world industrial application, we demonstrate that SPATIAL can easily augment modern applications with metrics to gauge and monitor trustworthiness. However, this, in turn, increases the complexity of developing and maintaining the systems implementing AI. Our work paves the way towards augmenting modern applications with trustworthy AI mechanisms and human oversight approaches.
Abdul-Rasheed Ottun, Rasinthe Marasinghe, Toluwani Elemosho, Mohan Liyanage, Ashfaq Hussain Ahmed, Michell Boerger, Chamara Sandeepa, Thulitha Senevirathna, Vinh Hoa La, Manh-Dung Nguyen, Claudio Soriente, Samuel Marchal, Shen Wang 0006, David Solans Noguero, Nikolay Tcholtchev, Aaron Yi Ding, Huber Flores
ICDCS6
2024 The SPATIAL Architecture: Design and Development Experiences from Gauging and Monitoring the AI Inference Capabilities of Modern Applications
abstract
Despite its enormous economical and societal impact, lack of human-perceived control and safety is re-defining the design and development of emerging AI-based technologies. New regulatory requirements mandate increased human control and oversight of AI, transforming the development practices and responsibilities of individuals interacting with AI. In this paper, we present the SPATIAL architecture, a system that augments modern applications with capabilities to gauge and monitor trustworthy properties of AI inference capabilities. To design SPATIAL, we first explore the evolution of modern system architectures and how AI components and pipelines are integrated. With this information, we then develop a proof-of- concept architecture that analyzes AI models in a human-in-the- loop manner. SPATIAL provides an AI dashboard for allowing individuals interacting with applications to obtain quantifiable insights about the AI decision process. This information is then used by human operators to comprehend possible issues that influence the performance of AI models and adjust or counter them. Through rigorous benchmarks and experiments in real- world industrial applications, we demonstrate that SPATIAL can easily augment modern applications with metrics to gauge and monitor trustworthiness, however, this in turn increases the complexity of developing and maintaining systems implementing AI. Our work highlights lessons learned and experiences from augmenting modern applications with mechanisms that support regulatory compliance of AI. In addition, we also present a road map of on-going challenges that require attention to achieve robust trustworthy analysis of AI and greater engagement of human oversight.
Abdul-Rasheed Ottun, Rasinthe Marasinghe, Toluwani Elemosho, Mohan Liyanage, Mohamad Ragab, Prachi Bagave, Marcus Westberg, Mehrdad Asadi, Michell Boerger, Chamara Sandeepa, Thulitha Senevirathna, Bartlomiej Siniarski, Madhusanka Liyanage, Vinh Hoa La, Manh-Dung Nguyen, Edgardo Montes de Oca, Tessa Oomen, João Fernando Ferreira Gonçalves, Illija Tanaskovic, Sasa Klopanovic, Nicolas Kourtellis, Claudio Soriente, Jason Pridmore, Ana R. Cavalli, Drasko Draskovic, Samuel Marchal, Shen Wang 0006, David Solans Noguero, Nikolay Tcholtchev, Aaron Yi Ding, Huber Flores
ICDCS9
2023 One to Rule them All: A Study on Requirement Management Tools for the Development of Modern AI-based Software
abstract
Modern system architectures are rapidly adopting AI-based functionality. As a result, new requirements about software trustworthiness must be considered during the entire software development life cycle of applications. While several requirement management tools are available to track and monitor requirements over time, it is still unknown to what extent these tools can cope with these new demands imposed by AI. In this paper, we contribute by performing a qualitative and quantitative analysis of different requirement management tools and their performance in managing AI-related requirements effectively. Through a rigorous analysis performed by a consortium formed by different industry and academic partners, we evaluate the suitability of five different requirement management tools. Our results indicate that while several tools are available for managing requirements, it is currently challenging to find a tool that can manage AI requirements mainly because tools do not comply with the required aspects imposed by regulatory entities. Lastly, we also shared our lessons learned and experiences from selecting requirement tools that can be used in team-based consortium projects.
Abdul-Rasheed Ottun, Mehrdad Asadi, Michell Boerger, Nikolay Tcholtchev, Dusan Borovcanin, Bartlomiej Siniarsk, Huber Flores
IEEE Big Data3
2022 Enabling Short-Term Energy Flexibility Markets Through Blockchain
abstract
Climate change has put significant pressure on energy markets. Political decisions such as the plan of the German government to shut down coal power plants by 2038 are shifting electricity production towards renewable and distributed energy resources. The share of these resources will continue to grow significantly in the coming years. This trend changes the ways how energy markets work which mandates fundamental changes in the underlying IT infrastructure. In this paper, we propose a blockchain-based solution which enables an economically viable and grid-serving integration of distributed energy resources into the existing energy system. Our blockchain-based approach targets intraday and day-ahead operating reserve markets, on which energy grid operators and operators of distributed energy resources can trade flexibilities within the schedulable energy production and consumption of their resources. By utilizing these flexibilities as an operating reserve, renewable and climate-friendly technologies can contribute to maintaining the grid stability and security of supply while simultaneously creating economically interesting business models for their operators. We propose to define blockchain-based short-term energy markets by utilizing the concept of general-purpose smart contracts and cryptocurrencies. This enables direct and decentralized trading of energy flexibilities without any intermediary or central instance. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach through an implementation of a prototype of the proposed markets based on the Ethereum blockchain and provide a detailed evaluation of its efficiency and scalability.
Michell Boerger, Philipp Lämmel, Nikolay Tcholtchev, Manfred Hauswirth
ACM Trans. Internet Techn.1